Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
121 Pages « < 27 28 29 30 31 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V20

views
     
TechSuper
post Mar 22 2016, 10:28 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Jun 2015


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Mar 22 2016, 09:44 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

You're talking to me like I'm 5 years old. laugh.gif

I was saying it is unique because the Russians were the only ones to figure out they need some modification to the gun to enable them to use the one cooling material they had a lot of: snow.
*
it's not only the Russ way laa. everyone else who had snow oso use wat
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 22 2016, 10:36 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(TechSuper @ Mar 22 2016, 10:28 AM)
it's not only the Russ way laa. everyone else who had snow oso use wat
*
I can't recall any other nation having that special snow-cooling modifications to their Maxim guns as Russia has though. Unless you know one? If you can provide proof I'll gladly give you a pat on the back. laugh.gif
SUSSouzaDE
post Mar 22 2016, 10:46 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
193 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(yinchet @ Mar 18 2016, 05:30 PM)
Trump wont be happy about these.
He will demand us to pay for the protection instead.
*
Every country which US provide "protection" to is paying already. There's no free lunch.
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 22 2016, 10:53 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(SouzaDE @ Mar 22 2016, 10:46 AM)
Every country which US provide "protection" to is paying already. There's no free lunch.
*
Trump only thinks about the generalities.

Japan and South Korea already pay 50% of the costs of housing US troops in their respective countries. Japan and South Korea pay the US $ 2 Billion USD and $ 800 Million USD respectively on an annual basis to house these troops.
azriel
post Mar 22 2016, 02:35 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
QUOTE
O&G Ships for Patrols?

Marhalim Abas March 22, 2016 Malaysia- MMEA

SHAH ALAM: IT appears that APMM is moving towards using idle Oil and Gas (O&G) industry ships to augment its patrol fleet. Not much details on the proposed move yet apart from a tweet by APMM chief Datuk Ahmad Puzi Abd Kahar this morning.

I am trying to get more details but its likely that the APMM will lease Malaysian-flagged O&G ships laid idle by the low oil prices. How many and when it will start is the unknown at the moment. It must be noted that due to the Petroleum Development Act 194, ships involved in the local O&G industry must be Malaysian-flagged.

The proposed programme is under the National Blue Ocean Strategy (NBOS) just like how the RMN uses Bunga Mas Lima and Tun Azizan ships.

For a better perspective on using non-naval ships for patrol duties, read the excellent post by Think Defence on the issue. Go Here

One of own regular reader – … – has also proposed using O&G ships by the APMM for patrols to overcome the country’s financial constraints. It appears that APMM is also thinking the same thing.

Like its sister services, APMM is hampered by the uncertainty in funding – both in operational and procurement programmes. By leasing idle O&G ships it may be able to conduct more patrols in Malaysian waters especially it is saddled with one of the oldest patrol fleet in the region.

APMM is expected to operate six new patrol boats by 2018 with another two OPVs expected to come on line by 2020 – if the funding is not disrupted due to the current economic headwinds.


http://www.malaysiandefence.com/og-ships-patrols/
azriel
post Mar 22 2016, 04:07 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
New Patrol Boat for the Indonesian Navy - Kapal Angkatan Laut (KAL) Mapor built by PT Palindo Marine Batam.

user posted image

user posted image

http://assets2.jpnn.com/picture/normal/201...i.Koarmabar.jpg


azriel
post Mar 22 2016, 04:22 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
Launching of the new Indonesian Maritime Fishery Patrol Boat - ORCA 003 built by PT Daya Radar Utama.

user posted image

http://djpsdkp.kkp.go.id/photo/c/192/Pelun...6/?category_id=


SUSKLboy92
post Mar 22 2016, 04:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(azriel @ Mar 22 2016, 02:35 PM)
This is an excellent idea, the Bunga Mas Lima conversion also seemed to be taken notice of by other defence blogs.
DDG_Ross
post Mar 22 2016, 04:33 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: Feb 2014
From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean


QUOTE(azriel @ Mar 22 2016, 04:22 PM)
Launching of the new Indonesian Maritime Fishery Patrol Boat - ORCA 003 built by PT Daya Radar Utama.
*
so this ship under which dept? fishery? coast guard? custom?
azriel
post Mar 22 2016, 05:50 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
QUOTE(DDG_Ross @ Mar 22 2016, 04:33 PM)
so this ship under which dept? fishery? coast guard? custom?
*
Fishery. One of their boat recently was involved in an incident with a PRC Coast Guard in Natuna Island.

