Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 25 26 27 28 29 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

English Clubs Chelsea FC - The Shed V41, BPL - Man City 1 - 3 Chelsea

views
     
adj3
post Sep 12 2016, 01:02 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jul 2014

Conte need to sacrifice oscar or matic

If not this chelsea team only play with clueless chicken

Run the ball until sideline

Lol
Ichighost
post Sep 12 2016, 01:03 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
358 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Oxpod



QUOTE(adj3 @ Sep 12 2016, 02:02 AM)
Conte need to sacrifice oscar or matic

If not this chelsea team only play with clueless chicken

Run the ball until sideline

Lol
*
well better than clueless post like this.

cheers!

biggrin.gif
our_team89
post Sep 12 2016, 01:04 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
960 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


QUOTE(Kerplunk @ Sep 12 2016, 01:01 AM)
Can't believe we didn't put this game to bed. I think our gameplay lacked intensity and better finishing.

That was a clear foul on cahill and it cost us. Worryingly JT looks set for a spell on the sidelines and zouma isn't fully fit yet. Oh well. Looks like a baptism of fire for luiz vs liverpool.

Paul parker and that moronic pundit on astro taking potshots at us for 'going down' too easy and the ref missing that foul on 'purpose.' probably still sore after city give them a footballing lesson at old trafford rolleyes.gif
*
the fox sports pundits always moron one rolleyes.gif
kucingmainan
post Sep 12 2016, 01:07 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
289 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: Sinai Peninsula


QUOTE(Ichighost @ Sep 12 2016, 01:01 AM)
first..easy win? nonsense.

Fabregas was effective because he is a fresh leg..so no one really closing him down giving more time to deliver great passes.

second, where will he play?

Kante, Oscar and Matic all solid.

Conte's selection was justified, maybe subs timing a little bit late..but it can go either way..so I prefer to stick to Conte's decision.
*
come on man. give credit where its due. he done better in that 15mins than matic in 75. even oscar didnt create much + poor finishing.

losing points in this kind of winnable game will cost us the UCL spot.
Ichighost
post Sep 12 2016, 01:09 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
358 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Oxpod



on the bright side,

last season if we conceded 2 goals back to back..we definitely will lost the game..

but this season under Conte, we fight back.


zoidx_chung
post Sep 12 2016, 01:10 AM

道可道,非常道!
*****
Senior Member
791 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


QUOTE(adj3 @ Sep 12 2016, 12:55 AM)
U all should blame this conte

So stubborn to not play fabregas

When fabregas in chelsea bcome more lively

Easy win go to drain

Lol
*
QUOTE(kucingmainan @ Sep 12 2016, 12:58 AM)
how are we going to defend vs coutinho and co.?

we severely lacking in creativity. fab come on and spark more creativity. why cant conte see that?

willian a passenger for the whole time. freekick also macam cibai.

1 point vs swansea is disappointing.
*
if wanna play fab, our back four must be solid, cannot depend on kante only
after matic out, only kante to cover back 4 and swansea took the advantage
the starting 11 is based on one fact, our back 4 is shit....
david luiz maybe is the key to unleash fab, who knows?

This post has been edited by zoidx_chung: Sep 12 2016, 01:12 AM
Kerplunk
post Sep 12 2016, 01:11 AM

Enthusiast
Group Icon
Elite
802 posts

Joined: Nov 2007


QUOTE(jiachunn @ Sep 12 2016, 01:00 AM)
What I learnt in this match...
Iva will start again in next game...
*
Credit where its due mate. This is one of those few games where he actually looked better than azpi. Sounds crazy right? But that's what happened. I think the latter looked leggy and was beaten by his man for too easily.

Most importantly,Iva's cross was what lead to our opening goal when it caused havoc in their box,and his powerful shot lead to our equaliser! Very good game by the serbian today,imo.
Ichighost
post Sep 12 2016, 01:12 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
358 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Oxpod



QUOTE(kucingmainan @ Sep 12 2016, 02:07 AM)
come on man. give credit where its due. he done better in that 15mins than matic in 75. even oscar didnt create much + poor finishing.

losing points in this kind of winnable game will cost us the UCL spot.
*
I'm not saying that Cesc is no good, I was stating the reason why he look standout when he came in..

He will deliver if he start the game no doubt about it, but it wont be as what we've seen in the last 15 mins.

and you are blind if you say that Matic and Oscar didn't do much in this game.

yeahh I know, losing points is sucked, but early in the season..and silly mistakes, give them a chance.
kucingmainan
post Sep 12 2016, 01:14 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
289 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: Sinai Peninsula


QUOTE(zoidx_chung @ Sep 12 2016, 01:10 AM)
if wanna play fab, our back four must be solid, cannot depend on kante only
after matic out, only kante to cover back 4 and swansea took the advantage
david luiz maybe is the key to unleash fab, who knows?
*
i doubt cesc will ever start a league match under conte. hope he prove me wrong.

vs swansea, deploy 2 ultra defensive midfield and 1 defensive minded AM is too much imo. should hv sub willian earlier also. doing nothing for 75mins.
adj3
post Sep 12 2016, 01:14 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jul 2014

QUOTE(Ichighost @ Sep 12 2016, 01:03 AM)
well better than clueless post like this.

cheers!

biggrin.gif
*
Clueless lol

B4 fab in chelsea alwaysor only play wide bcos no one can make through ball from mid

Oscar n matic cant deliver such ball

After fab in chelsea have more variation of passing can go wide or mid

N costa cant really drible, he better with on the run ball, that y fabregas needed

But if fabregas needed, chelsea will sacrifice def, sebab fab ni malas

Lol


Ichighost
post Sep 12 2016, 01:19 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
358 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Oxpod



QUOTE(adj3 @ Sep 12 2016, 02:14 AM)
Clueless lol

B4 fab in chelsea alwaysor only  play wide bcos no one can make through ball from mid

Oscar n matic cant deliver such ball

After fab in chelsea have more variation of passing can go wide or mid

N costa cant really drible, he better with on the run ball, that y fabregas needed

But if fabregas needed, chelsea will sacrifice def, sebab fab ni malas

Lol
*
good call on Fabregas passing style. I do agree.

but the main reason why I think Cesc cant really start unless we fix our defence.

