Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V20

views
     
waja2000
post Apr 7 2016, 12:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
Is RMAF got invite to Red Flag exercise ?
but it cost alot to join those exercise。。。

This post has been edited by waja2000: Apr 7 2016, 12:52 PM
waja2000
post Apr 7 2016, 11:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(thpace @ Apr 7 2016, 10:35 PM)
it would be before long before the current mkm would need upgrade as well

new radar is available as well now just that no political commitments
*
read from internet....
new AESA radar available, but it use much more electric power, than current su-30mkm engine have to upgrade new engine which more power trust, means more electric power.
AL-31FP have too upgrade to AL-31F M2 in future

waja2000
post Apr 8 2016, 02:50 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Apr 8 2016, 08:41 AM)
Chinese drones: Cheap, lethal and flying in the Middle East

user posted image

http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/china-drones-1492124367
*
i don't mind gov/Mod buy few unit CH4 for patrol Esscom, without satelite comms, still managed to control drome for 250-300km, enough for Esscom,price actually about 2-4 million per-set depend packages and quantity bomb for drone。

This post has been edited by waja2000: Apr 8 2016, 02:52 PM
waja2000
post Apr 11 2016, 09:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(azriel @ Apr 11 2016, 11:14 AM)
The Apaches have not been delivered yet. But there was news that Indonesian Air Force is ready to give support to the Philippine if needed to free the hostages. My guess it will be the Super Tucanos.
*
last year Philippine arm force they already received & commissioning 8 attack AW-109E (AW109LUH), is time send them fight with Abu Sayaf biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by waja2000: Apr 11 2016, 09:39 PM
waja2000
post Apr 12 2016, 01:02 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(Hemmett7 @ Apr 11 2016, 11:34 PM)
LTZ would not happy..later he turn into rage mode..how?
and what problem with Grippen single seat and engine? janji boleh ronda2 and escort jet asing keluar cukup lah. buat lah cara tak cukup budgets...kan kata urgent need nak replace aging mig29
Typhoon for pandan? need hangar with aircond? dont remember who say this...haha
*
Gripen Single engine
1- Safety issue like other people member mention.
2- power to weight ratio, for patrol is not issue, but for fighter combat, went single engine jet full loaded missile/bomb the fighter will overweight, power to weight ratio below 1:1, if not wrong about 1:0.8-0.9 , means lost flexibility & maneuvers to medium/heavy twin-engine fighter.
unless like F35 single engine with power more than twin-engine fighter。but f35 still suffer until now.
3. Grippen Ng not cheaper either, cost more than $100 million each。

This post has been edited by waja2000: Apr 12 2016, 01:13 AM
waja2000
post Apr 12 2016, 09:27 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(yinchet @ Apr 12 2016, 07:04 AM)
Gripen ng is not that expensive unless you wanna join in development or tot.
Its flyaway cost around 85mil.
my price always is full packages.
if flyaway cost i will mention. nowdays not really like to mention flyaway cost ...

This post has been edited by waja2000: Apr 12 2016, 11:03 AM
waja2000
post Apr 13 2016, 05:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Apr 13 2016, 04:25 PM)
Lockheed Wants To Install Its Aegis Combat System On New Amphibious Transport Dock Ship

[
San Antonio class need upgrade a lot power system and engine to support Aegis system.
waja2000
post Apr 13 2016, 05:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Apr 13 2016, 05:29 PM)
its also already 2 billion dollars per ship, for a soft LPD thats not even a helo carrier like the America class. better to plow the money into more F18s and properly sort out the Ford class carriers
*
they just want turn LPD to ballistic missile defense/interceptor ship. due LPD have large space can install many large missile in VLS.
waja2000
post Apr 15 2016, 10:20 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(CashiDE @ Apr 12 2016, 12:22 PM)
PLAN would not get involved. It is the chinese coast guard. China stake claim over the vast sea and consider anything happen in that area "internal affair", so coast guard is incharge, until someone send their navy gun blazzing.

The FPDA called for "consultancy/advice". Don't expect UK and gang will do anything that put themselves at risk.
*
seriously, our RMN, or APMM ship hard to compare to China coast guard ship, the so big 12000 tons ship, much bigger than our war ship, and no way gov will built 5-10k tonne APMM ship to fight with china.
so i thnk APMM or Gov can think buy some old 6000-15000 tonne cargo ship cost just about 2-8 million usd , some small modify to strengths hull become APMM ship, so show size during facing china coast ship mostly new 3000-5000 tons. so wen some time need confrontation, "langgar or Collide" ship to ship also ok. better than those 50-100 tons apmm ship. laugh.gif laugh.gif

This post has been edited by waja2000: Apr 15 2016, 10:23 AM
waja2000
post Apr 15 2016, 02:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Apr 15 2016, 01:47 PM)
this part is where you might as well design and build a ship from scratch. its a bit more complex than hillbilly armouring a Toyota Hilux.

I'd prefer we just bang out those Gowinds ASAFP and 10+ patrol boats plus a few maritime patrol aircraft. Numbers over quality at this stage.
*
build ship no point ,need hundred of million, no money 。。。。
build Gowind more also no point, we no going war with china and no power to war, also they using 3000-5000 tonns coast guard ship collide with gowind, we still loss. and china so long time waiting country fire first short. than they have reason take all the island.
getting cargo ship as apmm ship mainly learn china style, they using big ship to bully other country small caost guard ship, so getting those big 2nd hard cargo ship mainly use for show "size"and "Collide" if needed。

This post has been edited by waja2000: Apr 15 2016, 02:05 PM
waja2000
post Apr 15 2016, 02:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Apr 15 2016, 02:10 PM)
you've got a good point there re: ramming wars. But China don't play fair like other countries, I feel they will shoot before ram. Also their APMM ships are ex-mil and built to mil standard, converted civilian ships cannot match even in ramming war.

