Looking for 1 too, thanks for sharing.

Thanks for sharing.

Yup,he told me got car standby for me before I booked🤓
From JB Wang Loo

JB Wang Loo😊

Thx for adding 😁😁😁

I got my car in a week too. if they told me it would be a lemon I rather not have it. maybe not even buy it. I have a long list.

Defects on honda car is due to poor QC at alor gajah factory. It is a norm for tidak apa working attitude in honda malaysia.

yo guys.. thinking of getting this pedal lock:
https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2324118

can we use this? i rmb reading some1 say our remote start cannot have our pedal locked?
anyone can confirm this before i buy?

Low grade fuels have negative impact on Nikasil coated engine liners and components. Nikadil coating is a technological advancement offering low friction and heat with low tolerances. But even German engineers got it wrong with durability with high sulfur fuel.

The 1.5T uses a special low friction ion coated piston rings for the same purpose. It's long term effects with low grade high sulfur content fuel remains to be seen.

From Wikipedia -

Porsche started using this on the 1970 917 race car, and later on the 1973 911 RS. Porsche also used it on production cars, but for a short time switched to Alusil due to cost savings for their base 911. Nikasil cylinders were always used for the 911 Turbo and RS models. Nikasil coated aluminium cylinders allowed Porsche to build air-cooled engines that had the highest specific output of any engine of their time. Nikasil is still used in today's 911s.

Nikasil was very popular in the 1990s. It was used by companies such as Audi, Ducati, BMW, Ferrari, Jaguar and Moto Guzzi in their new engine families. However, the sulfur found in much of the world's low-quality gasoline caused some Nikasil cylinders to break down over time, causing costly engine failures.[3]

No worry, i install almost similar pedal lock.
It work, you only can start the power but not the engine without unlock

Hot AC blows and beeping sound of HU units u blame it to QC, something is really wrong with you Lah bro

but remote start should switch on engine and aircon rite ?

Go read ford, bmw, Benz, proton car club forums

just that civic forum TS too hardworking spell out the problem in first page compare to other brand

I don't usually read forums unless I have issues. I speak from experience. I have all the marquee above & few more. very minor issues that I can just close my eyes & forget about it.

Wow Dude, You must be rich enough not to have at least a bit of regret/depression about your 140K plus investment.

I know its never be a perfect car in the world but at least for a guy who want to upgrade himself from Proton I wish not been bother with all this small small defect anymore..
The time consuming...Hmmm

There is no such thing as a perfect car. If u expect to buy a car with no problems, then ure in for a surprise. Best stick to public transport or walking.

And why should I have any regrets just because my car had some issues? Isn't that why we have warranties for? And if problems crop up and the manufacturer can resolve them quickly enough, then what's the big fuss except for time spent at the service centre?

Btw, what 140K+ 'investment' are you referring to anyway?

lol a car doesn't seems to be an investment

Some basic info on the various fuel standards FYI

Euro 1 – 1992 (sulphur content 2,500ppm)
Euro 2 – 1996 (500ppm)
Euro 3 – 2000 (350ppm)
BHP RON95 – 131 ppm
Euro 4 – 2005 (50ppm)
Euro 5 – 2009 (10ppm)
Euro 6 – 2014 (very low)

Ppm = quantity of sulphur (mg) in 1kg of fuel

Negative effects of Euro 2 fuel:

1) High sulphur content produces significant amount of Sulphur Dioxide resulting in Sulphurous and Sulphuric Acids
2) The presence of the sulphuric acids cause:-
3) Contamination of crankcase oil / lubricating oil
4) Corrosion of engine components / parts
5) Catalytic converter is damaged and is unable to neutralise pollutants ( CO, NOx & Unburnt Fuel )
6) SOX contribute to the high emission of particulate matter.
7) Decreases the cetane number resulting in incomplete combustion and the formation of soot.
8) Injector tips are obstructed with the formation of soot.
9) Injection spray pattern is altered resulting in incomplete combustion.
10) Significant reduction in the lifetime of the engine.
11) Increases maintenance costs due to frequent replacement of engine oil and servicing parts


Benefits of Euro 4 fuel:

1) Insignificant formation of SOx /acidic compounds
2) Decrease of particulate matter/Black smoke
3) Reduces output of Oxides of Nitrogen
4) Increase cetane number result in complete/efficient combustion
5) No unburned fuel
6) CO is easily converted into CO2
7) Engine lubricating oil less prone to acidification
8) Reduces engine component corrosion
9) Increase of lifespan of catalytic converter
10) Engine less noisy
11) Engine develops more power
12) Increase of lifetime of the engine
13) Increase in fuel economy
14) Reduces maintenance cost due to insignificant contamination of engine oil and service interval can be increased
15) Eco friendly fuel

We should be getting Euro 4 RON95 fuel in a couple of years which isn't too far away to cause significant detriment to our car engines using current Euro 2 RON95 fuel. But in the meantime, I would strongly recommend BHP RON95. It's the best RON95 fuel in the market currently. Some batches of BHP's RON95 fuel was even tested to be only 12ppm which is almost Euro 5 standard.

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Aug 2 2016, 09:12 AM

Actually if they are averaging 131ppm vs 500ppm Euro2 spec, I would consider that is quite good. Too bad we don't have consumer or motoring association carrying out random sampling to inform us of the industry average.

I'm also a BHP user, unless its too out of the way. One nice thing about the bigger fuel tank and increase fuel efficiency of this car, now I can get by only fueling up over the weekends and dont have to fill up at other random stations