If a buyer decides to pay cash for an undercon property what should the buyer do
to ensure that the property will not face disclosure in the event the developer did not service
their bridging loan eventually?

I wanted a discussion on the issue I raised actually - not whether to buy a property undercon or completed - that is not the point
actually.

yes it was this article that prompt me to open up this discussion though somehow many assumptions were made in the meantime about the cons of buying cash..as we know there are buyers in the market that do pay cash for their
purchases so what can they do to protect themselves - that was my general question actually..

agree buying a reputable developer is important not only when you are paying it outright but for other good reasons as well..

would a good developer provide a letter to the cash paying buyer that the property will be delivered with no lien?
or is this already covered under the spa?

do you know when did this ruling that strata title to be delivered upon VP came into effect?

thanks ...personally I feel that the enforcement of regulations is rather lax in this country so
not sure really how this will pan out in the end