Maybe U can checked this?
http://www.lelong.com.my/men-s-belt-premiu...7-01-Sale-I.htm
When I browse and notice they do sell belt only thou without the buckle.
Leather belt brands suggestion ?
Leather belt brands suggestion ?
|
|
Nov 22 2016, 03:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
176 posts Joined: Sep 2011 |
Maybe U can checked this?
http://www.lelong.com.my/men-s-belt-premiu...7-01-Sale-I.htm When I browse and notice they do sell belt only thou without the buckle. |
|
|
Nov 22 2016, 03:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
176 posts Joined: Sep 2011 |
QUOTE(cheefai7 @ Nov 22 2016, 03:12 PM) I think you choose the design for the buckle and the strap length. I have tried this, and its bonded leather, flaking after 2-3 years of uses, which is ok considered the money paid. True, should last about 2 years. Nows days its about style u wouldn't want to be seen using the same belt after 5 years everyday man its just lame even rich ppl buy expensive belt and then throw it or give away after 1-2 years. |
|
|
Nov 22 2016, 03:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
176 posts Joined: Sep 2011 |
QUOTE(niakulah @ Nov 22 2016, 03:47 PM) Disagree with those statements. Fashion moves fast. Style, less so. I agree, listen closely to the rich man...money no issue.And not all rich people buy to throw away. To quote the late Terry Pratchett: “The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. He earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles. But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while the poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet. This was the Captain Samuel Vimes 'Boots' theory of socioeconomic unfairness.” |
| Change to: | 0.0145sec
0.16
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 07:57 PM |