it always feels good to have MEGA project without any brain to think if it can generate enough revenue..

JUST like ECRL
have you calculated how many passenger/goods it needs to generate enough profit to pay for the loan+interest????

and you think all the Malaysia lands are own by private ????

you need enough populations to justify for MRT / ECRL..
else you just wasting public funds which can be better used for others, i.e upgrade sabah / sarawak roads

Why go into Bukit Damansara? The reason why some places remain as 'atas' is because the difficulty on public access, hence the privacy and exclusivity. Other place like Tropicana Golf Club, Sieramas, Country Heights are good example of exclusivity. People in these place do not need public access, we have private transportation. Providing with public transports mean anyone can come anytime.

My bad for using the wrong pronoun that trigger you so badly. I should have use they instead because, YES I'm not belong to the rich. I'm  just a poor salary earner.

Anyway, things for you to think about. There are different categories of property market depending on the target group. I do not deny that good infrastructure leading to the increase of property value. But that only happen to property where the target market group is the working class, where 'convenience' is the priority. However, place like Bukit Damansara, Tropicana, Sieramas, and Country Height have different target market group. These places are more inclining to the ultra rich, e.g. CEOs, politicians, etc. For the mindset of this group, exclusivity and privacy are deem valuable as they do not want much public nuisance. Good infrastructure leading to high traffic volume which turn into lesser privacy. Take a very good example, the MRT line supposing to have a station near to Tropicana, but residents are making complaint and objection to the idea. And I believe the station has been canceled or revised to a better place.

And also YES. The real we has multiple properties for investment. But they always come down to a place, the only place that they will call it their forever home.

Think it deeper. I might be wrong because I'm not WE that earn that much of cash.

Is not me talking about Bukit Damansara in my argument? Also, have you really been to Bukit Tunku and Bukit Damansara? There are no public transit as far as I know.
So in your opinion Tropicana is ‘helang’ or not ‘helang’? Your first sentence says it is pretentious ‘helang’, then your last sentence are making it in the same categories as Bukit Damansara.

Anyway, go check out where does Marina Mahathir and Ismail Sabri is living. Tell me if Tropicana is pretentious.

Also, Bangsar is one good example of what happen to a place when you bring in public transit, congested and mixed up. Bangsar area has two prominent addresses, Bukit Bandaraya and Bukit Pantai, which are very likely get infested by these public transit soon. Hence most residents have left and their units are being converted to commercial use.

I’m not going to put you more information, as I can see from your argument that you are an ignorant kid. My sincere apology if my sentences do hurt your ego somewhere. All the best.

Bukit Kiara =/= Bukit Damansara

I was wonder why Bukit Damansara was in the discussion? Like the MRT3 didn't even directly pass through the place.