Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Conclusion= AROMA IS THE SCAMMER, BEWARE OF DUPES!

views
     
joe_mamak
post Nov 11 2016, 04:18 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


Any other victims have come forward? Or only the threadstarter?
joe_mamak
post Nov 11 2016, 04:49 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


The delete function in the forum is not for the threadstarter to censor posts that he does not like.

It is supposed to be used when there are reports made.

Don't abuse the function.
joe_mamak
post Nov 11 2016, 04:55 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(adolph @ Nov 11 2016, 04:54 PM)
we report him balik use that report button. let him bora2.
*
Those who have their posts deleted can go report him.
joe_mamak
post Nov 11 2016, 06:00 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(AeronBabe @ Nov 11 2016, 05:57 PM)
Like someone mention earlier, most of the people just enjoy some drama with popcorn. We r not dealing with the Ting people now, we r dealing with aroma.

anyways, all victim has agreed with aroma on the refund process, kindly respect everyones decision, im not here to defend anyone, just giving some explanation to all. Since she bear all responsibilities that she kena scammed. I don't need to further explain more, i will come out open thread when she scam me again, till then, kthxbye
*
did you all meet up for a face to face meeting?
joe_mamak
post Nov 11 2016, 06:03 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(AeronBabe @ Nov 11 2016, 06:01 PM)
we come from diff parts of malaysia,so no  smile.gif
*
Oh. OK. blink.gif

All the best.


joe_mamak
post Nov 11 2016, 06:23 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


I hope at least one of the victims met the middleman face-to-face.

Or at least had a video call.
joe_mamak
post Nov 11 2016, 06:48 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(Alvinee282828 @ Nov 11 2016, 06:27 PM)
So far all attempts for face to face failed. Victims are at mercy of aroma. That is why refund plan (promised not yet delivered) conisdered good liao for all of us....
*
It should be the other way round. Aroma should be at the mercy of you guys.

At least have a video call. Seize him/her up to see if he/she is sincere.

This post has been edited by joe_mamak: Nov 11 2016, 06:48 PM
joe_mamak
post Nov 11 2016, 06:49 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(Alvinee282828 @ Nov 11 2016, 06:47 PM)
Good analysis. AROMA has a reputation to protect and she clings so dearly to.
*
That's why. He/she should be at the buyers' mercy. Not the other way round.

This post has been edited by joe_mamak: Nov 11 2016, 06:50 PM
joe_mamak
post Nov 11 2016, 06:52 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(Alvinee282828 @ Nov 11 2016, 06:50 PM)
Why not u simulate the situation urself. See who at mercy of who. Ever wondered why victims no time to reply in LYN. Coz we were busy at hell figuring out the situation.
*
QUOTE(Alvinee282828 @ Nov 11 2016, 06:51 PM)
Thats why we still can negotiate. Abuden.
*
I got simulate.

People treat me like shit, I return in kind lor.
joe_mamak
post Nov 11 2016, 06:55 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(Alvinee282828 @ Nov 11 2016, 06:53 PM)
U should re-simulate. Take into account Aroma past behaviour and project forward how she will react.
*
Done that too.

I will still return in kind. Will lodge police reports. Pursue the case with the IO.



joe_mamak
post Nov 11 2016, 07:00 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(Alvinee282828 @ Nov 11 2016, 06:57 PM)
U think report police will help? U have good faith in the legal enforcement system. Its good popcorn move though.
*
Someone with connections offered to help in the dispute thread.

I will also try to get some lubang to help out.

I won't be at that person's mercy.

Why? Because that someone has shitted on me. I will not let it go lightly.

But, I understand if you don't want to go down this path.

It just sounded a tad pathetic to put yourself at this person's mercy.

You guys are better than that.
joe_mamak
post Nov 11 2016, 07:10 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(Darth Vaper @ Nov 11 2016, 07:05 PM)
Come on guys. Let's get off the victims' back in this tered. This tered was obviously made to please Ting Jack Woon.

But go to the other tered to continue bashing
*
I wasn't bashing. I just gave one or two suggestions. And maybe a bit more.

It sounded a bit pathetic and sad that the victims consider themselves to be at the mercy of the middleman.


joe_mamak
post Nov 11 2016, 07:25 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(twilight_fever @ Nov 11 2016, 07:12 PM)
u all shld go c d thread at dispute corner..aromachong put a forumer into the report yo..

https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/4105374
*
laugh.gif

The report was about the thread made by fighteden.

I thought it would be something else.
joe_mamak
post Nov 11 2016, 07:28 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


Also go look up this -

https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...&#entry82467119

All the best guys.


joe_mamak
post Nov 11 2016, 11:52 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(silent_stalker @ Nov 11 2016, 11:34 PM)
If what I read is true, that the buyers deposit money into suppliers acc, not aroma, I would say any report is useless against aroma.

And if this is true a con case, I have to admit, aroma is pretty smart
*
Why do you say that? What if the middleman is in cahoots with the supplier? Not that I am saying aroma is in cahoots. biggrin.gif


joe_mamak
post Nov 12 2016, 12:01 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(Arata @ Nov 11 2016, 11:03 PM)
Jolokia mana? Her/his tag team partner right?
*
jolokia don't know which dupe account already.
joe_mamak
post Nov 12 2016, 12:58 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(G_KeN @ Nov 12 2016, 12:41 AM)
TOPKEK

lol, when i read remix2040 case, i thought, well it is plausible that aromachong sourced the phone from a supplier or something.

but then, when i read salimbest83 case, it is very clear to me that there is no such thing as 'supplier' or 'middleman'. salimbest83 bnked in to the same bnk acc as remix did to help purchase stuffs from gemfive.
Im absolutely SURE that you dont need TWO MIDDLEMEN for a gemfive transaction. doh.gif
*
Did anyone highlight this in the dispute thread?

https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/4105374

Maybe you should post this there.

This post has been edited by joe_mamak: Nov 12 2016, 12:58 AM
joe_mamak
post Nov 13 2016, 03:48 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


So, what's the conclusion?
joe_mamak
post Nov 14 2016, 12:35 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(moiskyrie @ Nov 13 2016, 08:36 PM)
forgot 1 thing, why the thread not in dispute corner but in /k sub forum?
*
There is a thread over there.
joe_mamak
post Nov 14 2016, 12:54 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
363 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


Did aromacheong say explicitly he is a lawyer?

I wonder.

2 Pages  1 2 >
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0446sec    0.64    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 01:09 PM