Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Leaking in apartment

views
     
peri peri
post Jun 8 2016, 09:04 AM

10k nonsense talkative club
********
All Stars
11,940 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
From: Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(enriquelee @ Jun 7 2016, 04:56 PM)
This only work if the main contractor have assign the warranty to JMB. Or else need the developer to call the main/subcon.
*
warranties doesnt need to be re-assign. Its contents already covers the building itself, not issue or attention to who. Read the warranties outline if you yet come across any, dont get yourself confuse.
enriquelee
post Jun 8 2016, 02:13 PM

Don't ask for more, ask for COKE
********
All Stars
10,507 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Atlanta

QUOTE(peri peri @ Jun 8 2016, 09:04 AM)
warranties doesnt need to be re-assign. Its contents already covers the building itself, not issue or attention to who. Read the warranties outline if you yet come across any, dont get yourself confuse.
*
I understand the format well. What you mentioned is correct, the content cover the building itself. The warranty will spell out the main contractor and the sub contractor has entered into a waterproofing contract, and they shall provide a joint warranty to the developer.

The problem is, when the developer do not want to help up on this warranty issue. They will throw a question to their purchaser, Where does it mentioned in the SPA (or any other legal document enter between the purchaser and developer) that mentioned the property you bought is covered by 10 years waterproofing warranty. SPA only spell out the defect liability period which is usually 24 months only.

In order to avoid this situation, usually a good developer will request the main contractor to assign the said warranty to JMB or RA, so that they have a document to call for the warranty. Or else there is no document for the JMB/RA to call the warranty.
peri peri
post Jun 9 2016, 09:44 AM

10k nonsense talkative club
********
All Stars
11,940 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
From: Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(enriquelee @ Jun 8 2016, 02:13 PM)
I understand the format well. What you mentioned is correct, the content cover the building itself. The warranty will spell out the main contractor and the sub contractor has entered into a waterproofing contract, and they shall provide a joint warranty to the developer.

The problem is, when the developer do not want to help up on this warranty issue. They will throw a question to their purchaser, Where does it mentioned in the SPA (or any other legal document enter between the purchaser and developer) that mentioned the property you bought is covered by 10 years waterproofing warranty. SPA only spell out the defect liability period which is usually 24 months only.

In order to avoid this situation, usually a good developer will request the main contractor to assign the said warranty to JMB or RA, so that they have a document to call for the warranty. Or else there is no document for the JMB/RA to call the warranty.
*
No, you got it wrong. contract between developer and purchaser is on standard SPA part.

Warranty of building is another compliance by Architect under UBBL and PAM.

The time line for each type of warranty had been spelled out accordingly in regardless to 24 month DLP or 36 month DLP. There are anti termite (7 years), water proofing (10 years), external paint ( 5 years), steel roof truss (10 years), timber roof truss (5 years) and etc.

Local Council insist all these warranties to be compiled in Borang Gs before CCC approved so that Architect can issue Borang F aka VP

By all means, original copy of warranties always with Developer, a duplicate copy with Architect and another duplicate copy with local council.

u got the idea now?
enriquelee
post Jun 9 2016, 10:56 AM

Don't ask for more, ask for COKE
********
All Stars
10,507 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Atlanta

QUOTE(peri peri @ Jun 9 2016, 09:44 AM)
No, you got it wrong. contract between developer and purchaser is on standard SPA part.

Warranty of building is another compliance by Architect under UBBL and PAM.

The time line for each type of warranty had been spelled out accordingly in regardless to 24 month DLP or 36 month DLP. There are anti termite (7 years), water proofing (10 years), external paint ( 5 years), steel roof truss (10 years), timber roof truss (5 years) and etc.

Local Council insist all these warranties to be compiled in Borang Gs before CCC approved so that Architect can issue Borang F aka VP

By all means, original copy of warranties always with Developer, a duplicate copy with Architect and another duplicate copy with local council.

u got the idea now?
*
Yes, it is a condition precedent to CCC approval.
The point I try to bring up here is, as a purchaser, we rely on which right to demand the execution of repair work under a warranty which is not address to us.
If you can enlighten us on the mean of claiming this, it will be very helpful to many purchasers out there.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0122sec    0.26    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th March 2024 - 12:01 AM