But if the other party forgives you, I am prepared to reinstate your tag upon review. That said, I appreciate your candour in admitting fault quickly enough
Dissactifaction on action took on me, help
| Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed New Topic New Poll |
Dissactifaction on action took on me, help
|
|
Jan 24 2007, 11:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
|
VIP
3,107 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney |
Well, you asked for it to be in the MO list, so I did just that. If you're a MO, you obviously can't hold the Safe Trader tag. Its just too contradictory. So that has to go too.
But if the other party forgives you, I am prepared to reinstate your tag upon review. That said, I appreciate your candour in admitting fault quickly enough |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2007, 09:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
VIP
3,107 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney |
QUOTE(March05 @ Jan 26 2007, 02:06 PM) I would like to have this explication clarified. Does this mean that any one who loses his ST tag during a dispute can have it back if he resolves his dispute? May have it back, depending on the circumstances. A resolved dispute is where both parties are amicable in the solution. |
|
|
Jan 29 2007, 07:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
VIP
3,107 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney |
I'm not familiar with the uglyvamp case, but the "he did it and got away with it, so I should too" excuse doesn't work here.
We may be harsh, and its probably against public opinion, but if we reinstate your safe trader tag it'll make a mockery of our stringent rules for even getting the tag. |
|
|
Jan 31 2007, 10:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
VIP
3,107 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney |
QUOTE(imperialrealcs @ Jan 30 2007, 12:56 AM) agreed.. afterall, this dispute corner is a funny 1 coz mod can simply strip people's tag juz because the opposing side wanted to without further discussion.. No, mod stripped your tag because you asked for it to be stripped. You also admitted fault. Not because the other party requested. You did. so my conclusion here is mod doesnt really do consideration based on the severity of offence.. QUOTE mod, i'm ready to be in Minor Offence with some warning for my offences sweat.gif QUOTE soo thats y i've said many times in my previous post that u can give me warning n put me into whatever list as suggested.. Then, mod did consideration. Mod looked at safe trader factors:- http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/111861 QUOTE # The tag is not just a tag, it would mean that you will have to adhere to a high level of conduct when doing transactions whether it be buying or selling. Failure to live up to the tag will result in it being removed, and if you loose it, you will never get it back. Even though your offence is not very severe, it is still sufficient to warrant removal of the Safe Trader tag. How would the other people unsuccessful in their applications feel when they see someone like you who have admitted to committing an offence (and is in the MO list as a result of that) get to keep your tag? This post has been edited by RBR: Jan 31 2007, 10:19 AM |
|
|
Feb 1 2007, 08:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
VIP
3,107 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney |
I don't get paid to strip your safe trader tag. Now you've really made us pissed by
This issue is settled as far as I'm concerned. |
|
|
Feb 1 2007, 10:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
VIP
3,107 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney |
QUOTE(imperialrealcs @ Feb 1 2007, 10:49 AM) Yes because you've accused me of being corrupt when I got no money from anybody to tend to your little dispute. So now I don't care about your case anymore. I have better things to do. So blame yourself. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0186sec
1.59
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 12:12 PM |