QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Nov 16 2016, 03:38 PM)
Seriously, what is the problem with the Kedah-class not equipped with missiles? At least the Exocets if not the SeaRAM?
IIRC the RMN has a good number of Exocets. In the grand scope of things, is it so costly to install a few on the Kedah-class? A ship only needs 8 missiles anyway (assuming the on-board FCS can already support them). :confused:
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Nov 16 2016, 05:07 PM)
because right now it will only served as Patrol Vessel role only
As ever, I believe its budget issue as well as operational requirements
6 Kedahs x 8 missiles x about EUR 1m each = Rm224 million
Thats not chump change. Even if we arm just 2 Kedahs at a time, thats Rm75M... its the choice between up gunning the Kedahs with token* antiship weapons or buying another 1.5 LMS platforms... choose.
*with the vast array of SAMs and CIWS in existence the best antship weapon is a sublaunched torpedo. Thats the Western doctrine anyway.
P.s. RAM missile is the same price and come in 21 round launcher... you figure that price out I already

QUOTE(waja2000 @ Nov 16 2016, 11:50 AM)
agree, it will cost more, and not happen soon, at lease ofter SGPV is built. i think LMS can past to 2nd tier ship yard to built.
also BM5/BM6/Tun Azizan after Lahad Datu standoff,it add role as mobile sea base, but it not really good solution.
Muhibbah Enginerring propose mobile offshore base see on DSA 2016 much better solution。future Mindef can consider it. put 2 in semporna 1 in Sandakan offshore。


Damn it looks big!
The ships are old. If it saves money to decom then, we should. Similar to UK Armed Forces, suck up a capability gap for 5-10 years then come back into the game with a bigger wallet
This post has been edited by KLboy92: Nov 16 2016, 05:33 PM