Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 K8L(K10) details :)

views
     
charge-n-go
post Feb 12 2007, 09:42 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,060 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang / PJ

In average it should be slightly higher than K8 according to AMD. Of course the 1st silicon out in market will be slightly slower than the fastest Brisbane in market.
Anyway, who cares about clock speed nowadays? As long as the CPU is faster than its older generation, clock doesnt matter.
charge-n-go
post Feb 12 2007, 05:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,060 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang / PJ

QUOTE(edwin3210 @ Feb 12 2007, 04:06 PM)
cant really agree. a 2.6GHz barcelona VS 3.6GHz C2Q (penryn) at the (if) same price range, which one will u get? speed as always "the more the merrier". u see, there are still alot of room for intel to push its clockspeed, and Intel had already announce they will release faster cpu later this year, esp when intel release Penryn. that is why the aspect of "how much performance gain Barcelona from Core architechture, clock for clock" is very important for AMD to gain market sales.
No, i dont refer to any of the Intel CPU here. I was just comparing K8L and K8 in previous post. Besides this, I mentioned Barcelona will b running slightly faster than Brisbane but the initial release might be slower than the fastest Brisbane. <-- hopefully u get my meaning here.

For the bolded part, if lower clock can outperform higher clock, is clock speed really that important? Friend, processor speed is affected by many factors, clock is just one of them.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0171sec    0.82    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 03:56 AM