Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Financial MRTA vs MLTA vs Term Plus..., whatever they call it

views
     
TSsuiteng
post Feb 8 2007, 11:53 AM, updated 17y ago

Hopeless President
*******
Senior Member
3,589 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


Ok lah.. I'll put this here for info. Heard from a friend of mine who blur blur go and buy a house and never heard of the options available for MRTA. Here goes..

Mortgage Life Insurance

Mortgage Life Insurances are designed to pay off the outstanding loan balance in the event that the borrower dies or suffers from total and permanent disability (TPD) before the loan is fully paid off.

Basically there are two types of mortgage life insurance available in the market. One type is commonly known as Mortgage Reducing or Decreasing Term Assurance (MRTA or MDTA) and the other choice is Mortgage Level Term Assurance (MLTA).

Mortgage Reducing Term Assurance (MRTA) or Mortgage Decreasing Term Assurance (MDTA)

MRTA or MDTA is a reducing term life assurance specially designed to protect a loan borrower against death or TPD (total permanent disability) due to natural or accidental causes. Some lenders will allow you to finance and add the premium to your home loan (up to a certain percentage of your loan amount).

MRTA or MDTA is a simple insurance policy and has become a common and acceptable policy taken up by the borrower whenever he takes up a mortgage loan. The premium is paid upfront in one lump sum. Some lenders will finance and add the premium to your loan. The borrower can choose the amount and tenure of the coverage and the amount of premium will be determined by these factors as well as his age and gender. Banks normally encourage the borrower to take up this policy by giving better pricing on their interest rates if the borrower signs up a MRTA or MDTA policy.

To the borrower this is relatively a hassle free, affordable and necessary policy as their mortgages are covered in the event of any unfortunate incident that may caused death or TPD.

Mortgage Level Term Assurance (MLTA)

MLTA is a slight variation from MRTA or MDTA and offers an alternative for a borrower who is looking for a life insurance which offers protection plus savings and in some policies returns on the premium.

Premium is paid on a monthly, quarterly, half yearly or yearly basis and the policy holder can choose to have a wider coverage other than death and TPD. The amount of the premium will be determined by the usual factors and the scope of additional coverage.

Comparison and Features of MDTA and MLTA

Life-MLTA
1. Transferable
This policy is transferable whenever the borrower buys a new property or refinances his loan with another bank.

Example: Transfer this policy, adjust the sum assured to match the new loan, as many times as you need.

2. Insurability is Guaranteed
You purchase only once, with the same sum assured, there is no need to prove your health condition again.

3. With Savings or Returns (Cash Value)
Premium paid will be accumulated either as savings or savings plus returns. The cash value can be used to reduce or pays off your mortgage.

MRTA
1. Not Transferable
In most cases, new MDTA policy has to be taken up whenever a borrower changes his properties or refinances his loan with another bank
Example: 5 yrs later, refinancing at the older age, for same tenure of same loan amount, the MDTA cost is higher.

2. Insurability is not Guaranteed
Most of the time every time you finance your property, you have to prove that you are healthy to purchase MDTA.

3. No Cash Value
It is an expense with zero cash value at end of the mortgage tenure.

In lament term with example :
For example : The applicant name is Ken. He's a 24 male and bought a property for 230k but he only take 100k loan.

MRTA scenario
So if he purchase RM100k for 30 years MRTA the premium will be RM2165 and the surrender value from time to time is less and less. So, if anything happen to Ken at 5th year, the benefit he get from insurance com will be RM95299 while 10th year will be RM87319. So at the end, the value will be zero at 30th year.

MLTA scenario
If he purchase same RM100k and 30 years MLTA, he needs to pay RM61 every month and gets the level protection. He can choose to pay monthly, quarterly, semi-annually or annually. If Ken is TPD and can't make a source to pay for monthly installment, the benefits he get is RM100k no matter at which year. If Accidental death it would be X 2, the benefits will be RM200k. This is consider savings and you get the level benefits no matter 1st year or 18th or 30th year. Because the surrender value is high and higher. If Ken have nothing happen at 30th year, he can get back the value he prepaid. This is the benefit you get from MLTA. And, Ken is only 24, if he buy a better property, he can bring this MLTA over to that property and extend it.

