Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Guide for Purchasers (business not as usual)

views
     
TSaurora97
post May 27 2016, 12:11 PM, updated 10y ago

八方來財
*******
Senior Member
3,790 posts

Joined: Aug 2007



1. My background.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «



2. The Goal
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

3. Assumptions & Disclaimers

3.1 Assumption

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


3.2 Disclaimer

3.2.1 The opinion, views, answer and/ or example produced are based on my experience, common sense and encounter of the problems and issues. Some of the problems and issues may be real or hypothetical, in any case is used for reference and discussion purposes only to enable readers to better understand the issue and/ or the problem concerned.

3.2.2 Feel free to feedback and challenge every word I have written in this thread, this will improve the content significantly and allow me to provide source to reinforce my conclusion.


3.1 Know what questions to Ask

3.1.1 SOP questions
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


3.1.2 unique questions
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


4. Other tips

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by aurora97: May 30 2016, 01:40 PM
Ero-Sennin
post May 27 2016, 12:18 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
930 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Somewhere I Belong...



This topic should pin it up.
teanu
post May 27 2016, 01:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
50 posts

Joined: Dec 2013
Good read!
peri peri
post May 27 2016, 02:31 PM

10k nonsense talkative club
********
All Stars
11,943 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
From: Kuala Lumpur



im not sure wat did i read, but my brain hurt, really, no hard feeling. lm just saying.
eugenepoon
post May 27 2016, 02:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
96 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Serdang


very good read....
TSaurora97
post May 27 2016, 02:35 PM

八方來財
*******
Senior Member
3,790 posts

Joined: Aug 2007



QUOTE(peri peri @ May 27 2016, 02:31 PM)
im not sure wat did i read, but my brain hurt, really, no hard feeling. lm just saying.
*
Still editing, just highlight the points unclear and I will try and simplify it.
kochin
post May 27 2016, 02:39 PM

I just hope I do!
********
All Stars
10,319 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
From: Malaysia


bro, some of it, imho, is not entirely true nor can it be enforced ler...
TSaurora97
post May 27 2016, 02:42 PM

八方來財
*******
Senior Member
3,790 posts

Joined: Aug 2007



QUOTE(kochin @ May 27 2016, 02:39 PM)
bro, some of it, imho, is not entirely true nor can it be enforced ler...
*
specify which one not true or cannot enforce and let me explain.

I don't expect readers believe what I say without doing research and it is good for forum seniors to point out the flaws so that the information may become even more accurate and reliable.

come come all feedback welcome!

more power to the Purchaser!

This post has been edited by aurora97: May 27 2016, 02:47 PM
kochin
post May 27 2016, 02:57 PM

I just hope I do!
********
All Stars
10,319 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(aurora97 @ May 27 2016, 12:11 PM)
a- Anything provided by developer (example fixture, furnishing, toiletries, flooring  or electrical etc…)
Ask for brand name, model and serial number. After that confirm in writing with developer. If developer not willing to confirm, things are VERY likely to change.

Case in point:-
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


unlikely any developer would confirm branding. it is always on "or equivalent" basis but the terminology have its flaws.
so if developer is not able to produce the things in writing, what should one do? drop the purchase entirely?
and also these items are not spelt in the SPA. at most, it's vide a separate agreement or letter.



There are two types of developer to this scenario. The conventional type normally will deliver VP within 36 months from the date of SPA. Whereas, there are some will deliver VP within 48 months from the date of SPA.

In my own personal view, it would be preferable to select the following:-

(i) if fixture and fittings provided, go for 48 months (case in point Exsim, they use the additional time to fit out the development); or
(ii) if bare unit, go for 36 months (case in point UOB).

Those who promise to deliver fixture and fittings within 36 months, likely than not is a rush job and electrical goods purchased are general out dated or old model.

it's not to do with the bare unit or fittings provided but more on the project itself.
nowadays, where tall highrises (more than 40 storeys) are practically difficult to complete within 36 months hence the need to seek additional time. a project in sentul if i am not mistaken even launch with 60 months completion period. so long they manage to obtain waiver from the relevant authorities and are able to do so.
increasingly, the norm for strata title development nowadays starts from 36 months but more are getting 48 months.


b- maintenance and sinking fund

This use to be and SOP question but many people has been caught by surprise especially the amendment to SMA 2015.

Case in point:-
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


What should you do?

Step1:-
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Schedule H IS standard. you can't change it.
any modifications would essentially means you are not signing on a standard SPA.
Schedule 1 to 6 is meant to be changed according to the project particulars.


