1 private tracker from TD give away,
T&C:
member join since 2003
most active in boardband forum.
1st come 1st serve.
Hardcore seeder
pm me ur email
THE BROADBAND RANT SINK, Rant about anything and everything here!
THE BROADBAND RANT SINK, Rant about anything and everything here!
|
|
Nov 15 2007, 11:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,330 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 192.168.1.2 |
1 private tracker from TD give away,
T&C: member join since 2003 most active in boardband forum. 1st come 1st serve. Hardcore seeder pm me ur email |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 16 2007, 09:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,330 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 192.168.1.2 |
|
|
|
Nov 20 2007, 09:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,330 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 192.168.1.2 |
Eh... 60.52.x.x can load youtube w/o buffing...
It has been lagging for whole year. This Week Tis IP range. is much better. |
|
|
Nov 22 2007, 10:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,330 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 192.168.1.2 |
Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=121
Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=237ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=223ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=207ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=245ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=256ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=242ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=256ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=183ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=211ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=245ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=254ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=266ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=262ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=282ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=231ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=239ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=252ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=292ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=286ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=278ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=224ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=242ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=154ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=254ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=165ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=334ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=243ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=446ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=299ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=220ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=240ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=194ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=208ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=246ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=224ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=217ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=214ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=232ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=230ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=242ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=244ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=239ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=231ms TTL=121 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=234ms TTL=121 Reporting in : CHERAS |
|
|
Nov 26 2007, 01:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,330 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 192.168.1.2 |
|
|
|
Dec 4 2007, 12:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,330 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 192.168.1.2 |
Monday, December 03, 2007
MITIGATING SPAM IN TM NETWORK Dear valued customers, Telekom Malaysia Berhad wishes to inform its customers about TM's initiative in combating spam in its Internet Protocol (IP) network to improve our quality of service. Recently, many anti-spam organizations have blacklisted a large number of IP addresses from TM's network. Due to this many customers have been unable to send emails from their mail server to companies who might be using database from the abovementioned anti-spam organizations. These spamming activities by a small group have affected a large number of our customers, regardless of the nature of their Internet usage. . Therefore, TM is taking immediate action to address this issue. Effective 3 December 2007, TM will block OUTBOUND Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) traffic or port 25 for all out going e-mails from dynamic IP addresses. Only Outbound SMTP traffic from smtp.streamyx.com and smtp.tm.net.my will be allowed. With this implementation, Streamyx customers who have their own mail server will not be able to send e-mails. As an alternative, TM is providing an open relay server for these customers who use dynamic IP addresses. Kindly refer to http://webmail.tm.net.my/info/proxy.html on how to configure your email client in order toutilize this relay server. Alternatively, your e-mail administrators can refer to http://webmail.tm.net.my/info/smtp-proxy.html as a guide to configure your company's email servers. Please be assured that TM is proactively taking all possible measures to ensure that these spamming activities do not reoccur in the future. We seek your kind co-operation to implement the necessary security measures to protect your computers that are connected to the Internet from any e-mail abuse, virus infection, spyware and malicious code. For further enquiries and assistance, email us at help@tm.com.my or call TM at 100 and select 'Internet Services'. |
|
|
Jan 9 2008, 09:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,330 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 192.168.1.2 |
This week Connection all very Bad,
124.13.x.x is the worse IP connection to direct download in US server only 50kb/s while i can get 166kb/s with others ip 60.49.x.x - BAD 60.53 and 60.54.x.x are Better, But still worse than last week... Added on January 10, 2008, 1:02 amTM technician is configuring the internet routing again.... I can see the download speed is going up constantly and down. and even lost connection to my FTP server. This post has been edited by Suk: Jan 10 2008, 01:02 AM |
|
|
Jan 31 2008, 02:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,330 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 192.168.1.2 |
Omg... Alll international link is totally down...
only can access LYN.. WTHHHH |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0241sec
0.29
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 10:31 AM |