If you have been to the site, you will know that by having a separated entrance, the already narrow one way road will be forced to become two way. Coz the free cost block will block the access at the back. Is a trap. A fence was actually illegally built at the back with the intention of blocking but then removed after complain lodged by PPAM owner.

I guess PPAM guys do not want any additional facilities. Just maintenance fees to be reduced. That’s all.

Because they weren't given the chance to vote yes/no to the proposal I guess? Based on the reply given by Nabil, it suggests that the reps did not relay the proposal to the rest of the residents for whatever reasons.

Thus far block A reps are also rejecting the idea of putting up PPAM sign from what I was informed. I wonder why? 

Without the fence/gate, block A residents can crossover to block B facilities through the back road right? And according to the residents I spoke to, they were told the developer would put up a fence/gate at the point of selling the property. But the end product became what it is today.

But I believe this development is truly farked up in any way it is.
I wonder what is lulus bersyarat in this case...

Like, what even is the syarat?