QUOTE(OcHaa @ Nov 16 2016, 10:27 AM)
Online investigation is very limited. It is better to let TS to post information which could highly probable to be linked to AromaChong than to completely dismiss his efforts because it does not have concrete proof. In cases like scamming, I would rather settle with favourable balance of probability, rather than beyond reasonable doubt. And TS also did not say it is proof. His statements are worded quite carefully in his first post. It is clear that Aromachong was involved in some unfavorable transactions recently, whether intentional or not. Just have to dig who is the person. Don't just simply scream to put people who put effort down.
Nov 16 2016, 10:58 AM

Quote
0.0217sec
0.86
7 queries
GZIP Disabled