Edifgrto, lay off the rhetoric arguments here. If you feel like taking this on further with dear unknown here, do it in Kopitiam with him or better still start a missive by PM'ing him, unless you do have some dissatisfaction which you are hiding behind quotes and examples.

As for unknown, I don't know from the head begins and the tail ends here. Your staccato argument (Yes, you are arguing since you're debating vehemently the reasoning behind your suspension) doesn't help with your cause either. Zero Tolerance Policy is an open definition and if so happens your sentence happens to be out of step with the staff suspending you, so be it. Why are you being anally retentive over a few days suspension? Does the your world stop rotating for those few days? This is not the first time you've argued with a staff over your suspension. Your /b/ post of obscenity for some so called "justice" was deemed against the rules and yet you defended it (vehemently again). It's the underlying principle of it. If you're perspective is different from others, fine by it. But if others differ from you, I don't suppose it's fair ramming your POV down their throats fair isn't it? And if you so have much hatred for one on the internuts most misdirected bloggers in Malaysia, bash it in his face since you do say that you're heads on type, right?