This post has been edited by suiteng: Jan 9 2009, 09:18 AM
TSsuiteng
post Feb 8 2007, 07:16 PM

Hopeless President
*******
Senior Member
3,589 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(feralee @ Feb 8 2007, 01:03 PM)
Thanks for the info
all the while i only heard of MRTA

Any idea which serve better?
*
If you have a life insurance or if you want to gao dim 1 shot, then MRTA lor..

If you don't have a life insurance, you can get MLTA. But you must fork up some to buy the rider (i.e. 36 CI).
TSsuiteng
post Feb 26 2008, 11:45 AM

Hopeless President
*******
Senior Member
3,589 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


If you want to insure yourself according to the value of the loan you took, then you take MLTA. If you want cukup cukup to cover the "remainder" of loan then MRTA is enough.

In a way, MLTA is like insurance. You take RM200k loan, you insure yourself for RM200k. And if "choi choi choi" ADD, you get double the amount.

MRTA on the other hand, e.g. you took RM200k loan. After 10 years, you have paid off until left RM80k hutang (I didn't really count, illustration purposes only). If anything happens to you, you only get RM80k.
TSsuiteng
post Apr 7 2008, 11:05 AM

Hopeless President
*******
Senior Member
3,589 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(giasens @ Mar 2 2008, 10:22 PM)
Recently i was approached by an insurance agent
he recommended me to buy Life Insurance over MRTA,
as Life Insurance able to cover the death + if the mature date reaches, you can withdraw the money + interest to payoff the homeloan.
(fyi, i've already have an lifeinsurance plan)

is this called MLTA?
coz i asked if it is MLTA, he said no if im not mistaken (he's from great eastern btw)

so, it's now like MRTA vs MLTA vs LifeInsurance
*
When you buy your houses or properties. You can actually use your personal life insurance as replacement of MRTA. Just tell your Banker that you will morgage out your life insurance. In case anything happen to you yourself. The banker to claim the remainder payment on your life insurance. But there are few things you need to remember before you really use this method to save your MRTA premium.

1) Always ensure you have more than 2 life insurance on hand. One for necessary illnesses protection, second one is for add on protection (opt to have).

2) this method is good for short term properties investment. Less than 5 years investment is prefered.

3) Do not use Critical illnesses life policy to replace MRTA, what if you need this money to cure your illnesses.

Recetly I found that there is another way to save your MRTA money but at the same time u invest without affecting insurance protection. How?

QUOTE(cuebiz @ Mar 29 2008, 06:38 PM)
Not much different from normal Term Life Insurance
*
Also, was wondering if anyone thought about this, if you have already purchased 2-3 properties, let's say 150k each, and you have MRTA on all of them, then effectively that's like having term insurance value of 300-450k should anything happen to you. If so, why do people buy life insurance on top of that? The premiums for life cover is much more expensive than term too... not sure if one needs to pay for all the product features when all you need is protection.
TSsuiteng
post Apr 9 2008, 12:27 PM

Hopeless President
*******
Senior Member
3,589 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(cute_boboi @ Apr 9 2008, 12:23 PM)
Personally, if I were to choose between MRTA / MLTA for my property, I choose MLTA.

1) MLTA = gets back whatever I pay at the end of the period

2) The interest  (supposedly earn) from the payment, I consider it as premium to buy the insurance protecting the house and me.

3) based on the 100k loan example in TS first post, I would prefer to get 100k coverage no matter which installment year I am in.

4) No doubt, paying rm61 x 12 mth x 30 yrs = rm21,960 which is much higher than MRTA 2k+. But I get back full 21k at the end.
*
Thanks for the reply. I've heard of some plan recently..
QUOTE(suiteng @ Apr 7 2008, 11:05 AM)
Recetly I found that there is another way to save your MRTA money but at the same time u invest without affecting insurance protection. How?
*

Any idea? Nothing much in google.

