QUOTE(Sentinel92 @ Apr 13 2015, 01:18 PM)
Since when there is such thing as right in sound? Some like it pre burn and after burn, some don't like it pre burn and like it after. I myself also think it's utter bullshit as burn on only tightens some of the loose ends and don't make as much of a difference, sound signature wise. Sonically maybe about 10%. Stop making minor differences sound so massive. You want major, then move on to HiFi.
'If you dont like it before burn in, youre not going to like it after its burnt in. Burn in does not transform your player into something else. It'll sound better to them after burn in if before burn in they did enjoy in the first place.'
Calm down. First of all, I was trying to say that maybe Joshua didn't get quite right about the STATEMENT he made previously. Here's what he said:
'If you dont like it before burn in,
youre not going to like it after its burnt in. Burn in
does not transform your player into something else. It'll sound better to them after burn in if before burn in they did enjoy in the first place.'
That statement is apparently not true as I find it the opposite in the case of zx2.
See, I listened to the without burn-in zx2 and to me, it wasn't acceptable. But then I really like how the burn-in zx2 sounds. I may exaggerated, but at least that's what my ears tell me. I know few guys who own the zx2, and they commented the same things. The sound of the zx2 was bad at first and it becomes great after burn in.
I am not sure whether you have listened to the fresh zx2 and after burn-in. If you had, maybe I was being utterly sensitive or exaggerating. But if you hadn't, then don't call someone's opinion as bullshit. When your whole set up is above a certain price, 10% improvement matters. But nonetheless, I sincerely think the improvement over the fresh zx2 is more than 10%.
Peace