Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Lowyat.Net's Watercooling Club, Pictures of setups & screenies !
|
overclockalbert
|
Aug 31 2007, 11:41 PM
|
|
QUOTE(lichyetan @ Aug 31 2007, 11:23 PM) i think new intel Core 2 series also run much more cooler compare to amd x2 as its using 65nm technology and also more power efficient compare to my x2 3800+ (s939) which using 90nm technology. that was for sure. that's what technology is all about, moving forward. We (s939 user) will be soon left over by 65nm and then the 45nm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
overclockalbert
|
Sep 23 2007, 05:45 AM
|
|
QUOTE(remysix @ Sep 6 2007, 03:10 AM) ya lor...but mine load wif 71c...since i've use the same proc on hsf last time, it is logical for me to expect better temp wif WC, dun u think so and can u imagine that at idle it was 44c, load 71c (3.6G@1.45v). it was 27c different. using hsf - geminiII & xigmatek, highest temp is around that la...71c but normally lower. anyway, now i know that the problem is the contact between my proc and the cpu block. no matter how i mount it, it will produced the same result. my next probable option is to bow the GT, so hopefully can get better contact and better temp. i think by bow the GT, u will have much lower load temp. your problem was most probably from the GT block surface too flat, can make a good contact with your processor IHS. anyway, had u lapped proc IHS?
|
|
|
|
|
|
overclockalbert
|
Aug 11 2008, 08:47 PM
|
|
buy one new WB better.
those foundries charge you rm120 per hour. yr Wb will be damn expensive, maybe more then D-tek
|
|
|
|
|
|
overclockalbert
|
Aug 28 2008, 05:39 AM
|
|
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « QUOTE(ryudox @ Aug 28 2008, 12:26 AM) @ryudox, you better get some zip tie to hold the tube from the barb, the tube will loose anytime.
|
|
|
|
|