what else do u want.. intel does't want to increase the cache size.. beside that.. bigger cache are slower and more expensive to manufacture
Core 2 Duo E6650, E6750, E6800, and E6850
Core 2 Duo E6650, E6750, E6800, and E6850
|
|
Feb 10 2007, 08:44 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
|
Elite
6,139 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
what else do u want.. intel does't want to increase the cache size.. beside that.. bigger cache are slower and more expensive to manufacture
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 10 2007, 08:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Elite
6,139 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Feb 10 2007, 08:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Elite
6,139 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Feb 10 2007, 10:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Elite
6,139 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(jcliew @ Feb 10 2007, 09:08 AM) isn't is always like that??the fastest memory in CPU is called the register.. small & fast cache is nearer to the core while bigger and slower is further.. with the exception of duron.. its second level is half the size of its L1 cache.. coz its exclusive cache exclusive cache means content of L1 is not duplicated into L2.. eg if exclusive = 128KB L1 + 256 KB L2 = 384KB effective cache or in the case of duron, its 128KB L1 + 64KB L2 = 192KB effective cache.. if inclusive = 128KB L1 + 256 KB L2 = 256KB effective cache.. of coz.. whatever reside in L1 will still be accessed quicker. This post has been edited by jinaun: Feb 10 2007, 10:31 AM |
| Change to: | 0.0161sec
0.68
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 04:01 PM |