If thats the case might as well i stick with C2D. Furthermore C2D has proven to be very ocable compared to X2 in general.
Athlon X2 5600+ vs E6600 (Live Demo), finally AMD is doing something
|
|
 Feb 20 2007, 03:43 AM
|
 
Senior Member
1,334 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 04:42 AM
|
Senior Member
912 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: Cyber-LaLa
|
is it 90 or 65 nanotech?and how bout its L2 catch?
|
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 08:11 AM
|
Senior Member
3,239 posts Joined: Jun 2005
|
i'm still on intel side
 even though currently using amd. amd OC like crap compare to intel, period. btw, that amd still on 90nm? seem like it due to its TDP... |
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 09:46 AM
|
All Stars
19,321 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang
|
Like that I'll still stick to C2D. 5600+, whats the clockspeed of it?
|
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 10:10 AM
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(ikanayam @ Feb 20 2007, 03:38 AM) Also note that the x2 5600+ is 90W while the 6600 is 65W. w0ot?! what a surprise.. amd's 90w still can compete with intel's 65w   amd rock! ps: ive found some review where amd still leading intel in multimedia benchmark This post has been edited by gengstapo: Feb 20 2007, 10:12 AM |
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 10:37 AM
|
Senior Member
10,544 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: GMT +8:00 
|
QUOTE(gengstapo @ Feb 19 2007, 09:10 PM) w0ot?! what a surprise.. amd's 90w still can compete with intel's 65w What the... it rocks because a 90W chip performs about the same as a 65W chip? It means the performance/watt of the 90W chip is a lot lower. That doesn't rock at all. amd rock! ps: ive found some review where amd still leading intel in multimedia benchmark |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 10:38 AM
|
 
Moderator
9,277 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: KL. Best place in Malaysia. Nuff said 
|
QUOTE(gengstapo @ Feb 20 2007, 10:10 AM) w0ot?! what a surprise.. amd's 90w still can compete with intel's 65w But doesnt this mean that the E6600 will still be better for overclocking as it will uses less power and produce less heat? and I thought 'w' stand for watt and if it's the architecture, we would have used 'nm' or nanometre instead amd rock! ps: ive found some review where amd still leading intel in multimedia benchmark *ADDED* ikanayam had clarified the matter above. This post has been edited by linkinstreet: Feb 20 2007, 10:39 AM |
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 11:00 AM
|
Senior Member
13,340 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: back from vacation XD
|
nice demo siaz
 i will still stick 2 C2D though  while 5600 comes 2 the market the e6600 price sure drop like hell one  |
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 03:11 PM
|
Senior Member
698 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: KK, Sabah 
|
Wow, nice...AMD is coming back.
|
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 03:22 PM
|
Senior Member
788 posts Joined: Oct 2005 From: latitude 4.58635N, longitude 101.1076E 
|
X2 5600 price should be cheaper than e6600 right ??
|
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 06:39 PM
|
|
Moderator
9,277 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: KL. Best place in Malaysia. Nuff said
|
looking back at the 1st page, you can see that another forumer (ahpaul82) mentioned that the E6600 is cheaper by 10 bucks.
|
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 07:13 PM
|
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(linkinstreet @ Feb 20 2007, 06:39 PM) looking back at the 1st page, you can see that another forumer (ahpaul82) mentioned that the E6600 is cheaper by 10 bucks. then we hope some bundle or great stock cooling from this price right? |
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 08:40 PM
|
|
Moderator
9,277 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: KL. Best place in Malaysia. Nuff said
|
Meaning? for this price you will get the standard things. Proc, heatsink, etc..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 08:59 PM
|
Senior Member
2,497 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: Selangor
|
QUOTE(ikanayam @ Feb 20 2007, 10:37 AM) What the... it rocks because a 90W chip performs about the same as a 65W chip? It means the performance/watt of the 90W chip is a lot lower. That doesn't rock at all. what he really mean is, intel used 65nm tech, improved from previous 90nm tech (smaller the size, can put more transistor means more performance) which is way better in power consumption and heat. but AMD not yet using 65nm tech and the performance is on par or lost a bit to intel. just wait and see when AMD come out with their 65nm tech proc. must be rock...  p/s:but i'm a fan of intel... This post has been edited by rainingzero: Feb 20 2007, 09:23 PM |
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 09:10 PM
|
|
Junior Member
87 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Elmina
|
|
|
|
Feb 20 2007, 09:27 PM
|
Senior Member
1,496 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: Baling, Kedah
|
how bout the cache size, i think intel hv bigger tehn amd... multitasking: intel still win...
|
|
|
Feb 21 2007, 09:08 AM
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
with 2.8ghz and 89 TDP.. amd should improve more...
i doubt can oc higher... for the price better go for C2D.. http://www.amdcompare.com/us-en/desktop/de...n=ADA5400IAA5CZ |
|
|
Feb 21 2007, 10:48 AM
|
Senior Member
1,239 posts Joined: Oct 2005 From: Malacca
|
someone is selling 5600+ at garage sale for RM 1.5 k ++...
|
|
|
Feb 21 2007, 12:38 PM
|
 
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri
|
hello you guys....
5600+ is not a new thing... it's just the same old 90nm AM2 |
|
|
Feb 21 2007, 06:36 PM
|
Senior Member
3,810 posts Joined: Jan 2006
|
QUOTE(onimusha_m16 @ Feb 21 2007, 10:48 AM) someone is selling 5600+ at garage sale for RM 1.5 k ++... haha.. old tech 4 more than 1k..  mybe the price should be more lower..  |
| Change to: |  0.0171sec
 0.58
 5 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 10:31 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.