TS bodoh. Macai DAP dan PAN.
news putar alam basi tahun 2015 nak recycle sini.
and idiots macai DAP in /k too dumb to discern it.
Hadi says WSJ must produce 4 witnesses News
|
|
 Jul 8 2016, 03:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
6 posts Joined: Feb 2013 
|
|
Quote|
|
Jul 8 2016, 05:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
6 posts Joined: Feb 2013
|
QUOTE(hjab @ Jul 8 2016, 04:51 PM) it was actually the no 1 most accessed news on malaymail website today even before TS is stupid enough to fall for that trap and reproduce it here, treating it like something new when Tony Pua and Nga Kor Ming had been using old spin articles from Malaymail to stoke hatred towards PAS, what can you expect of the common DAP macais? its a no brainer that TS is so stupid.now i remember, yesterday's no 1 most accessed news was najib's urge to umno members to emulate isis's struggle, 2 years ago punya news who in the hell would gali all those old news, to the extent that it becomes the most accessed article? something is really wrong here, either an act of sabotage by the malaymail staff who cannot go home for cuti raya, or somebody(with the help of some bots) is onto something sinister trying to stoke some fire  |
|
|
Jul 8 2016, 05:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
6 posts Joined: Feb 2013
|
QUOTE(joe_mamak @ Jul 8 2016, 05:16 PM) Or just a glitch. Sebarang tuduhan dan dakwaan salah laku yang dilemparkan kepada Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak perlu berasas dan dikemukakan saksi.Anyway, it is old news. And it appears that he did say it. So, stoke what? PS Hadi said 2 saksi, not 4 though. Menurut Presiden PAS, Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang, Najib bukannya malaikat tetapi manusia biasa dan tuduhan yang dilemparkan mestilah dikemukakan saksi yang mengesahkan dakwaan itu. “Pendirian kita pendirian Islam. Kalau tuduhan kes liwat Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim kena ada empat saksi, sama juga dengan tuduhan ke atas Najib, kena ada saksi juga…saksi yang adil. he did say SAKSI. 4 saksi for Anwar's case. SAKSI for Najib's 1MDB's case. if the case is solid enough, what is so difficult to get the SAKSI? but first the 1MDB case needs to be properly investigated by the government, then the investigating party.parties will be the SAKSI. Hadi was saying that the 1MDB must be investigated, and charged with the SAKSI yang mengesahkan dakwaan. what is so hard to understand? Hadi was only asking for Najib and 1MDB to be investigated, which the government was not doing properly until that time (July 2015). unless your intention is to spin to make it appears bad to Hadi. or you are a macai whose brain is so twisted to not be able to digest the writings properly. |
|
|
Jul 8 2016, 11:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
6 posts Joined: Feb 2013
|
QUOTE(joe_mamak @ Jul 8 2016, 10:37 PM) LOL My intention? To make Hadi look bad? Nah........I was just pointing out it could have been a glitch. And wondering what's the big deal with it? It is old news after all. Why do you guys feel the need to defend Hadi so much? Oh, there you go shooting off without asking question first. "Macai, brain so twisted, etc. etc." Here, my response from last year - https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...post&p=75284086 What do you have to say now?  QUOTE(joe_mamak @ Jul 7 2015, 06:02 PM) They didn't infer. They took what they wanted to make a captivating headline. ok so you are not a twisted brain macai afterall |
| Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic |
| Change to: |  0.0169sec
 0.79
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 09:00 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.