mine is same as u coolman91, 5.9 across all.

vista ultimate 64 bit.
spec is on my siggy.
normal DDR800 ram downclock to 680 (5-5-5-15)
This post has been edited by tech3910: Oct 3 2008, 08:45 AM
Q and A What's your Windows Vista score?, Please post your score!
|
|
Oct 3 2008, 08:44 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,644 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Heaven to HELL |
another 5.9 reporting in.
mine is same as u coolman91, 5.9 across all. ![]() vista ultimate 64 bit. spec is on my siggy. normal DDR800 ram downclock to 680 (5-5-5-15) This post has been edited by tech3910: Oct 3 2008, 08:45 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 3 2008, 11:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,644 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Heaven to HELL |
QUOTE(TechnoDude94 @ Oct 3 2008, 11:33 AM) 2 match my cpu fsb. 1 : 1 ratio for best stability.as mention in my siggy, OC to 3.06 wen gaming, dats 340 x 9. (highest stable OC i can get wit default vcore of 1.25) memory multiplier set @ x2 so 340 x 2 = 680Mhz |
|
|
Oct 6 2008, 01:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,644 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Heaven to HELL |
my WD 640GB 7.2k RPM 16mb scores 5.9
PC wizard description show 100.5 mB/s |
|
|
Oct 6 2008, 03:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,644 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Heaven to HELL |
QUOTE(merzchan @ Oct 6 2008, 10:23 AM) U r using wd 6400AAKS right? how come I using smaller version of AAKS but cannot achieved 5.9? yup, dats the model............by the way there is new hdd from wd on the way, the wd cavier black with 32mb cache. actually i dun get it. how does vista rate ur HDD? from wat i c, its more like capacity den transfer time. technically speaking, wit same HDD model, is not likely dat higher capacity will beat lower capacity HDD in transfer time. so said, how can ur 320GB score lower den my 640? ps, in terms of performance, cache doesn't means much........ This post has been edited by tech3910: Oct 6 2008, 03:16 PM |
|
|
Oct 7 2008, 02:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,644 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Heaven to HELL |
|
|
|
Oct 7 2008, 07:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,644 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Heaven to HELL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 7 2008, 03:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,644 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Heaven to HELL |
QUOTE(TechnoDude94 @ Oct 7 2008, 10:16 AM) Mine is 3.3 on MacBook running Vista Ultimate SP1 32-Bit through Boot Camp. if u go pc fair last time, u shud b able 2 c it.Flaming time but "FarCry3r" beat me to it. There is no such thing as 10/10 for score. @ dat time, vista just launch, no service pack yet. also, best GC @ dat moment is still 8800 ultra which sells bout RM 3k+. @ dat time, i still haven't use vista yet & dun really knows how the rating works. but now, 2 think bck, wat h.w dey use 2 max out the vista rating? |
|
|
Oct 8 2008, 05:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,644 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Heaven to HELL |
yes i admit i remember wrong, not c wrong.
as i remember is its shows max out only.................i dun remember the exact figure, my point is it is max out. i haven't try vista @ dat time so i din bother o 2 surprise bout dat. This post has been edited by tech3910: Oct 8 2008, 05:58 PM |
|
|
Oct 8 2008, 07:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,644 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Heaven to HELL |
|
|
|
Oct 12 2008, 03:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,644 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Heaven to HELL |
|
|
|
Nov 17 2008, 11:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,644 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Heaven to HELL |
|
|
|
Dec 16 2008, 12:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,644 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Heaven to HELL |
5gb RAM.............
dats weird............ i mean y people wanna upgrade to 5 gb......... |
|
|
Dec 22 2008, 07:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,644 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Heaven to HELL |
|
|
|
Dec 24 2008, 07:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,644 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Heaven to HELL |
|
|
|
Jan 2 2009, 11:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,644 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Heaven to HELL |
QUOTE(cyew86 @ Jan 1 2009, 10:44 AM) QUOTE(one_guy @ Jan 1 2009, 11:01 AM) No la bro... My Seagate 500GB SATAII easily hit 5.9.. Maybe 32MB buffer really help.. my 16mb 7.2k rpm hdd also 5.9Thanks to seagate... This post has been edited by tech3910: Jan 2 2009, 11:59 PM |
| Change to: | 0.1257sec
0.71
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 06:57 AM |