Just curious before jumping into dslr, what camera system you using currently?
Photography Nikon vs Canon DSLR lens mount, real world diff., real usage diff. in lens mount of N & C.
Photography Nikon vs Canon DSLR lens mount, real world diff., real usage diff. in lens mount of N & C.
|
|
Mar 27 2016, 11:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,255 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
Just curious before jumping into dslr, what camera system you using currently?
|
|
|
Mar 27 2016, 01:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,255 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(scoutfai @ Mar 27 2016, 01:00 PM) At the beginning, old school full manual Minolta film, from my dad age. but stop it very soon because too freaking expensive to stay on this system. I see. Though not sure why you would want a camera like D810 with whooping 36 megapixels camera for hobby, but if you have the money with intention to print sharp big pictures bigger than your house wall, why not. Just note that you need to pair it up with very sharp quality lens to get optimal 35 mps out of it, otherwise it be a waste. Also note that FF is not one size fits all cause FF has some disadvantage against smaller sensors and it's not just about the price.Then bought my own Canon prosumer digicam. That's what I can afford that time. But it already broken 5 yrs ago. During uni time got help faculty take photo using their entry level Nikon DSLR. Many years didn't touch this hobby due to work commitment. Now I am a bit free, so can resume back. But the world of camera gadget has change a lot since I last left. Gadget tech. advance much faster than anticipated. If you are the kind of guy who may end up collecting lots of lenses, Canon maybe the way to go. Though if you own vintage lenses like the Minolta, Sony is probably better cause they have shorter flange, correct me if I'm wrong. But if I'm new with no system commitment, between C and N, I would rather go Nikon for their superior sensor and less worry about lenses cause I'm not planning to catch em all. This post has been edited by DaddyO: Mar 27 2016, 01:50 PM |
|
|
Apr 1 2016, 06:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,255 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Apr 1 2016, 03:31 PM) Well, I do agree that the FX sensor produces huge files and storage can be a problem. But then nowadays memory cards and hardisk are relatively cheaper than it was a few years ago. And with huge files, you have the room to crop your pics in PP if you wish and still get away with excellent quality. If ts insist, he can also switch to 1.5x DX mode with 15.4 MP images or 25.1 MP images with 1.2x crop. FX has better noise and dynamic range while DX sensors are superior when it comes to macro and DoF. Its not a matter about storage. Its a matter about cost vs needs. Yes you can crop more on 36mps BUT do you have the money spare to buy high quality lens to produce equivalent 36 perceptual mp? Putting a kit lens or lens that resolve mps lower than 20mps is not doing 810 justice. Why not 750D? But like i said, if ts has the money go for it but be aware he probably wont used it to full potential.QUOTE(jchue73 @ Apr 1 2016, 03:31 PM) I think more clarification to your statement is required, if you collect OLD lenses, the Nikon is a better system to stick to. Because as far as new lenses are concerned, both Nikon and Canon have equivalents. This post has been edited by DaddyO: Apr 1 2016, 11:31 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0172sec
0.76
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 10:24 PM |