Anyway here is a video of the sister ship ORCA 001.



This post has been edited by azriel: Mar 22 2016, 05:54 PM
BorneoAlliance
post Mar 22 2016, 06:05 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

The Five Most Expensive Military Operations Since WWII

user posted image

QUOTE
On Thursday, Putin surprised Western experts, who had earlier estimated that Russia's air operation was costing the Kremlin $4-$8 million per day, by revealing that the campaign, which stretched from late September 2015 to March 2016, actually cost Russia about $464 million (under $3 million per day).


QUOTE
5: The NATO Bombing Campaign in Yugoslavia: $43 Billion

"The war in Kosovo," RIA Novosti recalls, "ended with the 78-day NATO operation, code-named Operation Allied Force, which saw attacks by Allied aircraft against military targets and civilian infrastructure in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY). According to estimates by journalists from the BBC and military experts from the British military publishing company Janes, the bombing campaign cost NATO about $43 billion."
QUOTE
#4: Gulf War: Operation Desert Storm: $102 Billion

"The Gulf War of 1990-1991," RIA Novosti notes, "can be considered one of the most transient military conflicts in US history. The Combat operation by a multinational coalition of forces led by the United States under the codename Desert Storm lasted 42 days, and ended with the liberation of Kuwait and the withdrawal of Iraqi forces."
QUOTE
#3: Korean War: $341 Billion

"On June 25, 1950, North Korean troops crossed the 38th parallel and launched an attack on South Korea; the same day, the UN Security Council promptly decided the 'Korean question', taking advantage of a boycott by the Soviet delegation" (in connection with the organization's refusal to accept Communist China as a permanent member of the Security Council), "adopting a resolution proposed by the United States in favor of military assistance to South Korea."
QUOTE
Vietnam War: $738 Billion

"In 1965, North Vietnamese guerrillas attacked a US military base at Pleiku, central Vietnam, and the United States launched Operation Rolling Thunder, which would become the longest US Air Force bombing campaign since the Second World War. Air strikes on North Vietnam cost Washington about $900 million," while on the whole "the Vietnam War, which lasted eight years, would cost the US $738 billion [in 2011 dollars] and more than 58,000 US military personnel."
QUOTE
The US 'War on Terror' (Iraq, Afghanistan): Between $1-6 Trillion

"After the September 11, 2001 terror attacks, US President George W. Bush launched Operation Enduring Freedom," a series of campaigns ostensibly aimed at combating global terrorism in countries around the world, from Afghanistan and Iraq, to the Philippines, Somalia, Pakistan, Yemen, and Indonesia.


http://sputniknews.com/military/20160321/1...-campaigns.html
BorneoAlliance
post Mar 22 2016, 06:11 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

ISIS, Malaysia, and the Risks of Lost Moral Authority

user posted image

QUOTE
For one, the plot to kidnap Najib and his ministers is real. Thirteen men were arrested in connection with the plot, two of them air force soldiers. The arrest of military personnel should set off alarm bells as such people are trained, ready-made combatants for ISIS. Moreover, they have access to weapons. Add to that, four terror plans were foiled by police last year.

To date, a total of 160 ISIS suspects have been arrested since 2014, according to Malaysian police, while 46 have gone to Syria to join ISIS. Another 18 have been killed fighting for ISIS in Syria and Iraq; six of them died as suicide bombers.

One of the suicide bombers, 26-year-old Mohd Amirul Ahmad Rahim, blew himself up in ISIS’ capital Raqqa in northern Syria on December 26, 2015.

Before he died, Amirul wrote a will decreeing that his pregnant Malaysian wife and their two-year-old son remain in Syria to continue the “jihad,” according to his father-in-law in an earlier interview with The Diplomat.

Amirul’s 25-year-old wife gave a chilling testimony, that many Malaysians eagerly signed up to become suicide bombers.

