Better low light and bokehliciousness on FF, even for FB post only. And stop using "was". It still "is".

What is your max "comfortable" (not technical maximum) iso you can shoot with your apsc? I can "comfortably" go up to iso 6400 on FF. It can comfortably go further up to 12000 on newer body.

Not really sure what is your real question about? Are you thinking of buying D600/D800 and just need good reason to buy one?

errr.....no.1 is not necessary true depending on the res on the FF.

FF has its own place depending on what you plan to shoot. Portrait & landscape looks better on FF due to its easier to isolate subject and less distortion cause you can use longer focal lens. If you primarily shoot wildlife and sports, apsc is preferable to get that extra reach and megapixel per sensor area resolution count.

I think TS just want some justification why need to buy FF before he decides to buy one.

36MP on APSC sensor can be done. They already did it with 41MP on Nokia phone (much smaller than APSC). Just that I haven't seen anything above 28Mp APSC (samsung NX1) yet.

Actually somebody did some test and true enough shorter focal tend to give more distortion so even if field of view is the same. But that really depends on lens quality which may offset the distortion.

This post has been edited by DaddyO: Aug 31 2016, 09:23 AM

For holiday photo i would recommend smaller sensor like apsc and m43, even down to 1''. Partly because light weight and you want to get everything in focus. Of course, FF still better if you know what you doing at what setting but bear in mind the shallow depth of field can be annoying. Already heard complaint from some amateurs owning FF that background blur so much when taking shots at their gf/family in front.

Judging from your photos in HK....ya, would really recommend apsc or m43 camera first or at least learn a bit of composition, white balancing, and exposure settings. And as suspected, you didn't control the shallow depth of field much on the FF, like at all. Did you just go full aperture the entire trip? In contrast, your cameron highland trip with LX3 looks so much better.

Yes but iso performance and af is rather meh on older model at that price point. If you do plan to get one, mainly for bokehliciousness.