intel to slash price on april 22nd
intel to slash price on april 22nd
|
|
Apr 27 2007, 12:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
how PC shops deal with old batch of stocks then? If all of them have to cut prices, what if they still got old stocks havent let go yet ? sure rugi teruk wor
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 22 2007, 01:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
I hope that GC price will drop as much as a CPU does.
|
|
|
May 22 2007, 08:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
haih... computer hardware kinda things
btw, why that Q6600 is almost 50% of that QX6700? |
|
|
May 23 2007, 07:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
rm100 processor will getting more powerful
lets say with athlon3000 at rm100, pair with 8500gt for rm300, with some cheap mobos and RAM, whoa.. HTPC is the future |
|
|
May 24 2007, 07:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
aiks... amd o' amd... i disappointed in u lar
|
|
|
May 26 2007, 01:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(Phoenixwunin @ May 26 2007, 09:29 AM) Yeah... veeerrrryyy bad timing option1: buy a cheapo used pentium D from garage sales to serve u for 22 days, then buy the quad coreI think I'll just stick with E6600... if by chance someone ones to buy mine (maybe a friend?? who knows... option2: buy e6600, and wait one day where quad core will be in rm500s range |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 06:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(Phoenixwunin @ Jun 7 2007, 06:05 PM) yup... it can be said so...Intel FSB is quad-pumped, means 266 x 4 = 1066 Million transfers per second, thats how the FSB is derived. To determine RAM clock, multiply the base FSB by 2, eg: 266*2 = 533 MHz, which means that at 1066 MT/S, the maximum RAM clock can be supported is DDR2-533 MHz however there might be RAM ratio like those seen in AMD's RAM divider, to make RAM work at different speed than processor, not sure how this implemented in intel This post has been edited by dattebayo: Jun 7 2007, 06:38 PM |
|
|
Jun 11 2007, 03:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
|
|
|
Jun 19 2007, 02:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(kennji @ Jun 19 2007, 02:06 AM) errrm...my noob question would be: is it worth to follow the FSB 1333 trend? or do i stick with FSB 1066? i fear the upcoming e6x50 series are their e6x00 equivalent with factory overclocked to higher FSB? it would seem to be stupid to buy these new ones when you can get the e6x00 cheaper and OC it... IINM, u ll need a newer mobo chipset that can support 1333 mhz FSB, then only u can fully utilize the faster FSB. and btw, higher FSB means less room for OC? cuz the FSB is already quite high at the first place.... help help...am i getting something wrong? the newer series are not just factory OC'ed. But they support that FSB natively, and by 1333 FSB means that 667mhz DDR2 can now work at 1:1 ratio I think all those future mobo will have at least 1333 mhz of FSB, so everything is begin from there, therefore u can OC beyond 1333mhz, but u ll need higher speed RAM like DDR2 800 then btw, do the FSB 1333 proc work perfectly on older 1066 mobo? This post has been edited by dattebayo: Jun 19 2007, 02:19 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0221sec
1.01
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 08:13 PM |