Jun 4 2016, 10:11 PM
QUOTE(sHawTY @ Apr 24 2016, 11:56 AM)
I've used both SATA + NVME SSD
The difference between both is negligible as not a lot of apps / games can utilize NVME
Windows 10 Cold Boot Time (Fast Boot Enabled)
Single HyperX SAVAGE 240GB : 9 seconds
Dual HyperX SAVAGE 240GB RAID 0 : 15 seconds
Samsung 950 PRO 512GB : 3 seconds (I kid you not)
But it all comes down to your pocket
If you can afford NVME, go for it
If you think an NVME SSD is too expensive, then go for SATA SSD
Owh, i believe a lot of people believe your words. The difference between both is negligible as not a lot of apps / games can utilize NVME
Windows 10 Cold Boot Time (Fast Boot Enabled)
Single HyperX SAVAGE 240GB : 9 seconds
Dual HyperX SAVAGE 240GB RAID 0 : 15 seconds
Samsung 950 PRO 512GB : 3 seconds (I kid you not)
But it all comes down to your pocket
If you can afford NVME, go for it
If you think an NVME SSD is too expensive, then go for SATA SSD
QUOTE(chanhin @ May 24 2016, 09:57 PM)
Now my new desktop is finally with acceptable boot up time...
New problem... I found both my phone and tablet boot up time is double of my deskstop...
Yeah. After using SSD in my own PC, kindly like wanna replace my workplace hard drive computer, but cannot do so. When i help people to fix their PC problem, also kinda like very frustrated with the booting speed. New problem... I found both my phone and tablet boot up time is double of my deskstop...
Down the line, i think the most important is that the regular maintenance schedules is the most important 1.
Quote
0.0193sec
0.44
7 queries
GZIP Disabled