One thing you can be sure. It's very competitive between those telco's.

A. Today, it might be telco A who has the best deal.
B. Tomorrow, it might be telco B.
C. After that, it could be telco C.

If you think you got a good deal now, it is likely to change in future.

It is true that existing customers often do not get offered the new attractive deals offered to new customers, and that tends to happen with most types of companies.

The question is whether it is worth your while to monitor these things, and take the time to work out whether it's better or worse in your case, and switch if not.

I have done it before, but realistically, in the longer term, there are not much difference between the telcos. Why? if they are consistently worse than the competitors, they will go out of business.

So, in the longer term, there's not much difference between them.

Actually, you are comparing telco to telco.

If there are NO OTHER TELCO's, we would not be having this discussion.

Because there is ANOTHER telco that is cheaper, they are trying to retain your business rather than lose to THE OTHER telco.

Now, trust me -- the other telco's are doing exactly the same thing. They are offering a cheaper price to attract you. Do you know they are also offering the same deal to all THEIR EXISTING CUSTOMERS? I suspect not.

At the end of the day, the customer decides.

Stupid comparison.

You don't like the deal you are getting, change telco. No one if forcing you to stay.

Telcos change their deals almost everyday. So, are you going to keep switching telcos everything there is a new attractive deal?

You want to waste your time doing that, that's up to you.

For me, I look at the longer term. But you probably have no idea what "longer term" means.

But realistic, it is really up to you to decide what is best for you, so you can stop this "rogol" rubbish.

I'm not defending them.

But ultimately, it is telco vs telco.

1. Spare a thought for the people working there and have to "deny it". It could be you, me, or anyone else, and the management have told them to just "do it". That's not an excuse, but it is reality.
2. I know, it seems unfair. Companies exists to make money, so there are very few companies that focus on earning less. That's reality again.
3. If there are no other cheaper telco's, we would not have this issue. You would have to stay with your existing telco, and pay through your nose.

Did I say that's reality. Well, it is.

What I'm saying is, other telcos are doing the same thing. But ultimately, the customer decides.

In Kuching no TM line?

Or you mean out of Kuching?

Look, dumbass.

I'm not here to prove anything to you. I don't give a a fxxx about what prove you have.

So you can stop making a dumbass of yourself.

Errr, no I cannot do that, give you the plans to compare.

Even if I can, like say, I work for Maxis marketing, I would be shot down in flames, and LYN would drown in spam.

What I was saying was, over the long term, there would not be much difference.

But YOU, as the customer decides.

Some dumbass asked me for prove. For that dumbass, here's my finger.