Downloaded the video, it also has stuttering problem.
Looks like I have to upgrade the GPU instead of the CPU.
Lately I have been reading CPU and GPU stuff online and I am eyeing GTX 1660 since I tested it in a computer shop(i5 9400F CPU, GTX 1660) and it can run 8k 60fps smoothly as well (reaching around 78% GPU, 20% CPU on task manager). Price seems to be around RM1.1k+ after converting to Ringgit
Currently my specs are : Power Supply - Corsair GS600 Processor - Intel i5-3550 @3.30ghz (ivy bridge) Motherboard - Gigabyte Z77-D3H
If I were to upgrade to this GPU, i do not have to upgrade anything else right?
i5 3470 with GTX 1060, have no problem running HEVC 4k HDR 60fps, no stuttering. If you're not for playing games, you can just buy second hand, Pascal GPU can get very cheaper now. Or go for GTX 1650/1660 if in future you need it to support VP9 10/12 bit and also HEVC 4:4:4.
Also possibility AMD delay their launching which also delay their selling because TSMC production allocation all used up for producing chip for PS5 and Xbox.
There's rumour now the sneak peek AMD giving during Ryzen 5000 launching is not using it's flagship GPU.
Come to think about it, if AMD already show it's best GPU performance, it will not be exciting anymore when doing Radeon launching. Now people thought that's its max performance, when launching they show something even higher performance, sure will get people excited.
Source pls? If RNDA2 CU scale linearly like in a perfect world, 80 CU will definitely perform higher than 3080 but from past experienced they never scale linearly.. not even close, even the mighty Nvidia couldn't make it happen on high core counts die.
QUOTE
Dissecting the AMD vs. Nvidia chess match
Most importantly, Herkelman stressed that AMD didn’t state which Radeon RX 6000 graphics card ran these benchmarks. We don’t know whether these results come from the biggest Big Navi GPU, or a more modest offering. (Herkelman also said there’s still fine-tuning left to do before launch.) AMD’s Ryzen 9 5900X, the CPU used for the tease, also hasn’t been tested by independent reviewers.
Yeah, also maybe they don't have RT and Tensor core. Still, the jump in efficiency from RDNA1 and 2, based on the slides, are quite impressive, like the jump from 780Ti to 980Ti on the same 28nm (lol those are the days).
Now the previously confirmed fake leak doesn't look so fake anymore. A lot of it is right as per announcement. https://www.tweaktown.com/news/73241/amd-ra...ides/index.html I bet it's someone with inside info that purposely share this leak and add other fake stuff to obscure it.
So now whether RXRT is AMD answer to RTX and if the slide are true, not much performance hit when turning it on.
Looking forward to see what AMD will do with ray tracing, especially since most of the devices moving forward will have their version of it. Maybe expecting something this gen is too soon, perhaps in a couple of years we'll see something amazing with RT.
I think AMD will have ray tracing for this gen as it is part of DX12 Ultimate, too big of a feature to omit it.
AMD updated their benchmark, now even higher result. FH4 at 2k, 6800 even beating 3090. Really wtf! MS studio game seem in favor of Radeon card, maybe they work together to optimized the game and driver. I think Smart Access Memory also helped to make communication between CPU and GPU faster, which is important when at lower resolution that can push more fps.
i leave mine on for days as u know ahem2 downloads slow house internet when i wanna wake up the screen its just black screen, need to pull out the dp cable and reinsert then have display, sometimes cycling the panel power works but most of the time i have to disconnect the dp.
not a big issue for me. my monitor works fine btw no problems or defects
Most router these day have download manager. No need to leave PC running for days just to download.
AMD Radeon RX 6800 Beats NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 in Shadow of the Tomb Raider (4K, WQHD), Even with Ray Tracing Enabled (DLSS Off)
PJ_Lab_UH has shared benchmarks of the Radeon RX 6800 running Shadow of the Tomb Raider, which show that the GPU can hit 46 FPS and 80 FPS in the 4K and WQHD settings, respectively, with ray tracing enabled in the High setting.
Additional benchmarks compiled by Wccftech suggest that the Radeon RX 6800’s ray-tracing performance actually exceeds NVIDIA’s newly launched GeForce RTX 3070, as well as the older, Turing-based GeForce RTX 2080 Ti flagship, when DLSS is disabled.
Uniko’s Hardware’s PJ also posted the first result of the Radeon RX 6800 GPU running in 3DMark TimeSpy. Here, the Graphics chip delivers a graphics score of 16,775 points and an overall score of 12,704 points.
The GPU is said to feature a TGP of 250-280W, so that’s 60W higher wattage than the GeForce RTX 3070. To make a direct comparison of these Time Spy scores, we can use the most recent review from Guru3D, who tested an MSI RTX 3070 GAMING X Trio GPU, which scored 14159 graphics points.
This makes the Radeon RX 6800 18% faster than MSI RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio. The AMD card is even 22% faster than the reference GPU model which has also been tested in the same benchmark. But you should exercise caution with any early preliminary scores, because we don’t know if the RX 6800 was using final compatible drivers, and/or if the graphics card was also overclocked.
But thing is in sam they required 500 motherboard and 5000 cpu
Seems like a very small sub set of requirements?
Or if nvidia enable it, it will be exclusive to 500 and 5000 as well?
Require 500 mobo because of PCIE Gen 4? If not for PCIE Gen 4 then older mobo will also be compatible. I didn't notice got mention need 500 mobo, if not mistaken they only mention engineering mobo.
During 6000 series launching at the disclaimer it only mention engineering mobo (or something similar, can't remember), it didn't mention B550 / X570 or 500 series mobo. Too bad if older mobo can't support it.
????? 'Engineering mobo' is referring to the Mobo they use to activate the SAM. There could be a reason why they didn't name the mobo explicitly/specifically as to not to upset their partners or something along that line.
Engineering mobo can be any version of the mobo, could even be a new version of mobo. Doesn't need to mention which partner mobo, they could have just mention B550/X570 or 500 series mobo. Anyway all is good now since they already mentioned 500 series.
Most important question, how many online sellers will force bundle? Is it: a. All b. All c. All
Sadly GPU makers didn't control their distributor. Unlike Sony, when Gam*cough* Hid*cough* try to force bundle selling PS5.
QUOTE(sojurn @ Nov 18 2020, 11:22 PM)
It seems the summary is something like this:
Raster: 4K: Win some / Lose some on both sides 1440p: Generally AMD 1080p: AMD
But, if you care about RT, go with nVidia. Either way, great showing by AMD, esp with the additional VRAM. Hope RDNA3 keeps up the pace and competes on RT as well.
This is my take away, and kinda what I've concluded for ~1-2 weeks now based on leaks but needed today to confirm. Really happy with the 6800XT.
6000 series competitive gamers will flock it as it better in the 1%
The 6800xt is supposed to be the 3080 equivalent kan? I see them sellin for like.. 4k+ Like that better go sg or thai buy and smuggle in. Can probably save money at that point
3080 fe same price as 6800xt fe. But now 3080 also selling at 4k+
Feb 1 2020, 10:14 PM
Quote
0.1054sec
0.72
7 queries
GZIP Disabled