postponed again ???
  before that be informed on oct.

i suggest malton launch as earlier as possible with the economic condition will only getting bad. if they think of launch later can increase price higher then they are dreaming. skyluxe recent sales (cheaper than the park 1) already faced the difficulties. The park 2 is better to be as cheap as possible

meaning below 1k psf is  BBB 😉😉😉😉

The Park sky Some units 750psf only.

The Park sky Some units 750psf only.

Gadang is classified as construction instead of property sector

Yes, 100% sure
U can verify via daily national newspaper

Mostly agreed with you. According to The sales team, pv2 is focusing on expats. Predicted to have a lots of foreigners to come as a million ringgit property to them is just few hundreds dollars. My question is: how many expat will really wanted to stay in pv2, despite the jam, bj dun even have a international school nearby.

Most new project completion rental yield is about 3% to 4% considered good already.

Investing property and putting in FD difference.

For example RM 500,000 property, you only need to invest 10% -30% , around RM 50,000 to RM 150,000 then you can get 3-4% rental return.

If FD you need RM 500,000 cash then only to get the 3% - 4% interest rate return.

For sure the mall will succeed. But how's the condo?

308/acre is park2?what is the land size ah? i remem park sky is around 160 right? Also, comparing park,waltz, skyluxe also useless 1 la, all abang adik density..

But then 8lifts is interesting, just the layout is abit weird weird. Even small units' kitchen from park sky is more practical.

Generous? 10 Units per floor means 28 to 40  ppl each floor for 52 floor; means easily 1500 people in one tower if fully occupied. One lift only can take 10 to 12 ppl,  If give you 4 lift for peak hour  wanna wait for how long? Really close my eye. It's not generous,  it's bo bian, no choice,  have to compensate the load density. @#$%÷×

If u comparing to big unit . I think park2 quite outstanding among the surrounding projects. Unit layout looks well, full park view, and low psf.

Dont know sticker game or not but low floor units almost sold out

IMHO, both Park 1 n 2 have their reasons to be cheerful as a buyer. I like Park 1 vs Park 2 due to better orientation n easier to choose, as well as more facilities. Park 2 would be better only for huge units's orientation or facing n the special 9 lifts share by 10 units ( T1 ) n 8 ( T2 ). The risk is only being the record price in BJ and only 1 cp for small unit ( or anything below 1k sq ft )

Agree the layout is ntg special and dull, but for me, it's quite practical but, a lot much better than Skyluxe. If to include The Waltz, I think Waltz layout n sizes win by large margin but if really to choose, I go for Park 1 or Park 2 ( big size or uf small size, tower 2 ) while Waltz 1250 sq ft is excellent for reducing absolute price point compare to 1500 sq ft units available.

The Skyluxe, the view is all based on far view n not many units with short distance view except small units, again, directly facing Anjung Hijau. Skyluxe looks great in facade but layout was killed off by the allocation of more sq ft into balconies to save the construction costs. To sell as high end prop, every sq ft size is critical and it would be mass mistake to throw more than 15-20% of the size into balconies to make the rooms very small n fearful tat the high price thrown by a non any completed project developer was due to near Pav 2 or Recreationaal Park as selling point.

Btw, not many units of Park 2 is available, i prefer Park 2 bcz we can directly choose a unit if which level the car parks allocated. Too bad, 1500 sq ft giving 3 cps but some units, 2 of them still tandem.