Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 canon 400D setting tips?, saturation, sharpness??

views
     
ac98
post Dec 30 2006, 09:53 PM

The Spirit of Photography
*******
Senior Member
3,758 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Selayang


I prefer lower saturation, maybe -1 becoz images from DSLRs tend to be a lil' strong in colour, but if you're suffering from soft images, it's not the camera's problem ... you need to get yourself a better lens brows.gif
ac98
post Dec 30 2006, 10:09 PM

The Spirit of Photography
*******
Senior Member
3,758 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Selayang


QUOTE(R a D ! c 4 L @ Dec 30 2006, 09:56 PM)
Shoot in RAW, then you'll have more control over your image. The downside is that you need to post process your pics 1st before you convert them into jpeg smile.gif
*

.. thus slowing you down and can affect your workflow if you're doing it for money and time is a factor. I always recommend shooting in JPEG format.
ac98
post Dec 30 2006, 10:26 PM

The Spirit of Photography
*******
Senior Member
3,758 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Selayang


QUOTE(R a D ! c 4 L @ Dec 30 2006, 10:13 PM)
yaya, slowing you down is a factor. Just a suggestion though biggrin.gif because i always shoot in RAW XD each has its own benefits and downsides la hhaha
*

Well at the least you know what RAW formats are and what benefits they have. I have asked photographers during events why are they shooting in RAW format and they answered me "I dunno, they say shooting RAW is better" doh.gif

The point is "... shooting RAW is better" is correct in a way, but I seriously pity their "I dunno..." mentality. 'Monkey see Monkey do' is very bad for the learning curve. Many newbies are shy to ask, hence they get more questions than answers at the end of the day, they should understand WHAT they are doing and WHAT contributes to an image result.
ac98
post Dec 30 2006, 10:59 PM

The Spirit of Photography
*******
Senior Member
3,758 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Selayang


QUOTE(R a D ! c 4 L @ Dec 30 2006, 10:36 PM)
haha, yeah... but sadly alot of people are shy to ask, dont know why la haha... but i think soon enough they'll(well, some of them) learn in time what kind of settings are better for what kind of situations haha... self experience or someone will tegur them XD
*

I self-helped more than a year mastering digital photography with a DSLR before I can take control of my images via camera settings and post processing. Arguably, film was much much easier to control : Basically I had only a roll of film in my camera, one fixed ISO and an entire world to snap. Shutter speed and aperture is all I need to know and to set to get that perfect shot. With DSLRs, I had to worry about the new ways they are getting the exposure readings and colour render ALL OVER again! And ... I took up a new term, something I never encountered during film time ...

Colour Balance doh.gif

This post has been edited by ac98: Dec 30 2006, 11:01 PM
ac98
post Dec 31 2006, 08:29 AM

The Spirit of Photography
*******
Senior Member
3,758 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Selayang


QUOTE(R a D ! c 4 L @ Dec 31 2006, 12:34 AM)
Even my photography class last time my lecturer still stick to film though he had an DSLR of himself. Yeah, sometimes im facing colour balance issues too... kinda hard to learn it, and histogram... doh.gif do you know how to read them? and white balances, though its simple but I have trouble with it too.. =/
*

Yeah, histogram are not difficult to read but they function as good a guide as your LCD, so stick to your LCD. White Balance ... well ... not many ppl can actually tell me what is wrong with their images impromptu during events, so how would they know HOW to go about correct what they dun even know was wrong? tongue.gif

It's so easy to turn an image from colour to black and white, over-saturate or under-saturate them, but how do you intend to balance out images damaged by sodium light? Flouracent light? Tungsten lighting? Bulb light? A candle or a spotlight? There are just too many questions out there about WB. Even before any photographer tells ppl "Oh, I like it yellow like this!" he must ALSO know how to explain his style to his viewers before one of them puts one hand up and says "But that is not yellow, it's orange/red/magenta!!" laugh.gif
ac98
post Dec 31 2006, 08:31 AM

The Spirit of Photography
*******
Senior Member
3,758 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Selayang


QUOTE(lanusb @ Dec 31 2006, 05:27 AM)
so colour saturation is like making the colour abit to strong??
*

Yes you're right but it's not 'making' the colour abit to strong ... the colour is already BEING too strong.
ac98
post Jan 24 2007, 03:05 PM

The Spirit of Photography
*******
Senior Member
3,758 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Selayang


QUOTE(freshyyf @ Jan 24 2007, 02:29 PM)
I was fortunate to work with one professional wedding photographer for a day. He said dial the sharpness to the max, which is +4 because DSLR soften the picture automatically. After that, I use Unsharp Mask in CS Photoshop to make if further clearer, though not too extreme. The effecy is amazingly clear!
*

Professionals won't tell you much about PP, they'll tell you to use FILM laugh.gif


 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0191sec    0.89    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 12:50 PM