Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Samsung Galaxy S7 & S7 Edge OFFICIAL DISCUSSION V1, Better and even better

views
     
lolzcalvin
post Feb 25 2016, 09:33 AM

shibe in predicament
******
Senior Member
1,591 posts

Joined: Mar 2014
From: 75°26'11.6"S, 136°16'16.0"E


I've been looking at some benchmark tests on both Exynos 8890 and Snapdragon 820, and each websites have their own stories on which is better. So from your perspective, which processor is better rclxub.gif

This post has been edited by lolzcalvin: Feb 25 2016, 09:34 AM
lolzcalvin
post Feb 25 2016, 09:51 AM

shibe in predicament
******
Senior Member
1,591 posts

Joined: Mar 2014
From: 75°26'11.6"S, 136°16'16.0"E


QUOTE(timetunes @ Feb 25 2016, 09:35 AM)
why u so concern abt benchmark score? u seem to be a geek who likes to compare which is meaningless in real-world usage.
*
Why not? Of course Who wouldn't know that a person can't "feel" the difference between an intel i5 and i7. And why can't I be concerned about them when I'm studying in computer science related field. Computing device feels it, that's why I'm interested in it. Since I asked for an opinion, you should stop wasting time to act like a pro on phones without a valid reason to back you up and randomly attack someone else you don't know.
lolzcalvin
post Feb 25 2016, 09:59 AM

shibe in predicament
******
Senior Member
1,591 posts

Joined: Mar 2014
From: 75°26'11.6"S, 136°16'16.0"E


QUOTE(-kytz- @ Feb 25 2016, 09:52 AM)
Benchmarking is absolutely meaningless to test the smoothness and fluidity of a phone.

I'd rather see practical tests such as app launch times, game loading speed, website page loading times, how fast you can launch the camera and snap a picture. If for gaming, show the gaming fps in comparison with other CPU/GPU.

Can u get that just by looking at benchmark scores? Nope.
*
You do have a point. But using time blocks to count the speed may vary till that it may result in bigger variations between various trials eh? But true though, it also goes the same with benchmark tests. Just that we need to perform multiple repetition nod.gif
lolzcalvin
post Mar 2 2016, 11:24 AM

shibe in predicament
******
Senior Member
1,591 posts

Joined: Mar 2014
From: 75°26'11.6"S, 136°16'16.0"E


QUOTE(-kytz- @ Mar 2 2016, 10:36 AM)
I think they have never had this feature before lol. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Wireless audio is so convenient for outdoors. I often use it going to and coming back from work, using the lrt. I currently use the Sony SBH52 and just hook it to my shirt.

Wired earphones, connected to the phone, makes things messy. You always have to be careful of the wires constantly moving around and not getting entangled with things around you. My earphones are quit fragile so bending, pulling or twisting are a no no. Not to mention cable noise too.
*
http://www.nme.com/blogs/nme-blogs/everyth...msung-galaxy-s7

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


But compared with LG G5, G5 streams at 24-bit aptx HD but S7 still stream at 16-bit.
lolzcalvin
post Mar 3 2016, 08:23 AM

shibe in predicament
******
Senior Member
1,591 posts

Joined: Mar 2014
From: 75°26'11.6"S, 136°16'16.0"E


QUOTE(andrekua2 @ Mar 2 2016, 01:01 PM)
Dont waste time with Apt-X...

If you are going to use bluetooth headset, then no choice. Otherwise just get wifi audio receiver, guarantee no compression.
*
That was the purpose of my reply sweat.gif

Someone thought s7 didn't have aptx codec and he/she always use wireless headphones.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0353sec    0.78    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 07:29 PM