Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Malaysians destroying self with Foreigner issue

views
     
SUSs2peMocls
post Feb 22 2016, 10:15 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
672 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(qilaf @ Feb 21 2016, 03:50 PM)
Ignorant cunt
*
So fast decended into cussing and name calling... That's a sure sign of someone who's lost the conversation.
SUSs2peMocls
post Feb 22 2016, 10:23 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
672 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(bananajoe @ Feb 22 2016, 01:56 AM)
so are u willing to work as 3D worker with 800 a month ?
*

Are you willing to make 3D jobs better for free? E.g. are you willing to stop littering so the municipal don't have to hire banglas to pick up street litter?

QUOTE(+3kk! @ Feb 22 2016, 10:00 AM)
first we must realise that the market in malaysia is smaller, and hence likewise our local cars can just sell that many and is unsustainable. and likewise even the problems that plague japan, do plague us and moreso because of our smaller size.

while i dont agree with all you have to say, msians definitely has to venture overseas into the international scene because our local market is exactly like what you said, too small. but msians i notice dont do it, often not we can observe this time after time, each time a company or a product becomes a bit big, it goes into autopilot, arrogance seeps in, theres no innovation - nothing. this is further a problem because "big" is in definition = comfortable life for the owner. 
*

M'sian market is too small for what? I don't think it's too small for a car market, as you can see, over the last 30 years proton has been pretty successful within the local market only.
SUSs2peMocls
post Feb 22 2016, 11:29 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
672 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(+3kk! @ Feb 22 2016, 10:43 AM)
its too small for any market, you can build a successful company here, but the grand scale of things, being just a local player (most of our companies) makes it hard for the country to grow larger, all of the "omfg, x country is better than msia" are all big international players.

it also means that if another country build itself up to be a global player, we would be behind them, and then people start bitching about how we once was better. or that job options are lesser (no foreign office), company revenue lesser, ROI to shareholders would be smaller.

with such a small size, we are unable to build large domestic behemoths like walmart.

but my point was less on its size, more its mentality, I've seen it soo often where msian do business up to x age or y quality of life then just stop. how to build big businesses if majority of the folks who had this opportunity just goes "life is good bro, lets chill out"
*

I'll have to disagree with you on just about every aspect of what you have mentioned. We have many companies which have become successful capitalizing SOLELY on local market.

e.g. Mydin, Dutch Lady, Milo, Maxis, Celcom, Perodua, Public Bank, and so on and so forth. Over the decades after the formation of M'sia, especially under mahatiu's administration, m'sians have somehow been brainwashed to kowtow to foreign investors, and then somehow leading to the belief that "m'sian market is too small", when the fact is that the over-reliance of FDIs sapped the country of innovation and growth it would otherwise have if m'sia moved up the value chain.

QUOTE(bananajoe @ Feb 22 2016, 10:46 AM)
doing that everyday. Problem  ?
*

How many people you know are doing what you're doing? I still see many garbage on the streets, even though I do my share of telling people to pick up their trash when I see them litter, I can't be telling everyone to do so.

SUSs2peMocls
post Feb 22 2016, 11:52 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
672 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(+3kk! @ Feb 22 2016, 11:46 AM)
none of the msian companies are in S&P 50 Asia - none ;even our best and most cherished petronas is not in the top 10 oil companies in the world. In almost every top 10, top big company list of almost everything that is in Asia (not the world yet) msian companies appear rarely and sparsely.

to put it even further on success, those companies you mentioned are successes in just the domestic scene, of which milo is not msian nor is dutch lady. none of the above companies made any dents internationally, just local domestic markets, of which even the golden goose of Public Bank is dwarfed by the sheer might of singaporean banks,

success comparative to the small pond they live in, yes they are, the big sea, those names you mentioned are no where near successful, they are not even medium sized fishes.

its not kowtow to foreign investors, its the reality of what it is, we are just not good enough and if we dont expand outwards, we will never be.
*

Ok... now you're twisting facts to just your narrative. Just now you say local market is not big enough, when shown how local markets are big enough, you go and conflate them with international markets. Singaporean banks, do not serve only locals, they serve international companies, i.e. NOT local market.

Don't be shifting your goal posts now. If you want to talk about local markets, stick to local markets.

p.s. You're right, Milo is by Nestle, which is a global company. But Dutch Lady is local.
SUSs2peMocls
post Feb 22 2016, 02:25 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
672 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(+3kk! @ Feb 22 2016, 12:07 PM)
I'm not, you just dont follow the tain of thought, IF the local scene is big enough, then companies like Mydin will appear in the international scene as a big fish, like how some china companies do. but it doesnt, with the local scene only, it cannot generate enough funds or sales to be an international player, hence not big enough.

All banks serve international companies.

so you dont think I'm shifting the goalposts,  I'm trying to point out is, our local scene is too small to create large international big guns like some other places (US/CHINA).

