QUOTE(derred @ Sep 13 2007, 06:07 PM)
U have to pay even to receive call, just like sms. This is the other side of the world so don't ask me why.
Off-topic, but making handphone users pay for incoming calls is good regulatory policy - it results in lower charges for everyone.
You can't have true competition unless customers are paying all the fees associated with calls to/from their own phones. Otherwise you end up with the case like Malaysia, where when I (a Digi customer) call you (a Maxis customer), you don't pay anything to Maxis for the call. Instead, I have to pay Maxis (Digi passes the charge on). There is no incentive for Maxis to reduce that charge because I am not a Maxis customer; there is no danger that I will leave them.
This is why the US, Canada, Singapore, Hong Kong, and China are using the system where the receiver pays for the call. In all of these countries, as a result of competition, handphone charges are very low on a PPP basis.
Australia is considering changing over too, a very good idea given how overpriced handphone usage is there.
Sep 14 2007, 01:47 AM
Quote
0.0386sec
0.31
7 queries
GZIP Disabled