I shoot mainly family photos. If there's a reason to go FF it would be the ISO advantage alone, so I can shoot comfortably at 6,400 to 12,800 (if there is a need to). Old people don't like the flash.

If you're going to FF, do make sure to splurge on lens as well. It's equally important.

I think TS just want some justification why need to buy FF before he decides to buy one.

Buy before your trip ma. Can test 99
Boss where you been lately? No posting at reno forum?
Btw which FF camera you going for?

For holiday photo i would recommend smaller sensor like apsc and m43, even down to 1''.  Partly because light weight and you want to get everything in focus. Of course, FF still better if you know what you doing at what setting but bear in mind the shallow depth of field can be annoying. Already heard complaint from some amateurs owning FF that background blur so much when taking shots at their gf/family in front.

Judging from your photos in HK....ya, would really recommend apsc or m43 camera first or at least learn a bit of composition, white balancing, and exposure settings. And as suspected, you didn't control the shallow depth of field much on the FF, like at all. Did you just go full aperture the entire trip? In contrast, your cameron highland trip with LX3 looks so much better.

2 FF body on a trip? Wow you must have a lot of strength to carry both like that. Yeah as what DaddyO says, the WB and the exposure is way off but maybe you like warmer colors. I know some people do that on purpose.

But really begs the question, if you already have 2 FF bodies why this thread? 

Very nice pics bro
Actually a lot better than most here...lol 

bro... ur HK photos... somehow i feel like alot overexpose, not that its a crime but... to bright for me.

Fine dining restaurant allow u to take photo with flash?    (err usually i just pump ISO) haha.

but generally, some nice photos there 

just my comment bro... dont take it seriously

some photos... when looking at it    i feel pening hahaha