D600 is not as fast in focusing on subjects. So children/sports/wildlife type photography highly recommended D750. If you shooting non moving objects then D600 is sufficient.

Glare on D750 ?? hmmm....I didn't notice this problem on my unit.

my d610 got something wrong. when i use liveview the photo captured is damn sharp but not when i use viewfinder. any tips?

Do u mean the photo captured isn't sharp when using viewfinder or the view in the viewfinder isn't sharp?

For me the size and weight appeal is fine when it's small size, like say A6000 with small lenses.

Once it reaches A7 series, you need to use CZ or whatever expensive lenses to get the best out of it (IQ, AF, whatever else) and that pretty much negate the claim for "size and weight".

need to add on the price of each of these lenses cost a bomb.. 35mm f1.8 for the E mount cost me RM1.4k.. nikon ones are only rm650..

if set to normal AF.

the image in viewfinder looks sharp but the output does not sharp. (af time less)

the image in liveview looks sharp and does its output. (af time abit longger)

35mm nikon fullframe is like 1200+ for 2.0D and 1800+ for 1.8G

just wondering. do you wear glasses?

bro the ones i bought were only APSC and do not have the Z or G branding... One highly rated lens were the 55mm f1.8 for Full Frame.. and it cost 3 grand.. dang.. Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA

http://www.lazada.com.my/sony-carl-zeiss-s...ns-1801677.html

Dont think it matters if it is AF as mentioned by TS. Im guessing the mirror or the af module at the base need some adjustment.

Live view use on sensor AF as oppose to viewfinder which uses a different AF mechanism.

It costs 2.7k
http://www.lazada.com.my/sony-sonnar-t-fe-...ty-7629886.html

Bought the lens last week using Lazada's rm250 voucher. So net 2450