“People queue up to register as a suicide bomber… and many Malaysians have registered themselves to become a suicide bomber, according to my daughter,” said Amirul’s father-in-law.

The willingness of Malaysians to become suicide bombers reflect ISIS success in recruiting and radicalizing people from the country.

The counterterrorism unit of Malaysian police intelligence arm, the co-called Special Branch, has done a tremendous job in preempting attacks, identifying and arresting ISIS returnees from Syria as well as blocking many from going to Syria in the first place.

Prior to the emergence of ISIS, Special Branch was instrumental in keeping Malaysia safe from terror attacks following 9/11, even as its close neighbor Indonesia suffered devastating attacks, including the 2002 Bali bombings which killed 202, the 2003 Marriott Hotel bombing, 2004 Australian Embassy bombing and others.

Jemaah Islamiyah, Al-Qaeda’s Southeast Asia branch, was blamed for all the attacks.

Malaysians tend to forget that the mastermind for all the attacks in Indonesia were Malaysian fugitives Dr. Azahari Husin, an expert bomb-maker, and Noordin Moch Top, a charismatic recruiter and strategist. Both men have since been killed by Indonesian police.

To date, Malaysia has not suffered a single major terrorist attack, a situation which many in the country take for granted. ISIS is an issue that makes big headlines, but has little impact in people’s minds.

Ayub Khan Mydin Pitchay, Special Branch’s counter-terrorism chief, who works tirelessly together with his team to track down ISIS suspects, constantly warn against the threat of lone wolf attacks.


http://thediplomat.com/2016/03/isis-malays...oral-authority/
BorneoAlliance
post Mar 22 2016, 06:17 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

Death Of Marine Artilleryman In Iraq Reveals Previously Secret Fire Base Near Mosul

user posted image

QUOTE
On Saturday morning Marine Staff Sgt. Louis Cardin, a 27-year old artilleryman, was killed by a ISIS rocket attack on a previously secret forward fire support base in northern Iraq
QUOTE
What is known is that American advisers and about 5,000 Iraqi soldiers and their equipment are massing in the farming village of Makhmour, about 60 miles south of Mosul
QUOTE
The base is described as in an austere location with a “couple hundred” Marines living in tents, according to CNN’s sources. The site is said to be an artillery fire base setup to support allied forces heading toward Mosul and to protect Makhmour and the base, known as the Nineveh Operations Center, from ISIS attack.
QUOTE
Makhmour is not known to be a highly secure location in the first place. ISIS fired artillery shells filled at least partially with mustard gas last year at the city when Kurdish forces were present
QUOTE
ISIS scouts spotted the Marines doing just that before organizing the rocket attack. The enemy rockets are thought to have been launched from about nine miles away
QUOTE
The Marines quickly executed a counter-battery artillery attack, although it remains unclear if it was successful at killing the assailants


http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/death-of-...usly-1766108556
BorneoAlliance
post Mar 22 2016, 06:25 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

CHINA HAS A NEW ARMED DRONE HELICOPTER

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

QUOTE
An anti-tank missile fires by an Iraqi CH-4 drone destroys an ISIS artillery piece, seen in footage captured by the drone's onboard, retractable sensor turret.

China's armed CH-3 and CH-4 drones have recently made international news, being used by nations that range from Iraq to Nigeria. And now NORINCO, one of China's leading defense contractors, is getting in on the international drone export game, showing off a new armed drone helicopter.
QUOTE
The Sky Saker H300, seen here in Dubai, is China's first helicopter UCAV. Being cheaper and easier to use then larger UCAVs like the Reaper and CH-4, it could become a battalion and company level UCAV for on demand air strikes.
QUOTE
Unveiled at the International Exhibition of National Security and Resilience in Dubai, NORINCO's Sky Saker is a coaxial rotor, 100-200kg helicopter UCAV. The Sky Saker H300's cameras include electro-optical and infrared systems, along with laser target designators. In addition to surveillance and fire control, the Sky Saker H300 can provide midcourse corrections for guided munitions launched by other platforms, such as cruise missiles from H-6K bombers or shells fired from PLZ-05 howitzers. The Sky Saker H300's ground control station is likely to be networked to a wider array of Chinese military systems for integrated fire effect, which would make it not only a valuable asset for counterinsurgency and urban combat, but also for wider missions like hunting enemy small ships (such as the Taiwanese Tuo stealth boat) or electronic warfare vehicles.


user posted image

QUOTE
NORINCO offers this 16 kg, 6km range TL-2 guided missile for use on small UAVs, such as the Sky Saker 300. Small attack missiles, like the TL-2 and Northrup Grumman Viper Strike, will arm small tactical level UAVs to provide company and battalion units with their own organic air attack assets.