This post has been edited by suiteng: Apr 9 2008, 12:28 PM
TSsuiteng
post Oct 29 2008, 07:43 PM

Hopeless President
*******
Senior Member
3,589 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


Is this property for investment or for own stay?
TSsuiteng
post Jan 9 2009, 09:18 AM

Hopeless President
*******
Senior Member
3,589 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


If own stay then MLTA lor..
TSsuiteng
post Mar 18 2009, 03:11 PM

Hopeless President
*******
Senior Member
3,589 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(daruma @ Mar 18 2009, 09:50 AM)
if two person buy one house.

then one ppl got unfortunate. then will the loan no need to pay?
*
Depends on what you buy. If MRTA, then the loan no need to pay. If MLTA, then the money will go to the beneficiary and the beneficiary will decide on what to do with the money.
TSsuiteng
post Mar 18 2009, 03:43 PM

Hopeless President
*******
Senior Member
3,589 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(daruma @ Mar 18 2009, 03:11 PM)
MRTA mar...  what i read , if single person. got unfortunate then no need pay installment.

but if joined name, two person. one person disabled... how ler?
*
Depends on the coverage you pay for.

E.g. 1
If loan amount = 100k for 30 years.
Borrower 1 : cover 50% = RM1101
Borrower 2 : cover 50% = RM1101

Either one TPD on first year, you will get 50% of 100k = 50k.
Either one TPD on 15th year, you will get 50% of (principle, e.g. 50k) = RM25k.

E.g. 2
If loan amount = 100k for 30 years.
Borrower 1 : cover 100% = RM2202
Borrower 2 : cover 100% = RM2202

Either one TPD, you will get 100% of 100k = 100k.
Either one TPD on 15th year, you will get 100% of (principle, e.g. 50k) = RM50k.

Estimation only, ok? But once claimed, all your debts will be paid first before any amount of $$ reach your hand (if there's any left).
TSsuiteng
post Mar 18 2009, 03:57 PM

Hopeless President
*******
Senior Member
3,589 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(daruma @ Mar 18 2009, 03:52 PM)
e.g 2 pay double wor..

if only one person borrow. same 100k 30 years. for 100% coverage.
will it be RM2202 or RM4404?
*
The premium is an example only.

The difference is coverage, full or half or whatever you wanna choose, 80:20 also can.

If 1 ppl borrow, then buy 1 person, premium RM2202 for 100% coverage. Means if buy yourself, if anything happened to you then your beneficiary can claim. If anything happen to your beneficiary.. erm, too bad.
TSsuiteng
post Jul 15 2009, 11:34 AM

Hopeless President
*******
Senior Member
3,589 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(kent1988 @ Jul 14 2009, 07:20 PM)
Guys,I am totally new to the acquisition of new house...Recently my family planned to buy a new house,from the developer...we had paid a 3k deposit...The house price is Rm225k...my father planned to take only RM80k loan,so paying  RM145k upfront....But today an Agent from a home loan consultancy company told me about a new plan....His advice to us is not to pay that much as upfront,due to this might cause in Taxation problem...secondly...the agent said they do have a package for the client to save interest rate....

The idea is roughly about borrow higher amount from bank...and don take any MLTA or MRTA,but use another type of insurance,which is called as MIA ( Mortgage Insurance Account)..the benefit of doing so is that the MIA mentioned is some kind of saving insurance,which at the end of the insured term,we can get back the money we invested in the mortgage account..So the agent told me not to pay the big upfront,but instead paying upfront amount,lets say 40k...so the remaining RM105k(RM145k-40k) can be use to pay the premium for MIA..then maybe after few years i can use the premium paid to pay off the remaining loan amount for my house...

Actually can anyone advice me for this? and my situation is,we planned to take as least loan amount as possible(to save interest)..then after maybe 5 years ,we planned to settle all the remaining loan amount.....

Ps : there is no consultancy fees or any charges for using the homeloan consultancy firm....and from wat the agent told me,i could save some legal fees by appointing them,as compare to the normal way,which mean we get our own lawyer and settle everything..the agent said they will help us to settle everything from the beginning till the end...

Thanks in advance....
*
@bold, no such thing.

Saving interest rate package? I guess it's more towards flexi.

If you plan to pay it off early, there's no need to take an "investment" like product. Just an MRTA will do. If it was me, I wouldn't even buy MRTA if the bank permits tongue.gif

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0311sec    0.35    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 05:46 PM