argghhh.... there's still no F1 game in x360 ! hopefully next year EA F1's will have for x360..
but lucky,those motogp series are on x360.

This post has been edited by msn83235502: Dec 17 2007, 06:04 PM

oh yes but u have to spend your entire savings to earn a console's graphics

I agree that xbox360 has a better graphic CURRENTLY ! But Always ?? No, I cannot agree on that. You will not know what will happen in the future, as of now, developer has problem understanding the Cell Processor. But once they master it, who dare to say PS3 will not have the edge ? And last but not least, graphics is not all about a gaming console, look at Wii.

Fan boy? LOL.

All I'm saying is PS3 is the best entertainment system you will ever get for a good price.

Don't you see. MS only care about how much they earn. Their Xbox live, games, market place. Most of them you must pay to obtain exclude the game

While PS3 is free except for the games.

PS3 just need a good game. Once many good game for PS3, then PS3 will win Xbox 360.

And your a Nintendo fan boy. I have no comment about Nintendo because the console is a next gen of way to play games.

If you still want who wins, I say Pc. Spent less 10k on it you will get a superior system compare to those.

i don't want to argue that if u favor x360 and u want to use x360 than just playing games, it's true that it gonna cost u...

considering the price(for now) between x360 and ps3 - which rm50 - rm70 different... i wouldn't mind paying for LIVE subscription which 12 month + 1... and theres a lot of games to buy...

which mean... if that games is multiplatform... im going for x360. I only go 4 ps3 as long it not playable on x360...

im just frustrated to hear that it sound like everyone can afford expensive machine not to mention more expensive games(but it the same games) because i know some of my friends bought a ps3 but played it on crt tv and when asked why don't buy a lcd tv? all money spend to ps3 and he need to save for future games and sometimes starving ...

talked about MS only care about how much they earn... SONY is well known to sell the most expensive gadget but actually compare to other brand which cost cheaper, it just like adidas shirt or pant is expensive because "3 stripes" on it...

thanks God x360 is exist... if not how much u gonna spend to buy brand new ps3?

P.S. this post is not directly for MmxZero... it's general. Sorry if i offense someone.

Believe me, cell will not make game prettier. Aabsolutely not in this generation. It does have potential for more parallel processing stuff, like more realistic AI, physic, sounds, etc.

The beauty of 360 is that it is a balance machine with accessible power/performance. This doesn't means that it cannot be squeezed for more performance.

Lets wait another 1 or 2 years, I believe that even then, the difference between 360 & PS3 in whatever areas will not be noticeable.

Cheers!



Afterthought:
Microsoft has great platform (Life, Xbox 360 Operating System), Sony has great hardware (Cell & hardware stability that rocks) and WII has great IPs (controller, creative games). Imagine a world where all of them work together and the console is PSWII360. But that will never happen!

Another afterthought:
Microsoft has not always wanted to be in the console business. Originally they just want to provide the platform. Sega Dreamcast is using Windows CE as the OS. Microsoft once approach Nintendo to use windows as console operating system. But got rejected. Imagine if that goes through .

Dude, you're no fun. I'm trying to have an argument with you, and you're coming across all polite and shit... boo

Anyways, consoles live and die by their game library. People like M$ and Sony spend big bucks wooing publishers to develop games for their console, even better if the title is an exclusive. With the PS2, it was so far ahead of everyone else at the time, it wasn't even a fair fight. The PS2 may just be the best console of all time. People still publish games for the PS2, how great is that?

To me, the PS3 is expensive. PS3 games cost £10 more than 360 games. The console itself is £60 more. If you read any game-centric website, you will also know that developers find it a bit harder to create games for the PS3. Something to do with the dev platform. Also, how many good exclusives does the PS3 have? Heavenly Sword? Drake's Fortune? Not exactly must plays... A new final fantasy would be nice, but then again how many people still enjoy playing the FF series?

Getting out of subject here. Sorry for rambling. PS3 may be better hardware wise, but the games aren't there yet, and may never will. So right now, the 360 is a better bet.

yeah, you're right. PS3 is too state of the art where ppl nowadays buy it to play lots of games not buying it for just enjoying with only a few games......xbox360 is the best bet for everyone

ko punya machine dah okay ke?

u are quite right about 360's game library over ps3..
but 360 isnt without its own flaw..
the 3ROD which has yet to be solved.. remains a big headache..
of coz this might not be so much of a problem if ur in USA or SG
but looking at the fact that we are in malaysia.. its really a huge put off..