Step 2:-
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Step 3:-
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


c- Accessory Parcel

Under the old regime, until the Strata Title is issue… All this accessory parcel will not be reflected in your maintenance charges and therefore absorb by the management. This is technically unfair to those owners who own a large chunk of accessory parcels (example 3 car parks, 5 air conditioning ledge, 2 private lift lobbies as opposed to 1 car park, 1 air conditioning ledge).

So the SMA made it fair.

However, there are some instances this good intent is abused. Take private lift lobby for instance. The Developer will normally advertise their unit is say 1000 sqf, more privacy with private lift lobby etc… What the developer doesn’t tell you is that the private lift lobby is actually an accessory parcel to the main parcel. Meaning that it is actually 900 sqf you r getting with additional 100 sqf attached.

For private lift lobby, please be mindful that IT CANNOT BE FULLY SEALED, there is a BOMBA requirement that there is a 5% opening for ventilation. IF YOUR DEVELOPER TELLS YOU THAT YOU ARE GETTING A FULLY SEALED PRIVATE LIFT LOBBY, I SUGGEST YOU NOT TO BUY IT.

So what’s the big deal about accessory parcels? Maintenance charges are halved and the management retain some control over your accessory parcel.

d- So you think you have an SPA you are safe?

my understanding is the formulae is a guide and still subject to formulae applied by the developer and subject to authorities' approval. ie. ledge and cp may not be halved, etc.

WRONG.

Each and every services stipulated in Second Schedule and building description stated under Fourth Schedule must be cross-checked and confirmed in writing with developer.

Case in point:-
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


No name: under the Fourth Schedule, it was stated that a “Gas Piping” will be built. After some time, we started to enquire with developer. Apparently, developer had gotten an exemption from local municipal hence is not required to install an LPG system. Jokes of our lives. Next thing they probably have an exemption for toilets.

this is real bad. if that's the case, you guys should have demand for rebates as savings from providing this.

More shenanigans to come…

- non-stop marketing calls!!! how to avoid this. PDPA?
- SPA with only execution page!!! initial on each page?
-HONEY my CONDO has Shrunk!!!!!! there's a clause in SPA to address this provided it does not exceed the tolerance.
- WTF my furniture can't move into the house!!!!!!!!

*
cheers.

SAHM your forte. please advice.
TSaurora97
post May 27 2016, 03:22 PM

八方來財
*******
Senior Member
3,790 posts

Joined: Aug 2007



unlikely any developer would confirm branding. it is always on "or equivalent" basis but the terminology have its flaws.
so if developer is not able to produce the things in writing, what should one do? drop the purchase entirely?
and also these items are not spelt in the SPA. at most, it's vide a separate agreement or letter.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


it's not to do with the bare unit or fittings provided but more on the project itself.
nowadays, where tall highrises (more than 40 storeys) are practically difficult to complete within 36 months hence the need to seek additional time. a project in sentul if i am not mistaken even launch with 60 months completion period. so long they manage to obtain waiver from the relevant authorities and are able to do so.
increasingly, the norm for strata title development nowadays starts from 36 months but more are getting 48 months.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Schedule H IS standard. you can't change it.
any modifications would essentially means you are not signing on a standard SPA.
Schedule 1 to 6 is meant to be changed according to the project particulars.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


my understanding is the formulae is a guide and still subject to formulae applied by the developer and subject to authorities' approval. ie. ledge and cp may not be halved, etc.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


this is real bad. if that's the case, you guys should have demand for rebates as savings from providing this.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


PDPA?
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


initial on each page?
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


there's a clause in SPA to address this provided it does not exceed the tolerance.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by aurora97: May 27 2016, 03:24 PM
kochin
post May 27 2016, 03:38 PM

I just hope I do!
********
All Stars
10,319 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(aurora97 @ May 27 2016, 03:22 PM)
unlikely any developer would confirm branding. it is always on "or equivalent" basis but the terminology have its flaws.
so if developer is not able to produce the things in writing, what should one do? drop the purchase entirely?
and also these items are not spelt in the SPA. at most, it's vide a separate agreement or letter.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


it's not to do with the bare unit or fittings provided but more on the project itself.
nowadays, where tall highrises (more than 40 storeys) are practically difficult to complete within 36 months hence the need to seek additional time. a project in sentul if i am not mistaken even launch with 60 months completion period. so long they manage to obtain waiver from the relevant authorities and are able to do so.
increasingly, the norm for strata title development nowadays starts from 36 months but more are getting 48 months.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Schedule H IS standard. you can't change it.
any modifications would essentially means you are not signing on a standard SPA.
Schedule 1 to 6 is meant to be changed according to the project particulars.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


my understanding is the formulae is a guide and still subject to formulae applied by the developer and subject to authorities' approval. ie. ledge and cp may not be halved, etc.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


this is real bad. if that's the case, you guys should have demand for rebates as savings from providing this.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


