QUOTE(WyjSwmW @ Oct 12 2016, 03:44 PM)
I don't agree with you totally.
Now is Samsung mistake! Why penalise consumers if it is Samsung mistake?
Since Samsung is a big company, I am sure they can fork out another USD 20 billion for assessories compensation.
Let's say you renovated and painted your new house, suddenly developer told you, shit fuck.. The house we built is not safe and solid, you need to move out of the house as soon as possible.
And yet the developer only willing to compensate you the cost of the house but not renovation and paintings..
Is it fair??
Maybe you are rich, that why you say RM3k phone is nothing to you, even RM600 assessories is ok for you too if Samsung never compensate.
This is a BIG hole from the laws already..
Now the most headache are not at the customer side, but at the supplier who already bought bulk for the tempered glass, phone case and those accessories.. Is it that accessories also bulk back to Samsung?
If do so, I think Samsung need additional football field (factory place) to put those reject bulk accessories Note 7 items... I think it's need take more than a years to settle this...
I just wondering who is the fellow staff to design that Note 7? And who is the supplier name to supply the battery? I think Samsung should put all the pressure to those battery supplier and designer..
Pity man, end up RIP Note 7...