The Sky Saker has two missile launch tubes mounted on the fuselage sides; given that those missiles are "fire and forget", they are likely a version of the HJ-10 anti-tank missiles, which already arms the Z-10 attack helicopters, or even smaller 16kg TL-2 missiles.


http://www.popsci.com/chinas-new-armed-drone-helicopter
BorneoAlliance
post Mar 22 2016, 06:28 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

The C-17: When You Absolutely, Positively Have to Deliver 2 AH-64 Apaches, Accept No Substitutes



QUOTE
The C-17 is to the go-anwhere, do-anything workhouse of the U.S. military. Here is it not only landing on a dirt runway, but carrying two AH-64 Apaches, which get unloaded and ready for action in faster than most of us can get ready for work.


http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/w...pache-delivery/
BorneoAlliance
post Mar 22 2016, 06:41 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

All aboard the FLYING BOTTOM: Part plane, part helicopter, part hovercraft, it's a work of British genius - ROBERT HARDMAN climbs inside the vast airship that could revolutionise how we fly...

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

QUOTE
It all started when its British designers were commissioned by the U.S. Defence department to come up with a new breed of unmanned surveillance aircraft. But a trial run coincided with a budget crisis which paralysed U.S. public spending in 2013. With almost no notice, the Americans pulled the plug on the project just as it had got off the ground, despite having spent the best part of £70 million.
QUOTE
was very disappointing. But that’s when we got the deal of the century,’ says technical director Mike Durham. The British designers bought back their design from the U.S. military for a mere £200,000 and shipped the whole thing to Bedford.
QUOTE
There, they have spent the past three years redesigning it as a manned aircraft with a variety of uses — both domestic and military. And yesterday was the first unveiling of the finished product.
QUOTE
Even if this thing came under enemy fire, it would be remarkably stable as the air is kept at just 0.15 pounds per square inch (compared to 30psi in the average car tyre).
QUOTE
And what makes the Airlander unique is that it is designed with the characteristics of all sorts of aircraft. So, while it has many of the advantages of a lighter-than-air design, it will be slightly heavier than air when in flying mode.

Its four engines and its wings give it lift, just as they would on a regular fixed-wing plane, but it also means it can land on any surface without needing teams of ground crew to tether it to the ground and stop it blowing away.

The engines and wings also give it lift when it’s time to take off — again, just like a regular plane. And a hovercraft-style air cushion will enable take-off from any terrain.

But once airborne, it can also behave just like a helicopter, hovering over the same spot and even travelling backwards. At the same time, it can carry a similar payload to that great workhorse of the skies — the Chinook.

Unlike any helicopter, though, it can stay in one place for five days at a time – and for a fraction of the price.

Little wonder several governments, including our own, are already in discussion with the company.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-35...ionise-fly.html
BorneoAlliance
post Mar 22 2016, 07:00 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

RUSSIA DEFENSE REPORT: FIGHTING THE NEXT WAR



While Russia’s campaign in Syria which was waged mainly through airpower and military advisers who left the actual land combat to the Syrian forces and their allies, the next such campaign, which might occur either in the Middle East, some place closer to Russian borders, or even on Russian territory itself, could very well require a sizable ground operation. While the Russian Ground Forces were not directly tested in Syria even though its command and advisory personnel proved to be far more capable than the indigenous military talent left over from Saddam Hussein’s military and advisers proved by Turkey and Gulf Arab states. In the event that the Russian Ground Forces find themselves having to fight a land war, they will be as well prepared as their aerial counterpart.

