Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Recommended monitor for budget below RM1,000, For Gaming

views
     
TSkzflame
post Jul 11 2016, 09:21 AM, updated 10y ago

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
191 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


Hello guys. Any suggested monitor for budget bellow RM1,000?
Currently using 24" Samsung A300 but failed me after the warranty period.
I need a budget gaming monitor just sufficient without effect on my gaming.

Considering on 24" or 27"
Thanks in advance. notworthy.gif
meon55
post Jul 11 2016, 09:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
226 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: KayElle / PeeJay



You can try BenQ RL2755HM or RL2455HM which is a 1ms Gaming monitor which are both below. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCj1RBfZhG0


danshi
post Jul 11 2016, 09:44 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
190 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
You can also look at Acer XB240H. I'm currently using it and found the monitor has great performance for money. It is 144Hz monitor hence it can deliver a very good fast moving image/graphics provided your GC supports it.
TSkzflame
post Jul 12 2016, 09:15 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
191 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(meon55 @ Jul 11 2016, 09:36 AM)
You can try BenQ RL2755HM or RL2455HM which is a 1ms Gaming monitor which are both below. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCj1RBfZhG0
*
Thinking of the 27" would it be kinda big by ur experience?

QUOTE(danshi @ Jul 11 2016, 09:44 AM)
You can also look at Acer XB240H. I'm currently using it and found the monitor has great performance for money. It is 144Hz monitor hence it can deliver a very good fast moving image/graphics provided your GC supports it.
*
Thanks, will consider about it
meon55
post Jul 12 2016, 12:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
226 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: KayElle / PeeJay



QUOTE(kzflame @ Jul 12 2016, 09:15 AM)
Thinking of the 27" would it be kinda big by ur experience?
Thanks, will consider about it
*
I dont think 27 is big... both 27 and 24 are just nice. Besides Gaming, you will have more screen space for other things with larger monitors.
TSkzflame
post Jul 12 2016, 02:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
191 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(meon55 @ Jul 12 2016, 12:07 PM)
I dont think 27 is big... both 27 and 24 are just nice. Besides Gaming, you will have more screen space for other things with larger monitors.
*
I see, anyways just wanna ask i saw some TV side 32" above which cost around 1k. would it be a better choice?
meon55
post Jul 13 2016, 10:11 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
226 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: KayElle / PeeJay



QUOTE(kzflame @ Jul 12 2016, 02:16 PM)
I see, anyways just wanna ask i saw some TV side 32" above which cost around 1k. would it be a better choice?
*
I think TV is slower compared to Gaming monitor. When I play games on my LG TV, i feel there is a little ghost or movement blur. Thats why i switched to Gaming Monitor for the smoothness.
goldfries
post Jul 13 2016, 11:51 AM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(kzflame @ Jul 12 2016, 02:16 PM)
I see, anyways just wanna ask i saw some TV side 32" above which cost around 1k. would it be a better choice?
I use 40" TV for gaming BUT only with PS4 and on approximately 8" sitting distance.

You're looking at 24" means you're using on table, so I recommend that you go with what meon55 suggested.

A 32" TV seems great but do note that it is just the size, some 32" give you only HD. Even if Full HD, the pixel per inch count would be horrible. You can't even view small text properly.

Furthermore a monitor will give you overall more control over the display output.



TSkzflame
post Jul 13 2016, 11:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
191 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(meon55 @ Jul 13 2016, 10:11 AM)
I think TV is slower compared to Gaming monitor. When I play games on my LG TV, i feel there is a little ghost or movement blur. Thats why i switched to Gaming Monitor for the smoothness.
*
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jul 13 2016, 11:51 AM)
I use 40" TV for gaming BUT only with PS4 and on approximately 8" sitting distance.

You're looking at 24" means you're using on table, so I recommend that you go with what meon55 suggested.

A 32" TV seems great but do note that it is just the size, some 32" give you only HD. Even if Full HD, the pixel per inch count would be horrible. You can't even view small text properly.

Furthermore a monitor will give you overall more control over the display output.
*
For what i heard is TV disadvantage is reading text. but basically i game alot so i think its ok, worries me is the tv input lag which is important for gaming.. i search some model on lazada doesn't seems to have data on the internet which they research on overseas sad.gif
Skylinestar
post Jul 14 2016, 12:55 AM

Mega Duck
********
All Stars
10,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak
for gaming, make sure u get 144hz screen. else you'll live with 60hz vsync - stutter and lag
meon55
post Jul 14 2016, 09:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
226 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: KayElle / PeeJay



QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Jul 14 2016, 12:55 AM)
for gaming, make sure u get 144hz screen. else you'll live with 60hz vsync - stutter and lag
*
Yupe... totally agree. Poorfag like me cannot afford 144hz screen hahaha... The screen lag is very noticeable when you play games like CSgo.
TSkzflame
post Jul 14 2016, 09:57 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
191 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Jul 14 2016, 12:55 AM)
for gaming, make sure u get 144hz screen. else you'll live with 60hz vsync - stutter and lag
*
QUOTE(meon55 @ Jul 14 2016, 09:51 AM)
Yupe... totally agree. Poorfag like me cannot afford 144hz screen hahaha... The screen lag is very noticeable when you play games like CSgo.
*
I guess 1k range cant get 144hz sad.gif Monitor for me then

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0157sec    0.41    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 09:01 AM