Cesc is a pin point passer, ala Pirlo. He wont do the defensive duties as much as Matic and Kante.

Matic and Kate needed to protect the old back four.

That is why the signing of Alonso and Luiz will rejuvenate our back four and we can afford to play Cesc in place of Matic.

Just like Conte's sub.
kucingmainan
post Sep 12 2016, 01:21 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
289 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: Sinai Peninsula


QUOTE(Ichighost @ Sep 12 2016, 01:12 AM)
I'm not saying that Cesc is no good, I was stating the reason why he look standout when he came in..

He will deliver if he start the game no doubt about it, but it wont be as what we've seen in the last 15 mins.

and you are blind if you say that Matic and Oscar didn't do much in this game.

yeahh I know, losing points is sucked, but early in the season..and silly mistakes, give them a chance.
*
havent start any premier league game yet. how to know he cant deliver?

not much contribution imo. hazard is the one that do all the running and creating chances. the only time oscar contribute is when he assist the first goal. matic play too high up for a defensive midfielder. he even play higher than costa once. which is a waste.


zoidx_chung
post Sep 12 2016, 01:22 AM

道可道,非常道!
*****
Senior Member
791 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


QUOTE(adj3 @ Sep 12 2016, 01:14 AM)
Clueless lol

B4 fab in chelsea alwaysor only  play wide bcos no one can make through ball from mid

Oscar n matic cant deliver such ball

After fab in chelsea have more variation of passing can go wide or mid

N costa cant really drible, he better with on the run ball, that y fabregas needed

But if fabregas needed, chelsea will sacrifice def, sebab fab ni malas

Lol
*
Fab malas? Lol
He covered most distance in our team last season
He is hardworking, just cannot defend
adj3
post Sep 12 2016, 01:24 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jul 2014

QUOTE(Ichighost @ Sep 12 2016, 01:19 AM)
good call on Fabregas passing style. I do agree.

but the main reason why I think Cesc cant really start unless we fix our defence.

Cesc is a pin point passer, ala Pirlo. He wont do the defensive duties as much as Matic and Kante.

Matic and Kate needed to protect the old back four.

That is why the signing of Alonso and Luiz will rejuvenate our back four and we can afford to play Cesc in place of Matic.

Just like Conte's sub.
*
Matic have been mis position few time in the game

More like attacking mid

He not good in that position




Ichighost
post Sep 12 2016, 01:26 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
358 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Oxpod



QUOTE(kucingmainan @ Sep 12 2016, 02:21 AM)
havent start any premier league game yet. how to know he cant deliver?

not much contribution imo. hazard is the one that do all the running and creating chances. the only time oscar contribute is when he assist the first goal. matic play too high up for a defensive midfielder. he even play higher than costa once. which is a waste.
*
I said that he will deliver. Sigh~

my original point was, Cesc look better and effective because he came in late in the game, opponent players were tired to close down giving him more time on the ball to deliver great passes. That is all.

not sure which part of the statement that we are arguing about.

oscar and matic was all over the pitch, matic was not defensive midfielder, his role is box-to box with a good defensive skill. to win ball higher in the pitch and yes box to box sometimes play higher than striker, ie Lampard.

Kerplunk
post Sep 12 2016, 01:29 AM

Enthusiast
Group Icon
Elite
802 posts

Joined: Nov 2007


I actually disagreed with the oscar sub. Willian off should've probably happened earlier though. Matic off is understandable as well. Dropped points but perhaps a good kick up our arses before the liverpool match. Would love to see fab starting.

Perhaps Iva in for JT in the middle and alonso going to the left, with azpi on his natural side?
zoidx_chung
post Sep 12 2016, 01:31 AM

道可道,非常道!
*****
Senior Member
791 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


QUOTE(Kerplunk @ Sep 12 2016, 01:29 AM)
I actually disagreed with the oscar sub. Willian off should've probably happened earlier though. Matic off is understandable as well. Dropped points but perhaps a good kick up our arses before the liverpool match. Would love to see fab starting.

Perhaps Iva in for JT in the middle and alonso going to the left, with azpi on his natural side?
*
Then next game you will see Iva still at right
Hahaha
Ichighost
post Sep 12 2016, 01:35 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
358 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Oxpod



5-4-1 defensive, 3-4-3 attacking.

come on conte, do this against pool.


yinchet
post Sep 12 2016, 01:39 AM

If you wish for peace, prepare for war
Group Icon
Elite
1,157 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Petaling Jaya

Cahill oh cahill.
So next game luiz-terry partnership again.
Will fabregas given chance on next game. hmm.gif
zoidx_chung
post Sep 12 2016, 01:40 AM

道可道,非常道!
*****
Senior Member
791 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


QUOTE(yinchet @ Sep 12 2016, 01:39 AM)
Cahill oh cahill.
So next game luiz-terry partnership again.
Will fabregas given chance on next game. hmm.gif
*
Against Liverpool?
Don't think so

126 Pages « < 25 26 27 28 29 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0169sec    0.63    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 03:14 PM