+1 & click 'Like'

I agreed. Frankly, I was so disappointed to see the monthly site progress pictures. EW can't deliver what their sales team has promised the buyers. I'd called EM to voice my disappointment over the backlane garden design. I was told that it's too early to place judgement on what they will deliver. Excuse me, it's not too early as it's only weeks to VP now.

I would be disappointed if this is how the 'final' backlane looks like or going to be, even with a few planter boxes. Why can't they plant shrub or small plants along the backlane? The backlane is so empty without any design and nothing make it looks better than other terrace house project's backlane. I won't complain if Ecoworld SA didn't promise an inviting garden at the backlane as one of their main selling points. Now, I, as a buyer, would definitely feel cheated if this is the case. I don't have high expectation but they should at least deliver what they have promised. I don't mind toothpick trees as they will grow into big trees later. But they should have enough number of toothpick trees around the neighbourhood. I'm sure the landscape costs have been budgeted into the project and EW should deliver what they have promised. No high expectation, nothing fancy but please deliver what you have promised, Ecoworld. One month to VP, I can wait before I pass my judgement.

+1

See the clauses in S&P...


Attached thumbnail(s)

Yes, the EW isn't selling just the house but house with nice lanscaping around and that makes a big different to the buyers. If they delivered a bare lorong or a backlane with just 2 planter boxes, they shouldn't make it as their selling points at the very first place. Buyers are buying not just the houses itself but also the environment as a whole. This is package that make people willing to pay for the premium price tag. I'm not saying that Cradleton is expensive terrace house but it's 100k more compare with EH at year 2012. So, if they are selling their landscaping, buyers are expecting it with nothing less...