Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Military Thread V23
|
heavyduty
|
Jan 12 2017, 11:55 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(TechSuper @ Jan 12 2017, 02:44 PM) nope. USMC use M16A4. Long barrel, select fire, full picatinny rail, non-collapsible buttsotck. M4A1 is short barrel, select fire, collapsible buttstock He probably means the US army, you won't find a lot of M16s in the infantry units
|
|
|
|
|
|
heavyduty
|
Jan 14 2017, 03:17 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Jan 14 2017, 01:04 AM) Unless different caliber, standard load 9x19mm parabellum ammo should be usable to any handgun designed to fire it. What manufacture it is shouldn't matter. From what read, even hot load ammo don't have that much difference from standard ammo, in case of the 9mm parabellum the increase in muzzle velocity is around 10% only. Even standard handguns are able to handle such increase (at the cost of increased wear on the parts) and I'm not convinced that's 10% less power is enough to cause SMGs to fire badly. Er no?The 9mm luger has been around for a very long time when there was no such thing as standardized loads and PDRM history with it stretches way back to the STEN gun era.The STEN wouldn't even cycle pistol 9mm because of its heavy bolt Modern arms are designed to fire standard NATO loads but Malaysia has a mix-match guns from various eras.The boxes holding the 9mm are marked SMG-only or safe for all. This post has been edited by heavyduty: Jan 14 2017, 03:25 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
heavyduty
|
Jan 14 2017, 04:14 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(miuk @ Jan 14 2017, 03:07 AM) There's some 9mm loads floating out there that's marked for MG only. Reason being, MG are typically open bolt design and need a harder primer. Also they're loaded hotter compared to SAAMI or CIP specs. Very weird that the glock malfunctioned with MP5 ammo considering its approved for NATO 9mm.PDRM must be running their MP5s with old hot lead types
|
|
|
|
|
|
heavyduty
|
Feb 11 2017, 03:38 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(marfccy @ Feb 10 2017, 04:28 PM) this design always make me wonder do they hold the barrel that way? isnt it hot? Hold the magazine well above the magazine.like the M3 grease gun or sten SMG
|
|
|
|
|
|
heavyduty
|
Feb 18 2017, 12:47 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(DDG_Ross @ Feb 18 2017, 08:51 AM) its a lot lighter than the current pasgt style helmet but can offer same level of ballistic protection so its a good upgrade but i say its a trade-off with their equipments getting lot heavier nowadays with rpg and body armor becoming a squad standard load It's the correct progression.the Malaysian army is making body armour standard now, being prone while wearing body armour will push the back of the helmet and tilt it forward,making it hard to actually see Another advantage is that these new helmets have better impact protection so no more need for pro-tec skating helmets
|
|
|
|
|
|
heavyduty
|
Mar 7 2017, 11:21 PM
|
Getting Started

|
Okay guys time to see level mana tahap ignorance orang Malaysia in security and international relations issues.Lahad Datu and Malaysian airlines tragedies dah nampak retard dah,tengok plak Kali ni
|
|
|
|
|
|
heavyduty
|
Mar 8 2017, 12:21 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Fat & Fluffy @ Mar 8 2017, 12:18 PM) ask any of your COs that has been on joint operations before.. they would know better... btw, the LSTs are the army's asset not, the navy just operates it... its under the army's command... U don't expect a conscript to know that much do you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
heavyduty
|
Mar 8 2017, 12:39 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Fat & Fluffy @ Mar 8 2017, 12:28 PM) dunno what's his rank also... my jogging kaki a nsmen holds the rank of BG yo!! maybe he's a general leh..  Millennials NSmen,just be glad they weren't robbed by geylang trannies over the weekend
|
|
|
|
|
|
heavyduty
|
Mar 11 2017, 08:45 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(IReallyNeed Answers @ Mar 10 2017, 11:18 PM) Yeah, I'm confused most of the time as when you mentioned us military activities, it's always marines, And marines seem to have their role mixed with the regular gi At least now it's clarified! But instead of outfitting a marine battalion, maybe we should be looking for more defensive structure. I doubt we will ever have an encounter that require us to deploy offensive troop Defensive V offensive troops fell out of usage after ww2. The rapid and fluid nature of modern war means that defensive structures will be useless after 24 hours.Counter offensives are your defense
|
|
|
|
|
|
heavyduty
|
Mar 11 2017, 09:06 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(IReallyNeed Answers @ Mar 11 2017, 08:49 PM) But counter offensive wouldnt that be Cold War all over again with nuke being deployed in MAD scenario? Proactive Defensive stance such as this iron done of Israel (hopefully I got the name right) and the US SK THAAD system seem to be a big success so far You can have fancy iron domes and kinetic missile intercepting projectiles when you already cover the basics.the way I see it if thousands of separatists poured in from Kalimantan or the Philippines, Malaysia does not have the means to deploy enough troops to borneo in the needed time frame The essence of a marine corps is not the soldiers,it's the logistics.the ability to support and sustain a combined arms battle group for a prolonged period. Logistics is why SAF are the region's best. Thousands of soldiers and tanks don't mean anything if you can't bring them to the fight,supply and feed them
|
|
|
|
|
|
heavyduty
|
Mar 12 2017, 01:45 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Fat & Fluffy @ Mar 12 2017, 01:13 AM) actually i dont get how msia's para brigade works.. like VDV? dont look like it... like commandos? but they work at such huge units.. ww2 paratroopers? i doubt.. are they like the IDF's para? Organised similar to the British 16th air assault brigade but with training of royal marines 10th brigade is more 'ad-hoc' than the 16th air assault brigade in that the individual rifle battalions usually separate to do more 'commando' stuff.But they can do brigade level jumps if the need arises
|
|
|
|
|
|
heavyduty
|
Mar 12 2017, 07:45 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(mumbly297 @ Mar 12 2017, 01:58 AM) The formation of Para/PAC was due to malaysia not able to send troops quick to help Maldives. So having another 3 more regiment (with amphibious capabilities) will help Pac in future deployment. All malaysian troops are good in jungle warfare. With Pac brigade reporting direct to ATM hq, Pac will be easy to rotate on their deployment. Apa guna add another regiment if the current muster PAC is physically unable to conduct brigade sized jumps because of the lack of transport aircraft? This post has been edited by heavyduty: Mar 12 2017, 07:46 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
heavyduty
|
Mar 12 2017, 01:05 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Fat & Fluffy @ Mar 12 2017, 07:53 AM) ermm, dont think its the same with sg, behind enemy lines yes but it looks as though 10para operates in battalion sized units... for sg, since it is mostly made up of nsmen, the max is usually a company and most common a section/squad level operations while under a combined arms unit (eg. commando company, separated in sections/squads distributed across a combined arms brigade) not 1 battalion all commandos.. SAF CDO is more in line with 10th para pathfinder platoons and reconnaissance platoons in light infantry regiments
|
|
|
|
|
|
heavyduty
|
Mar 16 2017, 08:09 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Mar 16 2017, 07:38 AM) Yep in demo you can see that must loiter to show presence Lmao first time aku dengar breaching sequence dikira secret tactic.macam2 budak2 Ni The loiter in demos is because the real thing is too fast and violent, involves much more explosive s Btw,the no side sweep is a US SOF thing.involves much more syncing between the team.It looks odd when done in such a slow manner
|
|
|
|
|