PDPA?
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


initial on each page?
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


there's a clause in SPA to address this provided it does not exceed the tolerance.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
difference in area is 2%. anything smaller than that, you may claim.
refer clause 12 (3).

ceiling height or common corridor width, etc, should be benchmark against the building plans.
nothing in showroom is binding.
BEANCOUNTER
post May 27 2016, 03:58 PM

20k VIP Club
*********
All Stars
20,146 posts

Joined: May 2011
Too much information.

Buying properties only...not to get phd.
SAHM
post May 27 2016, 04:09 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
204 posts

Joined: May 2014
QUOTE(kochin @ May 27 2016, 02:57 PM)
cheers.

SAHM your forte. please advice.
*
Kochin gor, surprised to be tagged here.

Yea... Indeed an interesting subject. Would like to discuss, too. But, really long post, don't know where to start. Am worried that I will be writing another long post once I start.

Will geh poh once I get back to my laptop. Now surfing with my iPad . biggrin.gif


kubrick16
post May 27 2016, 05:09 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
164 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
Good reference.

Thanks for your time to prepare this. thumbup.gif
Fortezan
post May 27 2016, 05:26 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
474 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
Good sharing!

I also started reading up on accessory parcel when I bought a condo where everyone advertised it as 1200 sf, but the SPA says 950 sf with additional 250 sf as additional usable area, which I later found out is an extension done by the developer. Anyway, the bank valuer value it based on 1200sf, so I guess it should be fine.
TSaurora97
post May 27 2016, 05:27 PM

八方來財
*******
Senior Member
3,790 posts

Joined: Aug 2007



QUOTE(SAHM @ May 27 2016, 04:09 PM)
Kochin gor, surprised to be tagged here.

Yea... Indeed an interesting subject. Would like to discuss, too. But, really long post, don't know where to start. Am worried that I will be writing another long post once I start.

Will geh poh once I get back to my laptop. Now surfing with my iPad .  biggrin.gif
*
Don’t touch on Basic SOP questions. SOP questions are more common sense and we can add on to it later.

Go straight for 3.1.2 “Unique Questions”. This is where all the unicorns/worms are.



TSaurora97
post May 29 2016, 04:46 PM

八方來財
*******
Senior Member
3,790 posts

Joined: Aug 2007



Update:

Assumption and Disclaimer

1. expanded with big a$$ disclaimer.

Common questions

1. g- freehold or leasehold land/ residential or commercial title.

Unique questions

1. e- thinking of buying furniture in advance? LOL, seriously think again.

Other tips
1. c- no more BS, misleading and fake advertisements.

2. d- u want the unit pay booking fee first boss!

3. e- HONEY my CONDO has Shrunk!!!!!!
SAHM
post May 30 2016, 12:11 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
204 posts

Joined: May 2014
QUOTE(aurora97 @ May 27 2016, 12:11 PM)



3.1.2 unique questions

There’s no such thing “WHAT YOU SEE IS WHAT YOU GET IN SHOWROOM” and developer will turn around and say “FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY”.

a- Anything provided by developer (example fixture, furnishing, toiletries, flooring  or electrical etc…)
Ask for brand name, model and serial number. After that confirm in writing with developer. If developer not willing to confirm, things are VERY likely to change.

Case in point:-
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


There are two types of developer to this scenario. The conventional type normally will deliver VP within 36 months from the date of SPA. Whereas, there are some will deliver VP within 48 months from the date of SPA.

In my own personal view, it would be preferable to select the following:-

(i) if fixture and fittings provided, go for 48 months (case in point Exsim, they use the additional time to fit out the development); or
(ii) if bare unit, go for 36 months (case in point UOB).


Those who promise to deliver fixture and fittings within 36 months, likely than not is a rush job and electrical goods purchased are general out dated or old model.

b- maintenance and sinking fund

This use to be and SOP question but many people has been caught by surprise especially the amendment to SMA 2015.

Case in point:-
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


What should you do?

