QUOTE(enriquelee @ Jun 8 2016, 02:13 PM)
I understand the format well. What you mentioned is correct, the content cover the building itself. The warranty will spell out the main contractor and the sub contractor has entered into a waterproofing contract, and they shall provide a joint warranty to the developer.
The problem is, when the developer do not want to help up on this warranty issue. They will throw a question to their purchaser, Where does it mentioned in the SPA (or any other legal document enter between the purchaser and developer) that mentioned the property you bought is covered by 10 years waterproofing warranty. SPA only spell out the defect liability period which is usually 24 months only.
In order to avoid this situation, usually a good developer will request the main contractor to assign the said warranty to JMB or RA, so that they have a document to call for the warranty. Or else there is no document for the JMB/RA to call the warranty.
No, you got it wrong. contract between developer and purchaser is on standard SPA part.
Warranty of building is another compliance by Architect under UBBL and PAM.
The time line for each type of warranty had been spelled out accordingly in regardless to 24 month DLP or 36 month DLP. There are anti termite (7 years), water proofing (10 years), external paint ( 5 years), steel roof truss (10 years), timber roof truss (5 years) and etc.
Local Council insist all these warranties to be compiled in Borang Gs before CCC approved so that Architect can issue Borang F aka VP
By all means, original copy of warranties always with Developer, a duplicate copy with Architect and another duplicate copy with local council.
u got the idea now?