No, for much the same reasons SG doesn't.
Whats the purpose of Marine Corps? Why would we need it?

they dont have logistics issue, their role is already pre-determined for a certain duration.. within that duration they are self sustaining..

after that period and after performing their supposed role, occupying and main invasion force should be the one taking over... marine corp is together with the navy, they are independent of the army and air force.. they have their own aviation element

no, USMC doesnt work on a battalion (russian/us army) basis as a independent unit... the smallest MAGTF is a MEU.. and its not comparable to army units because it has fixed attack wings

compared to us army division? as in with a marine division? but marine divisions dont work alone, its always part of a MEF
no suit yet?
i would say csscom (transport n supply) guys really do a good job, every year more than 8k men gets send overseas... at the moment battalion level being the largest overseas, soon brigade level aka 20k service men in total will be sent overseas annually... i doubt any country in the region move so many men overseas every year..
US army depends on US navy too...
actually i dont get how msia's para brigade works.. like VDV? dont look like it... like commandos? but they work at such huge units.. ww2 paratroopers? i doubt.. are they like the IDF's para?

Organised similar to the British 16th air assault brigade but with training of royal marines

10th brigade is more 'ad-hoc' than the 16th air assault brigade in that the individual rifle battalions usually separate to do more 'commando' stuff.But they can do brigade level jumps if the need arises

u are wierd fella..dun u think its contradict to ur statement earlier that comment about the rojakness of ATM inventory, then suddenly suggest JF17 which never had any history with ATM hence contribute to more ATM's rojakness in their inventory?

Apa guna add another regiment if the current muster PAC is physically unable to conduct brigade sized jumps because of the lack of transport aircraft?

ermm, dont think its the same with sg, behind enemy lines yes but it looks as though 10para operates in battalion sized units... for sg, since it is mostly made up of nsmen, the max is usually a company and most common a section/squad level operations while under a combined arms unit (eg. commando company, separated in sections/squads distributed across a combined arms brigade) not 1 battalion all commandos..

hmm, trained in amphibious and being the main amphibious force is different.. considering msia doesnt have carrier.. better to have two separate units for this.. one para one amphibious
i see... thanks... brigade level jumps? msia have that many planes?
well, its not short per se, its more like what they are designated for..

hold? no.. MAGTF is always together.. whether is it MEU/MEB/MEF

the battalion is only the ground element... its always a complete MAGTF, which is the MEU.. they dont send in grunts without aviation/naval cover...

you left out the aviation side of the marine's MEB... you're comparing the land component only.. that's why to you the marine is lighter
buy more mkm?

what did maldives do to malaysia or vice versa?
can't seem to google this.

hmm, if money is a concern then why have it.. its like buying ferrari but afraid of buying fuel no?

ya... 2 squadrons of mkm would be good..

huh.. airspace constrain? got meh? use only chinook?

gripen and super bug 

one time back the then leader of malaysia was mad because us fighter's on board computer was locked and controlled by the manufacter and flight path were limited, deswy moved to source from the russian.

mana tau, the russian planes have durability issue, especially the engine, need major overall over a short period of flight hours.

a round trip from kuantan to sabah sarawak is enough to ground our russian migs and su for major service

even though imma fan of typhoon, for malaysia scenario, imma full support for super hornet+hornet combined..can make a mix of 2nd hand hornet + new super-hornet

shrink the variety to Su-30MKM/SH-H/Hawk more easier for logistic, maintenance, support & training management

older than ours. they received early 90s. but some observer/enthusiast said their hornet got low mileage.

Sure

But dyou really think Big Boss is that keen to buy from US? He terus ram through full China package right after 1mdb

And dyou really think Singkies won't have a say about it?

Politics is politics, yeah? Despite what manufacturers and soldiers alike wish for...

yes, yes, and FPDA, and all
but Fat & Fluffy can tell you what is Singkieland policy re: fighter jets in the region.
you think they won't go cry to US?
whether US listen or not is another thing, I agree
Separately/reluctantly, I believe

Times of India fires the shots (look at the reference to SU-30MKI )

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/a...ow/57546519.cms

Sputnik News hits back

https://sputniknews.com/military/2017031010...ighter-dispute/

enjoy the popcorn

https://www.facebook.com/pg/oursingaporearm...154965136436063

dont see a single female also..
haih.. why la infantry.. most likely thrown into 8/9SIR... long term not sustainable for girl's body...

so lucky get 3 years ctr...

5 years is for guys who have not completed their NS.

The standard contract length is 3 years.

Change a lot le, my cuz first contract was 5 and his second was still years. After the he fo civ but still need to do reservist.