QUOTE(jack bauer @ Mar 25 2018, 10:44 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
I'm sure all the good drivers out there appreciated what have you done by reporting the bad drivers wrongdoing to the authorities.
The authorities have a set of rules and SOP that they need to adhere to in order to build a solid case. As long as your report included all the necessary information required, Notis Siasatan (Mahkamah) will be directly served to the accused driver. You will not be contacted for more further information. You will only received an acknowledgement email, stated the notice has been served to the driver. The rest..just trust them & the enforcement system.
if the OKT (orang kene tuduh) challenged the report, JPJ/Polis may need you to be presented before the magistrate, as a witness. This is part of the process and normally will be the last step. If OKT just mengaku bersalah during investigation period, the process stop there and OKT will have to pay the saman (up to RM2,000, not RM300). To challenge a report is not also easy on the OKT side, he/she needs to hire a lawyer, go through a lengthy process which the cost will be higher than RM2K. So, in most cases they will confessed guilty and pay the summon. As long as your report are completed with the required info, that's should be sufficient.
I have submitted many reports, all with completed info, plus clear photos with explanation. All the drivers/cars I reported has been served with Notis 114. So far, JPJ never called me to attend any court hearing but I have no problem to be the witness in the court.
Below is the only info required, make sure you included all the details:
BUTIR-BUTIR ADUAN:
1) No kenderaan yang melakukan kesalahan:
2) Tarikh kejadian:
3) Masa kejadian:
4) Tempat kejadian dan negeri kejadian:
5) Gambar kesalahan beserta nombor pendaftaran kenderaan yang jelas:
6) Jenis kesalahan:
BUTIR-BUTIR PENGADU:
1) Nama pengadu:
2) No i/c:
3) No tel:
4) Alamat:
the crux of the issue:
1. How many "great" driving habits does one encounter daily?
eg. using emergency lane, running lights, throwing out stuff from the car (WHILE moving)
2. Thus, based on (1.) + reporting WITH evidence & details, how much time would the "accuser" need to clear all these?
Keep in mind, if one has nothing to do but be the champion (chump?) of the people, then ok la. Normal working stiff with 2 to 3 jobs.. how lor. Yup, Maslan say must work 2-3 jobs to keep afloat ma
3. Again - evidence have been given, heck, video evidence is available if JPJ can accept.
So.. with clear evidence, still need accuser. Like i said, great SOP.
AES is fully automated right? Just evidence but can be executed without accuser?
Just wondering about the great minds that came up with such SOP yar - not stirring up the hornet's nest / slinging
anyhow, it doesn't matter - just like many things in a "greatly" executed / superb SOP "system", they are the experts and logic doesn't need to prevail.
<out of topic>
hm.. wondering if such is why our "crime index" is 'low" - cause certain items are NOT part of statistics..
not reported = no crime
AND not wanting to divulge data but every evidence provided = not reported
cool
This post has been edited by wongmunkeong: Mar 26 2018, 09:18 AM