Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

PC Audio Edifier Fan Club V3, where great sound comes to life =)

views
     
PetroToxin
post Dec 15 2007, 01:08 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,179 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: SS2, Petaling Jaya, Selangor


I still cant decide between M2300 and ATP3... Just want to hear what the Edifier fans have it mind..

Which is the best choice for Classical Music? Or should I just slightly increase my budget and get the M3300 instead?



PetroToxin
post Dec 15 2007, 06:55 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,179 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: SS2, Petaling Jaya, Selangor


Thanks for all the advice smile.gif

I think I will go to the shop and test for myself based on all your recommendation tongue.gif
PetroToxin
post Jan 1 2008, 01:55 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,179 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: SS2, Petaling Jaya, Selangor


I have a M1310.

The bass blasting directly at my face from the subwoofer that is on my desk is really rclxub.gif


laugh.gif
PetroToxin
post Jan 27 2008, 02:53 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,179 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: SS2, Petaling Jaya, Selangor


I just tested e1310 , M3300 and New ATP3 yesterday.
My comments: e1310 > M3300 > New ATP3



PetroToxin
post Jan 27 2008, 08:05 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,179 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: SS2, Petaling Jaya, Selangor


QUOTE(nismo91 @ Jan 27 2008, 03:00 PM)
u sure M1310 better than M3300?? (as by sign >)
*
not M1310 its e1310.
PetroToxin
post Feb 29 2008, 09:42 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,179 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: SS2, Petaling Jaya, Selangor


Between e3100 and M3300 which you guys think is better for Classical Music?
I require better clarity, better distinction between instruments and an OK bass.

Or do you guys have other recommendations?
PetroToxin
post Feb 29 2008, 11:05 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,179 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: SS2, Petaling Jaya, Selangor


QUOTE(fesick @ Feb 29 2008, 10:29 PM)
eh PetroToxin,u r the one who want buy my m3300 last time kan..
u need to try this speaker..not bad oh
*
Yes it was me. tongue.gif

QUOTE(xk2 @ Feb 29 2008, 10:23 PM)
vote for m3300,try it man biggrin.gif
*
I am asking because I auditioned the e3100 and m3300 at a shop before, can't really tell the difference as the environment was not quiet enough.




PetroToxin
post Mar 3 2008, 09:50 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,179 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: SS2, Petaling Jaya, Selangor


Since most of you all recommend the M3300, I think I will try to audition it better in shops...


Maybe I can grab them in the next PC fair. laugh.gif
PetroToxin
post Mar 6 2008, 10:19 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,179 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: SS2, Petaling Jaya, Selangor


QUOTE(cyew86 @ Mar 3 2008, 11:42 PM)
better buy from shops as PC Fair sometimes the price in PC Fair might not be any cheaper (or even more expensive than lowyat price)
not to mention u won't get to audition properly oso due to the noise there
*
I am aware of that...

Just that I want to give in some time for the newer models to come out tongue.gif
PetroToxin
post Mar 8 2008, 12:12 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,179 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: SS2, Petaling Jaya, Selangor


What is the strong point of the C3?

I was considering M3300 for quite some time but if I pay slightly more for the C3, is it worth it?
PetroToxin
post Mar 8 2008, 02:35 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,179 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: SS2, Petaling Jaya, Selangor


QUOTE(DotA 5.84C -AR @ Mar 8 2008, 12:25 PM)
i am the owner of this 2 model. well i can tell u, C3's satelite and subwoofer both also better than M3300, over all one step upper than M3300. what u pay what u get  wink.gif

the most important is u go and test yourself 1st b4 buy
*
Ah I see..

In terms of Clarity and sound stage which M3300 is quite known for, how is the C3?
Besides that, what about S2.1M which is also the same price as C3?

Classical Music listener here.

This post has been edited by PetroToxin: Mar 8 2008, 03:47 PM
PetroToxin
post Mar 9 2008, 02:39 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,179 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: SS2, Petaling Jaya, Selangor


QUOTE(DotA 5.84C -AR @ Mar 8 2008, 04:08 PM)
i am classical music listener too.  cool.gif clarity and sound stage of C3 definitely above M3300. S2.1M... i can only base on the listening experience at lowyat edifier showroom to make comparison with C3. i picked C3 because i like the seperation component design, more punch frm the subwoofer and crispy sound frm the satelite; over all it sounds more pleasant to me when i comparing it with S2.1M side by side in the showroom. but a lot of senior audiophile here claims that S2.1M hav better sound stage and clarity than C3, so i suggest u really hav to go try yourself bcoz may be my taste is different  biggrin.gif
*
If you ask me, the C3 definately looks much better than the S2.1M from the out look.
But I am not sure about each of their performance...

But technically, what is the advantage of having a separated Amp from the subwoofer? Besides saving space.
PetroToxin
post Mar 11 2008, 02:04 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,179 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: SS2, Petaling Jaya, Selangor


QUOTE(mattyl @ Mar 11 2008, 12:38 AM)
any1 noe where have Garage Sales?? izzit inside lowyat??
*
Head over to the Trade Zone
PetroToxin
post Mar 12 2008, 11:54 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,179 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: SS2, Petaling Jaya, Selangor


QUOTE(CV6149 @ Mar 12 2008, 09:41 AM)
so bro..how is your finding???

im using e3100..waiting for some caps to arrive..then ill mod it...then im gonna add the 8dip socket and change the opamp..
stock is using ne5532 which is a quite ok opamp but cheap laaa hehehe rm1.50 only in JP.

gonna try to improve this baby..then after that only think to change speaker...
*
Heh not too sure.

Now caught between M3300, S2.1M and C3

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0345sec    0.53    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 11:53 AM