Ps: dutchlady is by fieslandcampina

Duch Lady
*
You're speak as if big global companies turn up overnight. I'm refuting your claim that the m'sian market is "too small" for companies to expand, when in fact, this is not true. Malaysia International Shipping Corporation is pretty big, Resorts World is big too, by any definition. They're all local companies. I don't even need to crack my brains to think of the examples.

by your definition that "our local scene is too small to create large international big guns" hold true for many countries even for those bigger than m'sia, is flawed. You don't need me to tell you just how many "local" companies in the US who had to shift their operations offshore because hiring from "local market" is too expensive. In short, you're oversimplifying the problem.

You want to say "local", I'm telling you Public Bank is local, and they started off servicing local markets. Dutch Lady started off local before being acquired by FrieslandCampina.
SUSs2peMocls
post Feb 22 2016, 03:34 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
672 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(+3kk! @ Feb 22 2016, 02:50 PM)
all of our local companies didnt turn up overnight most of the ones you mentioned have been around for a few decades, likewise MISC and Resorts world are not as big as the big players, they are big in malaysia, but not the world.

which i think you keep going on about big, is in the context of msia, hence why you keep putting up companies that are just big domestically, the initial point was, our companies are ONLY big here and thereafter not competitive in the global scene, which you may have missed.

I'm not sure why you are even bringing production in, a domestic player is one that sells to the domestic market, they can put production anywhere in the world but as long as majority of sales are generated in their homeland, its a domestic player.

All establishments started off servicing local markets, but from there they need to expand and venture into international markets, public bank has yet to do this well.

and dutchlady started off under the Friesland umbrella then during the merger, became under FrieslandCampina. it was never a local brand, you might argue that it is due to technicalities of share ownership, but that is quite thin.

Duch Lady
*

MISC and Resorts world are not as the "big players"??? Who are the other local big players? Resorts World's only competition that we know of is Berjaya Group, and MAERSK is a conglomerate.

You do realize, that by your very definitions, that NONE of the countries have a big enough "local market", right?

WTF man... you're confusing Dutch "heritage" for company history. And if you choose to deny Dutch Lady as a local company, then you'd probably have realize that there are not "local companies" either. IBM, Intel, Google, Facebook are all hodgepodges of myriads of companies coming together.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_Lady_Mi...dustries_Berhad

Be realistic man, and be honest.

This post has been edited by s2peMocls: Feb 22 2016, 03:38 PM
SUSs2peMocls
post Feb 22 2016, 04:07 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
672 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(+3kk! @ Feb 22 2016, 03:55 PM)
like i have mentioned very much before, in the local scene they are big i agree, just not that big in the international scene. but for some odd reason you keep ignoring it.

exactly my point, only a select few countries can have a big enough local market, and most of the big guns are international players. so by just focusing on the local scene, our companies wont be big enough. the point i was making which you some how another missed (considering my whole post was about it and I've repeated it time and time again) , was that

"local companies focusing on local market cannot grow large enough to fight with international big boys, if we want to fight with them we have to be an international player like they are as our local scene is too small."
You still haven't addressed that the big international players are big because they're a group of companies, rather than a company. Take GM for example, at one point they didn't have a big enough "local market" to sustain itself either.

Top Glove (again... a m'sian company) is huge in terms of company size and market size. Where's the recognition there?

To you, a company or a market is only "big" if it fits your definition.

QUOTE(+3kk! @ Feb 22 2016, 03:55 PM)
nope, you got that mixed again, its in the second page
Same link
*
Again... you're not seeing that Dutch Lady started off in M'sia as Pacific Milk Industries, and has grown as a Malaysian brand, not a foreign brand.

This post has been edited by s2peMocls: Feb 22 2016, 04:09 PM
SUSs2peMocls
post Feb 22 2016, 04:41 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
672 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(+3kk! @ Feb 22 2016, 04:24 PM)
i dont really know what you are going on about really, the point as i have been trying to make time and time again, is the msian market by itself wont make our companies big.

some big companies are big because they are a group of companies, some not , some sell to mainly a domestic market, orders an international one. but the crux of the matter is, we dont have the market to create a big company selling to the domestic market, like walmart, a huge local market behemoth that doesnt have much presence outside of usa.

comparatively MISC has RM10b in revenue (its also a group of companies with various interests), one of the biggest shipping companies is x5 that amount and in usd. i mean i cant say MISC is a big company against one that is 5 times larger, i dont really know how to go about it.
So why do you consider WalMart big, but Mydin is not? If WalMart chooses not to expand outside of the US, that means the US market is too small? By your rationale a retail giant like Parkson is thus bigger than WalMart. MISC is huge by any standards, you don't compare a behemoth with an elephant and then say an elephant is small amongst all animals.

Your reasoning that "m'sia market is too small" simply holds no water. Given the number of population we have, vs the successes these companies have, I'd say m'sia is a big enough market to do a lot of things.

