Let me get this straight. Disputer wants satisfaction, u say, 'u can take away my safe trader tag n put me on the MO, we do that, disputer is happy. Now u r saying screw the disputer i'm not happy? U know u told us to punish that way if it made the disputer happy. Now u tell we should have not punished u that way n used our heads to come up with lesser punishment because the first one u suggest is unfair.

As RBR said, ask the disputer to come in here n say that he forgives u enough to have ur safe trader tag returned n ur name removed from the MO list.

Joshua_0718, so ur is vote off the island? lol

Well this will help other appriciate the Safe Trader Tag more.

imperialrealcs, omg. Yes, maybe some safe traders FFK some ppl and they handle the situation with those people to that party's satisfaction so those cases were never brought up here.

You on the other hand didn't. The seller was still not happy and you loftily offered up your safe trader tag.

How does that translate to us? This is what it sounds like: 'The offence is minor that I can offer my ST tag and suggest to be entered in the MO list. I mean I only FFK him FGS. They'll never do it for something like that.'

"mod, i'm ready to be in Minor Offence with some warning for my offences sweat.gif" = MO = did not "adhere to a high level of conduct when doing transactions" = no Safe Trader Tag.

"soo thats y i've said many times in my previous post that u can give me warning n put me into whatever list as suggested.." - removal of Safe Trader Tag not warning enough? And u're on the MO list.

First off, you treated the dispute LIGHTLY and acted THE FOOL by saying no, OFFERING yourself for punishment. You FLAUNTED your arrogance in our faces what you expect us to do? You are made an example of what it means to "adhere to a high level of conduct".



uglyvamp explained from top to bottom the whole process. He then offered compensation "And every missing items u have, I'll Re-send again at my own cost. Or refund at my own cost & even pay u back the psotage money."

As to saying he surrandered his Safe Trader Tag "Safe Trader or not Safe Trader, its fine with me. it was automatically presented by the admins the moment they enforced the new system, and i thank them for that without applying for it.", it reads that if we remove the Safe Trader Tag after the explaination and compensation offered then he is fine by the decision.

Corruption? You are asking us to be corrupt by breaking the rules we laid down. We even told you the correct OPTION on reversing the circumstances that you are in. But you still argued that the matter was minor and of not importantance thus making dandan refuse any CONCILIATION.

Now a last point for you to understand, any matter brought up in the Dispute Resolution Corner, no matter how small is still treated by us with the utmost importantance. If the disputer is satistified at the solution present or that the guilty party proves their innocence than all is well. If not then of course we will take the action available to us.

Absolute power? Corruption? You either have not been here long enough to see how we work or don't understand the words or just don't appreciate the effect that goes into running, maintaining, a free forum where traders can do businesses with relative confidence and safety. By all means should you know a better way to run such a forum, please by all means open one and lets see how you fair at the helm.

"You are by what you do you."

*anyhow, i do seeking for ansewr for all those contradiction that i stated* work out your own contridictions before asking us to work out our's.

*sorry if u get my meaning wrongly.. what i wanted to say is the way how u work is corrupt* = "you're not corrupt, only the way you do things is."