Step1:-
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Step 2:-
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Step 3:-
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


c- Accessory Parcel

Under the old regime, until the Strata Title is issue… All this accessory parcel will not be reflected in your maintenance charges and therefore absorb by the management. This is technically unfair to those owners who own a large chunk of accessory parcels (example 3 car parks, 5 air conditioning ledge, 2 private lift lobbies as opposed to 1 car park, 1 air conditioning ledge).

So the SMA made it fair.

However, there are some instances this good intent is abused. Take private lift lobby for instance. The Developer will normally advertise their unit is say 1000 sqf, more privacy with private lift lobby etc… What the developer doesn’t tell you is that the private lift lobby is actually an accessory parcel to the main parcel. Meaning that it is actually 900 sqf you r getting with additional 100 sqf attached.

Hi,

I am relatively new here. Your post is long and I must say that I agree with certain points written.

I could be wrong but here is what I think.

I am one of those that who doesn't believe in "What you see is what you get."


Specify the brand name, model number etc

Not that I know of that it is a requirement under HDA, don’t think it is in the amended HDA either. Tell me more if there is such requirement.

I think, developer will be reluctant to specify brand name or model number due to a lot of uncertainties especially when the construction project has yet to be awarded, but that doesn’t mean that they have intention to cheat.

Free gift such as electrical appliances, may probably get a letter of confirmation from the developer if they are willing to provide such confirmation. In cases where confirmation in writing is provided, the developer would have qualified it as “ … or a substitute by other material of equivalent value.” or " the developer reserve the right to...." kind of things.

Those days when property was selling like hot cake, we were lucky if developer print a letter to list down the “free package” items in a “COMPUTER GENERATED LETTER AND NO SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED” letter.

It really depends on buyer’s and seller’s bargaining power, no right or wrong. For me, I don’t put high expectation on this “free gift” unless written confirmation is provided.

Fiiting and fixtures vs 36 months, 42 months, 48 months completion period

As far as I know, there is little relationship between the “free package” items and the completion period of more than 36 months.

The reason why a developer is granted approval to amend the completion period from 36 months to 42, 48 months or more, is because it requires a longer time to complete the project, site conditions, a taller building, higher number of units etc are the possible reasons to justify the longer completion period. The free package, built-in cabinets etc, generally are not stated in the SPA, as such, is quite irrelevant to be a factor for decision making.


Schedule 5 – Form of Service Charge Statement

A lot of people have a misunderstanding of this Fifth Schedule.

It is not required to write down the service charge per square metre, to be exact, per share unit in the Fifth Schedule of the SPA. The SPA says when developer request for service charge “shall be supported by a charge statement as issued in the form annexed in Fifth Schedule .” ie, the amount need not to be decided or written in the SPA at the point of purchase, but when they request for payment.

6th Schedule

To be exact, there is no Schedule 6 in the standard Schedule H. What developers do is that, they are amending the format in such a way that all the variable information to be stated in one page for convenience sake. Normally this page consists of purchaser’s and property’s particulars. These are the very important information . But, won't be surprised if your SPA doesn’t have 6th Schedule, it is not wrong.

Accessory Parcel and service charge calculation

There is no doubt a common old practice that developer will just calculate service charge on psf basis.

However, it is a requirement in the SPA to charge base on per share unit basis, even before SMA.

Share unit when decided by developer’s consultant, is normally base on floor area, and thus the mis-perception, ie people thought it is psf basis. The fact is, even before SMA, there are developers charging service charge base on floor area (main parcel) + accessory parcel (even same weightage as the main parcel).

The difference is that, it is only until SMA come into picture, the weightage of accessory parcel has been standardized.

There are more, may be next time……

Again, I could be wrong. Cheers!

TSaurora97
post May 30 2016, 12:19 PM

八方來財
*******
Senior Member
3,790 posts

Joined: Aug 2007



QUOTE(SAHM @ May 30 2016, 12:11 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
I am relatively new here. Your post is long and I must say that I agree with certain points written.

I could be wrong but here is what I think.

I am one of those that who doesn't believe in "What you see is what you get."


Answer:-
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «



Specify the brand name, model number etc

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Answer
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «



Fiiting and fixtures vs 36 months, 42 months, 48 months completion period

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Answer:-
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «



Schedule 5 – Form of Service Charge Statement

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Answer
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «



6th Schedule

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Answer
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Accessory Parcel and service charge calculation

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Answer
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by aurora97: May 30 2016, 01:45 PM
malaysiathegreat
post Aug 9 2019, 05:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
292 posts

Joined: Jul 2014


Very informative Aurora and Sham. Thank you both.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0234sec    0.56    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 05:53 AM