QUOTE(+3kk! @ Feb 22 2016, 04:24 PM)
erm its even in your link bro
I'm not even sure how to go about this, foreigner brought dutch baby brand into msia, setup a local production facility, listed it in msia. then holds control under a parent company, changes the name from dutch baby to dutch lady, I'm not sure how to call it msian.
*

Ok I'll let you have this one, as I have already plenty of other examples of local companies that made it big.
SUSs2peMocls
post Feb 22 2016, 05:17 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
672 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(+3kk! @ Feb 22 2016, 05:06 PM)
Walmart has a revenue of nearly half a trillion usd, my rationale is if mydin or parson can create even 1/5th of walmarts revenue, hell they are large companies and the local market is defo big enough for them to challenge global players  but a lot of our local companies cant even hit 10%.

I've already mentioned time and time again, our companies are only big locally, but internationally they are very very very very small. I'm really not sure where you are going from here, I've pretty much agreed with you that they are big domestically.

i mean what you want me to say, ignore these big sharks and claim our companies are big?? that doesnt make sense, if its big, its big, whats wrong about saying they are big and we are small?
*

I'm saying your claim that "msia market is too small" does not hold water. How many times I repeated already. Is WalMart coming into m'sia to kill Mydin? No. So why even compare the two on a broken scale?

Let's say WalMart makes 1 billion dollars out of 300 million people in America. That means they're making 3.3 dollars per person in America.
And if Mydin makes 100 million dollars out of 27 million people in m'sia. That means they're making 3.7 dollars per person in m'sia.

So even though you're comparing 1 billion dollars with 100 million dollars, Mydin is performing better than WalMart. That's how it should be measured. That's how telcos calculate their performance (i.e. the ARPU). The moment WalMart steps into m'sia, or Mydin steps into America, then you can start comparing the 2.

So if you take into account how well the big m'sian companies do with our "small market", I'd say they're doing pretty well. Of course, unless your intention is look at absolute numbers only, then you would be implying that our solution is just to make more babies.
SUSs2peMocls
post Feb 22 2016, 05:47 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
672 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(clearofis @ Feb 22 2016, 05:22 PM)
Malaysian population 30 million. US population 300++ million..
if malaysian develop own apps it need at least 10 years become popular compare at US it need 3-5 years become worldwide....
*

That's a wrong comparison. WhatsApp came from a country with only 8.5 million people, but gained global popularity. Kakaotalk came from a country with a population of 50 million, but does not even come close to the market penetration of WhatsApp.
SUSs2peMocls
post Feb 22 2016, 06:04 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
672 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(+3kk! @ Feb 22 2016, 05:47 PM)
because when walmart ever comes in, then folks like mydin who are too small to fight start asking for protek protek. also because we dont have a lot of such companies, even if we dont swap things to usd, how many RM50b companies are there?

Usa has a population of about 300mil, we have about 30m, usa is 10 times our size. but is walmart 10 times bigger than mydin? nope, its more than a 100 times (mydin recorded revenues of only RM 2-3b). so using the same argument, walmart generates a lot more.

I'm not really sure why you are soo defiant over it, it just shows how we stand in the global scale, we are small, we have a lot of companies who sell to the local market that are smaller than 10b, thats the reality of it, thats our market.

we can agree to disagree if you want to, not that it matters to me, but i just thought it strange least for the first time in /k/ someone actually argued for msian companies.
*

Well... Mydin flourished amidst a flood of foreign super/hypermarkets, e.g. Carrefour, Tesco, Jusco, etc. Is WalMart more than 10 times bigger than Mydin? Probably. I don't deny that either. But really, we're currently picking on instances that favors our narrative. Using the same parameters, I can say that Perodua does better than GM. Or if you want to compare on absolute numbers, Maybank at one point was doing better than Chase.

When you made the statement that "m'sian market is too small", you made two errors. 1) You've grossly oversimplified the situation, 2) the oversimplification is incorrect. I can't in good conscience let such a statement go unchallenged in a public forum. So yes... of course I am defiant because someone is painting an inaccurate picture.

Even in your current retort of "how we stand in the global scale", I would say on a global scale, we're doing quite good. Not as good as we had been, or could be, but still quite good. Not that I am "arguing for m'sian companies", I am simply arguing against bad premises.
SUSs2peMocls
post Feb 23 2016, 10:11 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
672 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(+3kk! @ Feb 22 2016, 06:22 PM)
walmart is more than 100 times bigger, yup you are correct, i daresay the same of tesla and 08 lehman brothers.

i wont go on coz got dinner to attend to, but just a food for thought:-

walmart is bigger than our entire GDP in 14,
Samsung is about par.
only 6 companies that hit the 50b club would be almost equal to our entire nations GDP.
*

Like I had said, you will only accept "big" if it fits your definition. You don't see me comparing m'sia to zimbabwe.

QUOTE(advocado @ Feb 22 2016, 06:55 PM)
without the Foreign Workers, Mydin sales will drop at least 30%. I assume you frequent Mydin to notice that.
*

Sales will drop 30% or profit drops 30%?

This post has been edited by s2peMocls: Feb 23 2016, 10:11 AM

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0140sec    0.88    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 02:09 PM