Currently I'm playing WoW at 300-700ms ping on Illidan since 5 hours ago which is normal for me. Current IP is 218.111.xxx.xxx . What about others?
No more lag for WoW?
No more lag for WoW?
|
|
Jan 10 2007, 10:32 PM, updated 19y ago
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
Currently I'm playing WoW at 300-700ms ping on Illidan since 5 hours ago which is normal for me. Current IP is 218.111.xxx.xxx . What about others?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 11 2007, 03:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
Definitely different IP affects different servers I think. Illidan has no lag at all for 218.111.xxx.xxx
|
|
|
Jan 11 2007, 08:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
Back to unbearable lag for 218.111.xxx.xxx on Illidan.
Having 1000+ms sigh |
|
|
Jan 11 2007, 10:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
Use this script to get this 218.111 IP if you are using Streamyx.
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=265668&st=0 You can also modify it if you have knowledge about vbscript to use it on other ISP to test out some IPs. |
|
|
Jan 12 2007, 10:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
Currently 10000ms+ for 218.111.xxx.xxx on Illidan. Login is fast but not Illidan
Edit: 219.95.xxx.xxx = very slow login and having 3000ms+ 219.94.xxx.xxx = fast login and having 900-1100ms and lag spikes that gives u 3000+ms This post has been edited by TristanX: Jan 12 2007, 10:58 AM |
|
|
Jan 12 2007, 02:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
No IP is playable now on Illidan. Back to disconnectfest. sigh
Edit: Bittorrent seems to be affecting WoW. It's not even running at 50% of my bandwidth. WoW has no problem for me when I turn BitTorrent off. Looks to me that TMNet capped my bandwidth. This post has been edited by TristanX: Jan 12 2007, 04:16 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 12 2007, 04:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
You can use Notepad and edit that vbscript to use 219.94 . It's my alternative if I can't get 218.111 .
|
|
|
Jan 14 2007, 02:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
Currently lagging like hell for 218.111. I have nothing but WoW on. Running at 4000+ms.
This post has been edited by TristanX: Jan 14 2007, 02:22 PM |
|
|
Jan 14 2007, 02:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
No idea. This is expected for bad ISP like TMNet anyway. Can't do much about it but TMNet announced that it will be 80% capacity by 12th and 100% by 20th.
This post has been edited by TristanX: Jan 14 2007, 02:28 PM |
|
|
Jan 14 2007, 03:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
Switched to 219.94 and it has no lag. Bandwidth is still capped though.
|
|
|
Jan 14 2007, 08:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE([LinkZ) Go to this topic:http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=265668&st=0 Modify this script using Search and Replace on your Notepad. Just search 218.111 and replace it to 219.94. You can even change it to other IP if you have other ISP but only the IP that your ISP has. This post has been edited by TristanX: Jan 14 2007, 09:00 PM |
|
|
Jan 21 2007, 12:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
Seems like bandwidth is recovering today. Running 218.111 .
|
|
|
Jan 22 2007, 01:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
218.111 lagged at 4.30pm. I'm using 219.94 after that and it doesn't lag at all at 1am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 22 2007, 05:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
Getting mad lag on all IPs atm.
|
|
|
Jan 23 2007, 11:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
There is no other IP that is better for me. I still prefer 218.111 or 219.94 . These are the IPs that doesn't lag much no matter what time you play.
|
|
|
Jan 24 2007, 01:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
Ganking 1v1 is fine, ganking 1 with a party is a noob type of gank. There are plenty of bad players doing this cause they don't use brains at all. It's inconsiderate cause you know you will win and take advantage of it. They won't know when it happens the same way to them. Winning with number of players is nothing.
This post has been edited by TristanX: Jan 24 2007, 01:11 AM |
| Change to: | 0.0188sec
0.11
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 05:03 AM |