Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Q and A What's your Windows Vista score?, Please post your score!

views
     
tech3910
post Oct 3 2008, 08:44 AM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


another 5.9 reporting in.
mine is same as u coolman91, 5.9 across all.
user posted image
vista ultimate 64 bit.
spec is on my siggy.
normal DDR800 ram downclock to 680 (5-5-5-15)

This post has been edited by tech3910: Oct 3 2008, 08:45 AM
tech3910
post Oct 3 2008, 11:04 AM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(TechnoDude94 @ Oct 3 2008, 11:33 AM)
Nice scores man. How many RPM is your Seagate?
May I know your reason of downclocking? rclxub.gif
*
2 match my cpu fsb. 1 : 1 ratio for best stability.
as mention in my siggy, OC to 3.06 wen gaming, dats 340 x 9. (highest stable OC i can get wit default vcore of 1.25)

memory multiplier set @ x2 so 340 x 2 = 680Mhz
biggrin.gif


tech3910
post Oct 6 2008, 01:11 AM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


my WD 640GB 7.2k RPM 16mb scores 5.9

PC wizard description show 100.5 mB/s
tech3910
post Oct 6 2008, 03:15 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(merzchan @ Oct 6 2008, 10:23 AM)
U r using wd 6400AAKS right? how come I using smaller version of AAKS but cannot achieved 5.9?  rclxub.gif

by the way there is new hdd from wd on the way, the wd cavier black with 32mb cache.  thumbup.gif  drool.gif
*
yup, dats the model............

actually i dun get it.
how does vista rate ur HDD? from wat i c, its more like capacity den transfer time.

technically speaking, wit same HDD model, is not likely dat higher capacity will beat lower capacity HDD in transfer time.
so said, how can ur 320GB score lower den my 640?

ps, in terms of performance, cache doesn't means much........

This post has been edited by tech3910: Oct 6 2008, 03:16 PM
tech3910
post Oct 7 2008, 02:18 AM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(lukmanb268 @ Oct 7 2008, 03:07 AM)
it the bet for laptop if score 3.1 only?
*
dats consider good already for lappy.
usually i c 1.0 or 2.0 only.

btw, last time during pc fair, i saw dey display 1 pc which scores 10/10............ shocking.gif
@ dat time, strongest GC also 8800GTX only.
tech3910
post Oct 7 2008, 07:57 AM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(FarCry3r @ Oct 7 2008, 03:42 AM)
there's no 10 score, max is 9.9, don't bullshit doh.gif
*
may b i remember wrong but how dey max it?.............. rclxub.gif
tech3910
post Oct 7 2008, 03:25 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(TechnoDude94 @ Oct 7 2008, 10:16 AM)
Mine is 3.3 on MacBook running Vista Ultimate SP1 32-Bit through Boot Camp.
Flaming time but "FarCry3r" beat me to it. doh.gif
There is no such thing as 10/10 for score. shakehead.gif You can make it? ohmy.gif You can't just come around and tell us crap cause know the truth. icon_rolleyes.gif
*
if u go pc fair last time, u shud b able 2 c it.

@ dat time, vista just launch, no service pack yet.
also, best GC @ dat moment is still 8800 ultra which sells bout RM 3k+.

@ dat time, i still haven't use vista yet & dun really knows how the rating works.
but now, 2 think bck, wat h.w dey use 2 max out the vista rating?
tech3910
post Oct 8 2008, 05:58 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


yes i admit i remember wrong, not c wrong.
as i remember is its shows max out only.................i dun remember the exact figure, my point is it is max out.
i haven't try vista @ dat time so i din bother o 2 surprise bout dat.

This post has been edited by tech3910: Oct 8 2008, 05:58 PM
tech3910
post Oct 8 2008, 07:04 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(k!nex @ Oct 8 2008, 07:54 PM)
user posted imageuser posted image

5.9 for all  icon_rolleyes.gif

my rig is described at my siggy there.
*
our system is very identical.......... smile.gif
tech3910
post Oct 12 2008, 03:43 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(Bronto11 @ Oct 8 2008, 11:17 PM)
This is my score..^^
*
how com ur vcore so high?

btw, E6300 can easily push up to 2.8 ~ 3.0 without adding vcore............. thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by tech3910: Oct 12 2008, 03:44 PM
tech3910
post Nov 17 2008, 11:49 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(soundaddict @ Nov 17 2008, 04:32 PM)
ady OC to 500x8..but,still 5.8 only..wtf!!
*
dis proof dat q6600 @ 3.0 more kick ass den e8400 @ 4.0.................. tongue.gif
QUOTE(wxtye @ Nov 17 2008, 11:13 PM)
how come like tat? my e8500 last time 3.8GHz already got 5.9
*
coz 5.9 is max.
tech3910
post Dec 16 2008, 12:15 AM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


5gb RAM.............
dats weird............ sweat.gif
i mean y people wanna upgrade to 5 gb......... sweat.gif
tech3910
post Dec 22 2008, 07:49 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(TechnoDude94 @ Dec 22 2008, 06:23 PM)
Bro, referring to the Corsair Dominator's (4GB) in your "Primary Rig" in your siggy. You will be achieving scores up to 5.9 (With OC) and 5.6 (Without OC). I think you should refresh your WEI score. thumbup.gif
*
even my 4gb value ram score 5.9..................=.=
tech3910
post Dec 24 2008, 07:05 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(TechnoDude94 @ Dec 24 2008, 02:58 AM)
Bro, what are the specs of your PC? Btw, my 4X 1GB Kingston Value RAM DDRII 667MHz has a score of 5.6 flex.gif
*
i think b coz ur RAM is running @ 667, try 2 OC it la............... brows.gif
tech3910
post Jan 2 2009, 11:59 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(cyew86 @ Jan 1 2009, 10:44 AM)
my 7.2k HDD also got 5.9 for WEI smile.gif maybe has something to do with 32MB buffer?
*
QUOTE(one_guy @ Jan 1 2009, 11:01 AM)
No la bro... My Seagate 500GB SATAII easily hit 5.9.. Maybe 32MB buffer really help..
Thanks to seagate... whistling.gif
*
my 16mb 7.2k rpm hdd also 5.9

This post has been edited by tech3910: Jan 2 2009, 11:59 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1257sec    0.71    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 06:57 AM