QUOTE(knwong @ Sep 2 2016, 11:50 AM)
What constitute as unnecessary entry? From business point of view if client able to pay why should I reject?
The problem is, the lounge, and the bank are separate entities...the bank wants to give its customers benefits when they travel....but of course will not agree to misuse, ie using lounge access when not travelling...
On the other hand, every customer the lounge admit, it's income....either from direct payment, or through affinity partners, eg airlines, pp, cc etc...so lounges don't really care how many times people use their facilities, the more the better....
Lounges within airside locations have no problem with abuse....only bone fide passengers will have access....but those landside will potentially be subject to abuse...and if the lounges don't control entry, the bank will find some people with 20, 50 entries...it cost the bank money, so they will clamp down and impose restrictions...
Same principle as when people abuse motor insurance claims, insurance companies increase premium, and everybody surfers....