QUOTE(JC_jun @ Mar 21 2017, 10:49 PM)
My guess will be speed boost like last time This post has been edited by topeng perak: Mar 22 2017, 10:13 AM
TIME [OFFICIAL] TIME Fibre Broadband™ v3.o, 500 Mbps of rocket science
|
|
Mar 22 2017, 10:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 23 2017, 12:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
Time surprise really not surprise at all
|
|
|
Mar 23 2017, 12:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 23 2017, 12:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 23 2017, 12:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 24 2017, 05:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 27 2017, 04:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 27 2017, 04:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
QUOTE(miyakochan89 @ Mar 27 2017, 04:35 PM) yo guys, I am thinking to change to Time from Unifi, please gimme honest feedback cause I do play MMORPG so a stable connectivity with constant speed is important for me! Thanks. I never play MMORPG. So far using TIME for torrenting, streaming (laptop,PC, android box), PS4 online gaming, direct download from seedbox, multiple phone connect at the same time fb, whatsapp, youtube etc. No problem whatsoever. I live in BU area btw, Bandar Utama, Petaling Jaya. I believe TIME can handle MMORPG and you won't regret it |
|
|
Apr 21 2017, 09:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
QUOTE(miyakochan89 @ Apr 21 2017, 08:37 AM) Anybody has problem with torrent speed? Can teach on how to optimize the setting or etc to reach the best speed? As well as the ping issues? My friend told me he is able to reach 30mbps at least from downloading and I'm only at 10mbps using the same torrent. What package u subscribe? 300Mbps?Any advise? Thanks. |
|
|
Apr 21 2017, 10:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2017, 11:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
|
|
|
Apr 25 2017, 01:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
QUOTE(miyakochan89 @ Apr 21 2017, 07:46 PM) Hey all, after doing some research and spoken with two networking people, this is what i have gathered so far. I still not understand the bold part. You only expect 30mbps out of 100mbps using torrent?The speed of downloading torrent files does not only rely on Internet speed. Given the situation where your internet speed is awesome, then the number of seeders will come into play and also the upload speed of the seeders. If you are connected with seeders with slow upload speed, then your download speed will be affected. So theoretically, even with 100mbps package, it's possible to reach up to 30mbps while downloading torrents. The best indication of downloading speed is through direct downloads. Also, speedtest.net is a bad indicator as it could be rigged, like ISP could pay speedtest a certain amount to maintain that numbers for their users.** So this is what they suggested me to use: http://speedtest.googlefiber.net/. **Disclaimer: I am not an expert on this, but this what I have gathered. As far as the speed concerned, I am pretty satisfied with it, just wanted more and make sure I am maximizing the usage. |
|
|
May 12 2017, 09:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
QUOTE(hotfloppy @ May 11 2017, 03:20 PM) I'm currently using a wifi adapter (TL-WN823N) which support up to 300Mbps. My built in wifi not really compatible with my current OS so I had to use the adapter. Thats your problem. You will never able to maximize speed with this adapterI found this one router, Tenda AC1200 iirc, but they just support fast ethernet only. What's the estimated budget for gigabit router ya? Does Dlink router offered by Time good? Btw, I saw lots of people suggested TP-Link Archer C9 but its quite expensive. |
|
|
|
|
|
May 12 2017, 03:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
|
|
|
Jun 2 2017, 09:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
|
|
|
Jun 13 2017, 10:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#56
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
QUOTE(FusionXY @ Jun 12 2017, 07:23 PM) Here the steps to set up IPv6. Noob question here. Any advantage using ipv6?Step 1: Login to your router via 192.168.0.1 Step 2: Login ID : admin Password : Blank Step 3: Go to Settings Step 4: Go to Internet Step 5: Click IPv6 Step 6: Set My Internet Connection Is --> PPPoE Step 7: Set share with IPv4 Step 8: If you have set the IPv4 using Google DNS then you can set IPv6 Google DNS. Step 9: The Auto Configuration Type --> Select DHCPv6 --> If cannot work --> Set Stateless Step 10: Click Save Step 11: Done |
|
|
Jun 13 2017, 08:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#57
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
QUOTE(FusionXY @ Jun 13 2017, 04:39 PM) 1.More Efficient Routing Thanks for the info. Seeing the disadvantage i will stick to ipv4 then IPv6 reduces the size of routing tables and makes routing more efficient and hierarchical. IPv6 allows ISPs to aggregate the prefixes of their customers' networks into a single prefix and announce this one prefix to the IPv6 Internet. In addition, in IPv6 networks, fragmentation is handled by the source device, rather than the router, using a protocol for discovery of the path's maximum transmission unit (MTU). 2.More Efficient Packet Processing IPv6's simplified packet header makes packet processing more efficient. Compared with IPv4, IPv6 contains no IP-level checksum, so the checksum does not need to be recalculated at every router hop. Getting rid of the IP-level checksum was possible because most link-layer technologies already contain checksum and error-control capabilities. In addition, most transport layers, which handle end-to-end connectivity, have a checksum that enables error detection. 3.Directed Data Flows IPv6 supports multicast rather than broadcast. Multicast allows bandwidth-intensive packet flows (like multimedia streams) to be sent to multiple destinations simultaneously, saving network bandwidth. Disinterested hosts no longer must process broadcast packets. In addition, the IPv6 header has a new field, named Flow Label, that can identify packets belonging to the same flow. 4.Simplified Network Configuration Address auto-configuration (address assignment) is built in to IPv6. A router will send the prefix of the local link in its router advertisements. A host can generate its own IP address by appending its link-layer (MAC) address, converted into Extended Universal Identifier (EUI) 64-bit format, to the 64 bits of the local link prefix. 5.Support For New Services By eliminating Network Address Translation (NAT), true end-to-end connectivity at the IP layer is restored, enabling new and valuable services. Peer-to-peer networks are easier to create and maintain, and services such as VoIP and Quality of Service (QoS) become more robust. 6.Security IPSec, which provides confidentiality, authentication and data integrity, is baked into in IPv6. Because of their potential to carry malware, IPv4 ICMP packets are often blocked by corporate firewalls, but ICMPv6, the implementation of the Internet Control Message Protocol for IPv6, may be permitted because IPSec can be applied to the ICMPv6 packets. One Disadvantage: Slow down the speed. |
|
|
Jul 12 2017, 03:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#58
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
QUOTE(raul88 @ Jul 12 2017, 10:07 AM) I wish I could say that budget is not an issue For budget just go for tenda ac1200 or ac1900.But it does Any dlink, tplink ot tenda router u guys can suggest? Asus is way2 too expensive for me BTW only for small appartmentn less than 900sqf Need wireless connection » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by topeng perak: Jul 12 2017, 03:39 PM |
|
|
Jul 17 2017, 10:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#59
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
|
|
|
Oct 19 2017, 03:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#60
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
487 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.2207sec
0.73
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 02:09 AM |