While the Ground Forces languished for most of the first decade of the century, when there were no major military threats to Russia in evidence, the gradual deterioration of relations which followed the 2008 financial crisis, the subsequent systemic economic crisis, and the crisis-induced need to conquer new markets to avert economic collapse in the West, meant that the neglect had to be quickly reversed. The reversal, which is still under way, includes not only a far more active training agenda, with numerous readiness alert drills and large-scale multi-service strategic exercises which are once again eclipsing NATO’s ability to stage large operations, is also complemented by the development of state-of-the-art training methods. The 333rd Combat Training Center (CTC) in Mulino exemplifies the Ground Forces’ emphasis on combat readiness.

Even though Russian equipment tends to be durable and easily serviced, high-intensity training does put considerable wear and tear on it, and requires a considerable expenditure of fuel. Moreover, such training also tends to damage equipment when used by inexperienced operators. To maximize the training regimen’s effectiveness, the Russian military is turning to simulator training not only for individual training, but also for large unit training.

The 333rd CTC allows a complete motorized rifle brigade of several thousand troops to undergo a seven-week training program, which starts with individual soldier assessment, followed by company and battalion exercises, and finishing with a brigade exercise. The center allows the soldiers and units begin with simulator exercises to acquire the basic individual and unit skills, to be followed with full-scale field exercises with the use of laser simulators and live fire by all types of weapons available to a motorized rifle brigade. The 333rd CTC also includes a “battle town” that can be used to practice urban warfare skills by a single battalion task force at a time.

The center began its operations in September 2015, with the first unit to undergo training being a Naval Infantry brigade. It is probably not a coincidence that the first Russian troops to be deployed to Syria were Naval Infantrymen who underwent advanced combat training at the 333rd. The Ground Forces plan to send 3 complete brigades through the center every year, though in theory the center could accommodate 6 complete 7-week training cycles a year, and there is also an intense and accelerated version of the training program available which is likely to be used when a combat operation is imminent.

On a final note, the 333rd Center’s contractors included the German firm Rheinmetall which withdrew from the project following the EU’s imposition of sanctions on Russia in 2014. However, in a display of import substitution, the Russian defense industry proved capable of meeting the challenge and completing the center using domestic technologies. The planned expansion of the Ground Forces which will include the reactivation of 4 motorized rifle and tank divisions, means that the demands on the training facilities will only increase. The 333rd CTC exists mainly to serve the needs of the Western Military District. In the future, each of the remaining 3 military districts are expected to receive a similar training facility.

https://southfront.org/russia-defense-repor...g-the-next-war/
Cabin88
post Mar 22 2016, 07:12 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Sep 2011
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Mar 22 2016, 06:41 PM)
All aboard the FLYING BOTTOM: Part plane, part helicopter, part hovercraft, it's a work of British genius - ROBERT HARDMAN climbs inside the vast airship that could revolutionise how we fly...

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-35...ionise-fly.html
*
wat ? a modern high tech blimp laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
ayanami_tard
post Mar 22 2016, 10:28 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(Gregyong @ Mar 22 2016, 11:04 AM)
got sos for the maxim gun pic?
Wiki page says no citation for MAXIM use in Donbass war, I wanna add that citation  rclxms.gif
*
Is of ukranian comrade. cannot into reading cyrillic

Meanwhile, older BMP-1s and Panzer III under modernization for ukraine army, while the thais got brand new BTR-3E and T-84, from ukraine. sure older equipment is just as effective in counterinsurgwncy warfare, but this is just ridiculous

user posted image
SUSGregyong
post Mar 22 2016, 11:18 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,167 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Mar 22 2016, 10:28 PM)
Is of ukranian comrade. cannot into reading cyrillic

Meanwhile, older BMP-1s and Panzer III under modernization for ukraine army, while the thais got brand new BTR-3E and T-84, from ukraine. sure older equipment is just as effective in counterinsurgwncy warfare, but this is just ridiculous

user posted image
*
............BMP is still up to modern standard, but Panzer III ? doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif

sjavascript:emoticon(':w')eriously, I don't care if it's latin or cyrillic, just need to post them on some other forums for lulz. whistling.gif

This post has been edited by Gregyong: Mar 22 2016, 11:29 PM

121 Pages « < 27 28 29 30 31 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0261sec    0.40    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 02:10 PM