Before I start, disclaimer I'm working for Speedrent, but I always been the negative/abuse guy in the company, finding loophole to exploit most of the time

This will be my own fair share of opinion.
First, bad tenants are expected in some way or the other and we try our best to address this. This is bound to happen, so the 3 months guarantee is similar to you receiving your 2+1 deposit. We tackle this issue by volume, if we get let say 50 houses, and 2-3 bad cases, we still able to absorb(staying in green) while you as the landlord couldn't do so.
Second, it's a trade off, pay 10% extra or pay 2+1. I'm 24 and I'm able to pay for my deposit but some people prefer to have extra cash on hand to do business/for any emergency uses while paying an extra 10% fees for this flexibility. It depends on how you value your "stucked" cash. A 1.5k unit means you will have 4.5k stuck to your landlord and as a previous tenant myself, sometimes getting back the deposit from certain landlord isn't a pleasant experience.
Low entry cost is the key point here which means you might deal with more problems as per said. There is a credit card upfront, which means you will need to pass your credit score check upfront, so that saves us a hassle, as the bank already do the job for us.
Early proper warning is another key point to take note here. Some tenants can make up excuse like I'm overseas etc, but you can't lie when your credit card can't be swiped. But then, people like you and me, will say they can say it's issue with bank etc. Remember the 3 months guarantee? Speedrent will transfer you your monthly rent(1st day of the month) regardless if tenant already pay or not, so the stress is actually on Speedrent to get back the cash. Think about it, you don't care anyhow also, you still guaranteed 3 months on-time rent.
It's actually more stress on us to get this to work out and trust me, I been throwing a lot of loopholes/negative feedback for months before we finally come out with this. It's a risky business for us, not much on landlord/tenant side.
What's the worse abuse I can think of? To steal everything then cancel off their card(which already in red, so they need to clear before they can cancel it anyway). Then we turn 1 big round, come back to all the original problem you would face when you renting out your place normally with 2+1 deposit. If they don't cancel it, we still able to charge the card for extra damages they had done, so there is an extra way to get more from your tenant now, instead of just 2+1.
I see a few tenancy agreement questions so I try address it here. We have our own digital signing platform(http://startsign.speedrent.com/), its a normal tenancy agreement with extra clause on no deposit scheme. This is of course by the law, legit, all drafted by our lawyer.
As a point from business, you need to look at this, not as a conventional business way, it's more towards startup style, where we trial and error and pay for our losses as a fees for the experience and continue refining our service to meet the market demands. We probably looking at like 5-10% bad cases which led to the negative view on having bad tenants. Just to tackle this issue, the whole industry decide to implement such regulation, but indirectly it makes house harder to rent out, tenants not able to even rent place even tho they can get the cash flow to finance the monthly rental. We understand it's a huge change to how the industry works, which is why it probably going to be a rough ride and will take a lot of effort just to get this thing to work. It's a very sleepy industry isn't it, very old school way of doing stuff, so time to breathe some fresh air?
This post has been edited by sasaug: Apr 12 2016, 05:48 PM