Main reason for using those big 10k+ ton ships IMO is fuel and supply, they have few logistics ships and until recently were not able to do at-sea replen IINM but still needed long range patrol ships to extend their territory. Now that they can put depots on Fiery Cross they may switch back to smaller ships, IDK...
*
agree,
china there new main coast guard is 3000tons, 4000tons, 5000tons ship, this just built over 20 this 3 category ship, and still much bigger asian country coast guard ship even navy ship.
so getting some old 2nd had 6000-8000 tons cargo ship is ideal to show size and for "collide".
waja2000
post Apr 15 2016, 09:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Apr 15 2016, 08:38 PM)
Fast Attack Craft (Missile)
yeah I dream of it too but likelihood of getting hmm.gif

p.s. but must call it Littoral Combat System (Modular) Low Observation Surface Access Denial Operations Vessel doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif
*
what can do with mini size FAC(M) ? fire missile or use to collide with China coast guard ship?
even fire, china more happy。 biggrin.gif


This post has been edited by waja2000: Apr 15 2016, 09:11 PM
waja2000
post Apr 16 2016, 01:25 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Apr 16 2016, 12:45 AM)
willing to bet no one likes either closing within range of ASM armed boat, or being painted with fire control... and more FACs means more eyes and better chance of saturation attack. At least a little more credible than 76mm or ramming by a civilian ship*.

*speaking of which, not sure many civilian ships can hit 25-30 knot speeds... hmm.gif
*
laugh.gif laugh.gif do you think china ship will worry on this.....
waja2000
post Apr 17 2016, 12:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Apr 16 2016, 02:34 AM)
I REALLY DUNNO MANG laugh.gif But dyou think they will worry about ramming either, when they have already exchanged shots with Viet and Phil navies? Advantage I'm thinking is that antiship missile certainly talks bigger than ramming, whether in peace or war, and China is afraid of actual war and diplomatic embarrassment - Indon basically called their bluff and they didn't dare retaliate for their fishing boats.

I feel they're like school gangster - try to pick on weak opponent but takut daring opponents even if the opponent is weaker
*
just learn more on Johnson South Reef Skirmish of 1988 (赤瓜礁海战). any over reaction just give our man kill。
they ship is bigger, so sure not worry to collide with other country small coast ship, you many see YouTube china coast guard ship ram other other coast ship line Vietnum & Japan, and they have money and more than 10 shipyard to built new ship, quickly to get replacement.
the ASM missile went your fire and hit china coast ship, than they have reason send navy ship and take down our island. went there navy come they have reason to Sunk our navy ship,and how many our have ship can war with china navy ?that why Vietnam/Philippine just patience not fire first shot.

yes, their acting like gangster, they even use economy power control we also suffer a lot.
waja2000
post Apr 18 2016, 02:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
any one going DSA in PWTC ?
waja2000
post Apr 20 2016, 12:17 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
Sea Platforms
DSA 2016: Boustead to offer scalable Kedah-class ships for Malaysian requirements

Dzirhan Mahadzir, Kuala Lumpur - IHS Jane's Defence Weekly
18 April 2016

Boustead Heavy Industries Corporation (BHIC) will offer a scalable version of the Royal Malaysian Navy's Kedah-class Next Generation Patrol Vessel (NGPV) to meet future ship requirements of the Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN), Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (MMEA) and Royal Malaysian Police (RMP) said BHIC Director of Defence and Security, Anuar Murad.

Anuar told IHS Jane's that scaled down versions of the 91 m Kedah-class NGPVs could be built and outfitted to the user's requirements by BHIC and would be cheaper than comparable locally built ships based on foreign hull designs, as BHIC has the intellectual property rights for the Kedah class.

http://www.janes.com/article/59593/dsa-201...an-requirements
waja2000
post Apr 20 2016, 10:20 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(azriel @ Apr 20 2016, 10:16 AM)
Malaysia signed LOI for 20 units Nexter Caesar 155mm SPH.
http://www.miltechmag.com/2016/04/dsa-2016...-malaysian.html
*
hopefully is propose Caesar new Generation 8x8

user posted image

user posted image

This post has been edited by waja2000: Apr 20 2016, 10:21 AM
waja2000
post Apr 20 2016, 10:34 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(hyperyouth_firepower @ Apr 20 2016, 10:23 AM)
I wonder how this will survive on Borneo roads (not inclusive of it airlifted between Sabah and Sarawak), it looks too damn long for tight turns.
*
the chassis is commercial 8x8 so it turn much smaller, you see the Wheelbase just like 5 ton lorry. example went front turn to left, the rear wheel will turn to wright direction so turning curve will be small.

This post has been edited by waja2000: Apr 20 2016, 10:35 AM
waja2000
post Apr 20 2016, 05:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(James831 @ Apr 20 2016, 11:22 AM)
When it changes from LOI to LOA, only  then we can be happy about it.
*
but Nexter CAESAR quite outdated product, more like manual SPH system sad.gif
prefer more advance SPH.
waja2000
post Apr 20 2016, 08:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(TechSuper @ Apr 20 2016, 05:59 PM)
but, but, it's got 52 cal barrels; which many gun SPH gun systems don't really offer. not to mention is very air-portable on board Hercs and Grizzly Atlas
*
many SPH also 52 cal now, we got A400M so not worry at all. many advance SPH not more than 30 tons,
we should think future, not buy some-think still using manual load caliber.

5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0207sec    0.64    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 11:33 PM